Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

2010 SHO vs 2000 Trans Am

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2011, 10:52 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Average Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2010 SHO vs 2000 Trans Am

Good Evening all,

After wasting my time for the vast majority of the Saturday before MLK day, I had decided to meet up with a close friend in Wilmington, NC. After much negative input he had received prior to buying it, he was adamant in making it a respectable vehicle to drag race. His current mods are k&n intake and tune.
My mods are pretty much every bolt on for an LS1 besides EWP and Fast intake. We decided to go from a 30 roll, being a slight weak spot for my car, he honks it off and takes a 1/2 car lead temporarily. I proceed to pass him at 60, and put 3 cars on him to 110 mph. I know it would have been closer from a dig with his AWD, but hell next mod he gets I guess I'll bring a camera lol. He will need only a few mods to hit mid 12's so it really is a badass grocery getter with traction for those few snowy conditions we see down here. A hell of a lotta fun!:headban g:
Old 01-22-2011, 01:39 AM
  #2  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good run, those cars are definitely impressive. Especially with how massive they are.
Old 01-22-2011, 06:36 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Average Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was impressed just with the ride quality and comfort level that car possessed, He would stomp the go pedal and it was like riding on a small cloud accelerating. Just way too much $$$ in my book.
Old 01-22-2011, 10:03 AM
  #4  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Great race, thanks for sharing!

I'm not a big fan of the looks, as they are kind of bland, but I thought the same thing about the 2004 GTO's and those have grown on me alot so I'll give it some time and judge then. The performance is definitely great for the car and I bet they gain nicely with basic mods.
Old 01-22-2011, 10:07 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
egott_91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: P-Town, IN
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good race. I'm not too impressed with them though. I have a friend that has one and he couldn't beat my other friends Lincoln LS. It's tuned and put down 305 to the wheels. It's a nice car though.
Old 01-22-2011, 10:13 AM
  #6  
Staging Lane
 
Evil 'Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Manchester, Connecticut
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh yea the new Ford Taurus SomeHomo Owns is a great car
Old 01-22-2011, 11:19 AM
  #7  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

good kill! those SHO's seem like nice cars. From what i read, the 3.5 is an incredibly durable engine i wonder what its capable of when people start throwing fat turbos on em.
Old 01-22-2011, 11:35 AM
  #8  
Teching In
 
1992TsiAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by egott_91
Good race. I'm not too impressed with them though. I have a friend that has one and he couldn't beat my other friends Lincoln LS. It's tuned and put down 305 to the wheels. It's a nice car though.
The LS is the tuned car with 305rwhp?

Otherwise, I don't see that happening.
Old 01-22-2011, 11:41 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
egott_91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: P-Town, IN
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No, the SHO is tuned with that. I think the LS put down like 280ish? They went from a roll and the LS had him by a car. The SHO is quick, but it's a pig.
Old 01-22-2011, 11:58 AM
  #10  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by egott_91
The SHO is quick, but it's a pig.
The fact that it's heavy just makes it's performance more impressive. It's weight is not a huge downfall since it's a full size 4-door car, not a 2 door muscle car. The same rules don't apply to it that make people so quick to point out the massive weight of the new Camaro, Challenger, and GT500
Old 01-22-2011, 12:08 PM
  #11  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ScreaminRedZ
The fact that it's heavy just makes it's performance more impressive. It's weight is not a huge downfall since it's a full size 4-door car, not a 2 door muscle car. The same rules don't apply to it that make people so quick to point out the massive weight of the new Camaro, Challenger, and GT500
true dat. The charger people over on their boards complain that their cars too heavy (because they want to run with the 5.0 and LS3 Camaro) and i remind them that theyre driving a full sized four door car. Its heavy but it aint too heavy for what it is!!

Challenger people have room to complain though, its supposed to be a pony car!!! If dodge is gonna make a large Challenger they might as well have made a retro 2 door charger instead, at least people wouldnt complain about it being bigger!!!
Old 01-22-2011, 12:27 PM
  #12  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Evil 'Bird
oh yea the new Ford Taurus SomeHomo Owns is a great car
Wow, how long did that take you to think that up?

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
good kill! those SHO's seem like nice cars. From what i read, the 3.5 is an incredibly durable engine i wonder what its capable of when people start throwing fat turbos on em.
Doubt we'll see too much of that, but a few might pop up.
Old 01-22-2011, 12:31 PM
  #13  
Teching In
 
1992TsiAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by egott_91
No, the SHO is tuned with that. I think the LS put down like 280ish? They went from a roll and the LS had him by a car. The SHO is quick, but it's a pig.
So the LS is obviously modded.
Old 01-22-2011, 12:38 PM
  #14  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WSsick
Wow, how long did that take you to think that up?
He had a stroke of genius for sure with that "classic" line
Old 01-22-2011, 12:40 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
egott_91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: P-Town, IN
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1992TsiAWD
So the LS is obviously modded.
No, it's tuned by Brenspeed, but other than that it's stock, