Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Raced a new 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2011, 11:11 AM
  #121  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ss1129
243 heads werent specific to ls6 motors. The sodium filled valves were specific to the z06 though. So no, you didnt fix anything.
243 heads with sodium valves are not LS1 heads either. And they certainly shouldnt be considered LS1 heads if they came on an LS6 longblock
Old 01-06-2011, 11:12 AM
  #122  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
ss1129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft Lupton, CO
Posts: 1,515
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ke^in
Are they similar enough that there will be no difference in power, or is it possible to see HP differences in higher RPMs? Not trying to bust your *****, but you kinda contradicted yourself there.
Anything is possible....but there is no evidence that an ls6 block increases hp over an ls1 block.

Pretty much every year there were changes to the ls1..from 97 all the way to 2002. No two years are really the same...only the power.
Old 01-06-2011, 11:24 AM
  #123  
11 Second Club
 
LT/LS Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: E-town raceway
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
anyways heres a bolton automatic mustang. apparently theyve hit 11.4@119 with it which is .11 away from the cammed LS6 quoted above.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STmlGMANS0Q
That car you listed above IS NOT a full weight car. If you wan't to talk about weight reduction/suspension bolt-on cars, the LS1 has already been der done dat!

Naturally Aspirated - Bolt-on's - Stock Motor* :..

F-Body
Board ID - 1/4 ET @ MPH (60ft), Yr & Type of car
RUQWIKR -------- 10.685 @ 122.91 (1.37), 01 Formula T400
Project_SS ----- 10.866 @ 122.14 (1.45), 98 Camaro SS A4
Magnus --------- 10.987 @ 119.31 (1.42), 97 Firebird A4
Promod1955 ----- 11.030 @ 124.18 (1.45), 00 Camaro SS A4
Skelton -------- 11.088 @ 119.10 (1.44), 01 Formula A3
1BAD98LS1 ------ 11.089 @ 120.62 (1.47), 98 Formula A4
Hawkn01 -------- 11.256 @ 118.48 (1.52), 01 Firehawk A4
SilentbutViolent 11.302 @ 117.84 (1.52), 98 Camaro Z28 A4
V6 Bird -------- 11.322 @ 118.67 (1.53), 01 Formula A4
Matt D --------- 11.421 @ 116.24 (1.47), 99 Camaro Z28 A4
ATwelveSec02Z28 11.424 @ 119.26 (1.53), 02 Camaro Z28 M6
BAIN ----------- 11.429 @ 116.81 (1.51), 00 Camaro SS A4
Lane ----------- 11.458 @ 117.33 (1.53), 01 Camaro Z28 A4
11SECSS -------- 11.458 @ 116.94 (1.50), 01 Camaro SS A4
DMcRacer ------- 11.468 @ 116.88 (1.56), 02 Camaro SS A4
MDBlackZ28 ----- 11.494 @ 115.85 (1.56), 00 Camaro Z28 A4
Black Sunshine - 11.496 @ 116.24 (1.52), 01 Camaro SS A4
NSSANE02 ------- 11.514 @ 119.50 (1.64), 02 Camaro SS M6
Birdman -------- 11.519 @ 115.60 (1.55), 98 TransAmWS6 A4
WILWAXU -------- 11.544 @ 115.36 (1.53), 01 Formula A4
01-Z ----------- 11.549 @ 117.82 (1.60), 01 Camaro Z28 M6
Lynda ---------- 11.550 @ 115.36 (1.51), 01 Camaro Z28 A4
chrs1313 ------- 11.558 @ 116.24 (1.54), 02 Camaro Z28 A4
Raughammer ----- 11.562 @ 115.25 (1.50), 98 Camaro Z28 A4
2002Z ---------- 11.564 @ 115.75 (1.52), 02 Camaro Z28 A4
Colonel -------- 11.565 @ 115.54 (1.51), 00 Camaro Z28 A4
RAGEman -------- 11.568 @ 121.13 (1.71), 01 Camaro Z28 M6
Dangerous SS --- 11.576 @ 116.52 (1.55), 02 Camaro SS A4
Shon Herron ---- 11.592 @ 113.00 (1.50), 97 Z28 LS1swap A4
MikeHoffpauir -- 11.593 @ 116.00 (1.56), 00 Camaro Z28 A4
JFM ------------ 11.623 @ 115.44 (1.57), 99 Camaro SS A4
DOUBT IT ------- 11.623 @ 114.94 (1.57), 00 Camaro Z28 A4
mmiller -------- 11.664 @ 114.55 (1.53), 01 Camaro SS A4
JS12 ----------- 11.672 @ 119.23 (1.72), 02 Camaro Z28 M6
LARRY01Z28 ----- 11.674 @ 118.20 (1.71), 01 Camaro Z28 M6
JASON ---------- 11.682 @ 116.37 (1.62), 98 Camaro Z28 A4
FASTR A4 ------- 11.694 @ 114.57 (1.56), 00 Formula A4
Magnet --------- 11.699 @ 115.38 (1.59), 02 Camaro SS A4
LS1INSIDE ------ 11.700 @ 114.93 (1.55), 99 Camaro Z28 A4
AliWantsNss ---- 11.702 @ 116.58 (1.56), 02 Camaro Z28 M6
MikeG ---------- 11.702 @ 115.66 (1.63), 01 Camaro SS A4
Kent1 ---------- 11.704 @ 115.38 (1.51), 99 Camaro SS A4
1999TransamWs6 - 11.715 @ 115.93 (1.73), 99 Trans am A3
JonCR96Z ------- 11.715 @ 113.39 (1.56), 01 Trans-Am A4
XtremeLS1Z28 --- 11.719 @ 115.07 (1.64), 00 Camaro Z28 A4
2Quick4U ------- 11.721 @ 115.19 (1.58), 00 Trans-Am A4
MADCOW --------- 11.730 @ 115.80 (1.57), 98 Camaro Z28 A4
black02-z28 ---- 11.731 @ 113.81 (1.50), 02 Camaro Z28 A4
z28kid98 ------- 11.740 @ 113.55 (1.56), 98 Camaro Z28 A4
Durien --------- 11.747 @ 117.59 (1.60), 99 Camaro SS M6

Old 01-06-2011, 11:26 AM
  #124  
11 Second Club
 
LT/LS Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: E-town raceway
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^Not too shabby for an old SBC i'd say.
Old 01-06-2011, 11:28 AM
  #125  
On The Tree
 
Demon 383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LT/LS Guy
^^Not too shabby for an old SBC i'd say.
Correct and the 10-second BOLT-ON 5.0 car from Evolution Performance had a decent amount of weight reduction done to as well.
Old 01-06-2011, 11:29 AM
  #126  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LT/LS Guy
That car you listed above IS NOT a full weight car. If you wan't to talk about weight reduction/suspension bolt-on cars, the LS1 has already been der done dat!

Naturally Aspirated - Bolt-on's - Stock Motor* :..

F-Body
Board ID - 1/4 ET @ MPH (60ft), Yr & Type of car
RUQWIKR -------- 10.685 @ 122.91 (1.37), 01 Formula T400
Project_SS ----- 10.866 @ 122.14 (1.45), 98 Camaro SS A4
Magnus --------- 10.987 @ 119.31 (1.42), 97 Firebird A4
Promod1955 ----- 11.030 @ 124.18 (1.45), 00 Camaro SS A4
Skelton -------- 11.088 @ 119.10 (1.44), 01 Formula A3
1BAD98LS1 ------ 11.089 @ 120.62 (1.47), 98 Formula A4
Hawkn01 -------- 11.256 @ 118.48 (1.52), 01 Firehawk A4
SilentbutViolent 11.302 @ 117.84 (1.52), 98 Camaro Z28 A4
V6 Bird -------- 11.322 @ 118.67 (1.53), 01 Formula A4
Matt D --------- 11.421 @ 116.24 (1.47), 99 Camaro Z28 A4
ATwelveSec02Z28 11.424 @ 119.26 (1.53), 02 Camaro Z28 M6
BAIN ----------- 11.429 @ 116.81 (1.51), 00 Camaro SS A4
Lane ----------- 11.458 @ 117.33 (1.53), 01 Camaro Z28 A4
11SECSS -------- 11.458 @ 116.94 (1.50), 01 Camaro SS A4
DMcRacer ------- 11.468 @ 116.88 (1.56), 02 Camaro SS A4
MDBlackZ28 ----- 11.494 @ 115.85 (1.56), 00 Camaro Z28 A4
Black Sunshine - 11.496 @ 116.24 (1.52), 01 Camaro SS A4
NSSANE02 ------- 11.514 @ 119.50 (1.64), 02 Camaro SS M6
Birdman -------- 11.519 @ 115.60 (1.55), 98 TransAmWS6 A4
WILWAXU -------- 11.544 @ 115.36 (1.53), 01 Formula A4
01-Z ----------- 11.549 @ 117.82 (1.60), 01 Camaro Z28 M6
Lynda ---------- 11.550 @ 115.36 (1.51), 01 Camaro Z28 A4
chrs1313 ------- 11.558 @ 116.24 (1.54), 02 Camaro Z28 A4
Raughammer ----- 11.562 @ 115.25 (1.50), 98 Camaro Z28 A4
2002Z ---------- 11.564 @ 115.75 (1.52), 02 Camaro Z28 A4
Colonel -------- 11.565 @ 115.54 (1.51), 00 Camaro Z28 A4
RAGEman -------- 11.568 @ 121.13 (1.71), 01 Camaro Z28 M6
Dangerous SS --- 11.576 @ 116.52 (1.55), 02 Camaro SS A4
Shon Herron ---- 11.592 @ 113.00 (1.50), 97 Z28 LS1swap A4
MikeHoffpauir -- 11.593 @ 116.00 (1.56), 00 Camaro Z28 A4
JFM ------------ 11.623 @ 115.44 (1.57), 99 Camaro SS A4
DOUBT IT ------- 11.623 @ 114.94 (1.57), 00 Camaro Z28 A4
mmiller -------- 11.664 @ 114.55 (1.53), 01 Camaro SS A4
JS12 ----------- 11.672 @ 119.23 (1.72), 02 Camaro Z28 M6
LARRY01Z28 ----- 11.674 @ 118.20 (1.71), 01 Camaro Z28 M6
JASON ---------- 11.682 @ 116.37 (1.62), 98 Camaro Z28 A4
FASTR A4 ------- 11.694 @ 114.57 (1.56), 00 Formula A4
Magnet --------- 11.699 @ 115.38 (1.59), 02 Camaro SS A4
LS1INSIDE ------ 11.700 @ 114.93 (1.55), 99 Camaro Z28 A4
AliWantsNss ---- 11.702 @ 116.58 (1.56), 02 Camaro Z28 M6
MikeG ---------- 11.702 @ 115.66 (1.63), 01 Camaro SS A4
Kent1 ---------- 11.704 @ 115.38 (1.51), 99 Camaro SS A4
1999TransamWs6 - 11.715 @ 115.93 (1.73), 99 Trans am A3
JonCR96Z ------- 11.715 @ 113.39 (1.56), 01 Trans-Am A4
XtremeLS1Z28 --- 11.719 @ 115.07 (1.64), 00 Camaro Z28 A4
2Quick4U ------- 11.721 @ 115.19 (1.58), 00 Trans-Am A4
MADCOW --------- 11.730 @ 115.80 (1.57), 98 Camaro Z28 A4
black02-z28 ---- 11.731 @ 113.81 (1.50), 02 Camaro Z28 A4
z28kid98 ------- 11.740 @ 113.55 (1.56), 98 Camaro Z28 A4
Durien --------- 11.747 @ 117.59 (1.60), 99 Camaro SS M6

so youre saying that after only 6 months of existence, that 5.0 is already 10th on your all time cam only list with the handicap of only having BOLT ONS!?!?! thats impressive considering the ls1 has had a 13year head start!
Old 01-06-2011, 11:29 AM
  #127  
On The Tree
 
Demon 383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Heck if those car really do drop a full 2-seconds with just BOLT-ONS and nothing else i'm trading in my vette tomorrow.
Old 01-06-2011, 11:30 AM
  #128  
On The Tree
 
Demon 383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
so youre saying that after only 6 months of existence the 5.0 is already 10th on your all time cam only list with the handicap of only having BOLT ONS!?!?! thats impressive
That's not the CAM-ONLY list do-do head. That's BOLT-ONS.

Originally Posted by LT/LS Guy
Naturally Aspirated - Bolt-on's - Stock Motor* :..
The cam-only record is in the 9's now.
Old 01-06-2011, 11:32 AM
  #129  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
ss1129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft Lupton, CO
Posts: 1,515
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
so youre saying that after only 6 months of existence, that 5.0 is already 10th on your all time cam only list with the handicap of only having BOLT ONS!?!?! thats impressive

When you throw a better motor/trans/gear into a platform that has been out for 6 years thats what happens. I love how people act like the new mustang fell out of the sky.


EDIT: I missed the part where he thought it was cam only. LMAO
Old 01-06-2011, 11:32 AM
  #130  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Demon 383
Correct and the 10-second BOLT-ON 5.0 car from Evolution Performance had a decent amount of weight reduction done to as well.


edit: that was bolt on list my mistake

why is weight never listed and never spoken of on all the lists (even on other boards and other makes)??
Old 01-06-2011, 11:38 AM
  #131  
11 Second Club
 
LT/LS Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: E-town raceway
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
edit: that was bolt on list my mistake

why is weight never listed and never spoken of on all the lists (even on other boards and other makes)??
Those cars had weight reduction of course, some a great amount, just like the Evolution Performance bolt-on 5.0 that wen't 10s. All is fair.
Old 01-06-2011, 11:40 AM
  #132  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
ss1129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft Lupton, CO
Posts: 1,515
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
edit: that was bolt on list my mistake

why is weight never listed and never spoken of on all the lists (even on other boards and other makes)??
The secret is what people cant see.
Old 01-06-2011, 11:41 AM
  #133  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LT/LS Guy
Those cars had weight reduction of course, some a great amount, just like the Evolution Performance bolt-on 5.0 that wen't 10s. All is fair.
i see, just wondering what the final weights were. But im sure the evo performance car in the 10's is certainly not the fastest we will see. The 5.0 has only been around a few short months.
Old 01-06-2011, 11:42 AM
  #134  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Arc00TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The 'Nard
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Ke^in
Are they similar enough that there will be no difference in power, or is it possible to see HP differences in higher RPMs? Not trying to bust your *****, but you kinda contradicted yourself there.
Yeah, I see what you mean. I was saying on average you won't see a difference, but its possible if you put them both on an engine dyno back to back you might see a few peak hp. The variation between engines of the same kind is probably bigger than the difference you might see there. Sorry to sound contradictory, I'm at work and was typing it in a hurry.
Old 01-06-2011, 11:44 AM
  #135  
11 Second Club
 
LT/LS Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: E-town raceway
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
i see, just wondering what the final weights were. But im sure the evo performance car in the 10's is certainly not the fastest we will see. The 5.0 has only been around a few short months.
I'm sure it isn't. That's a bad *** motor. I can't wait to see how they compare with more extensive mods (i.e. Heads, Cams, Intake Manifolds)
Old 01-06-2011, 11:44 AM
  #136  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ss1129
The secret is what people cant see.
thats stupid. so if you can hide a nitrous system then you really feel its fair game just because its not visible? what is it with people that drive hacked up cars that dont want others to know? is it shame?
Old 01-06-2011, 11:47 AM
  #137  
On The Tree
 
Demon 383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
thats stupid. so if you can hide a nitrous system then you really feel its fair game just because its not visible? what is it with people that drive hacked up cars that dont want others to know? is it shame?
That's the fun part of drag racing. You don't have to tell the next man what all you got. Guys have been doing that since the beginning. Ever heard of a 'Sneaky Pete'?
Old 01-06-2011, 11:58 AM
  #138  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Demon 383
That's the fun part of drag racing. You don't have to tell the next man what all you got. Guys have been doing that since the beginning. Ever heard of a 'Sneaky Pete'?
i know its been around since the beginning. i just think the more someone has to hide, the more dishonorable or untrusting. I just like racing for fun and to keep it competitive. I remember when i was younger in my LT1, some dumbass in a 5.0 wanted to race me. I told him it might be a good race cuz he said he had boltons. we went out lined up and turned out he had a 200shot of nitrous and ran by me like nothing. Really? why even line up cars KNOWING that it aint even gonna be a good race??? so we will have to disagree on this subject, its a gray area of right and wrong IMO. i dont like that evo performance acts like they list all their mods, but removing things is also a mod.
Old 01-06-2011, 12:02 PM
  #139  
On The Tree
 
Demon 383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
i know its been around since the beginning. i just think the more someone has to hide, the more dishonorable or untrusting. I just like racing for fun and to keep it competitive. I remember when i was younger in my LT1, some dumbass in a 5.0 wanted to race me. I told him it might be a good race cuz he said he had boltons. we went out lined up and turned out he had a 200shot of nitrous and ran by me like nothing. Really? why even line up cars KNOWING that it aint even gonna be a good race??? so we will have to disagree on this subject, its a gray area of right and wrong IMO.
Yeah I remember the stang guys being the most good for that. Especially the fox-body guys. They would almost always hide their mods. I didn't mind though, it made the game more fun for me. Just gotta be sure you bring enuff.
Old 01-06-2011, 12:06 PM
  #140  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
ss1129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft Lupton, CO
Posts: 1,515
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
i know its been around since the beginning. i just think the more someone has to hide, the more dishonorable or untrusting. I just like racing for fun and to keep it competitive. I remember when i was younger in my LT1, some dumbass in a 5.0 wanted to race me. I told him it might be a good race cuz he said he had boltons. we went out lined up and turned out he had a 200shot of nitrous and ran by me like nothing. Really? why even line up cars KNOWING that it aint even gonna be a good race??? so we will have to disagree on this subject, its a gray area of right and wrong IMO. i dont like that evo performance acts like they list all their mods, but removing things is also a mod.
When you race in events for prize money and there are power or weight limits you dont want people to know how you got your car down that light ect ect. Its like helping out the competition. Plus if you set up a street race for $$ and you only have bolt ons, but -300 from crafty weight removal it really helps you out.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 PM.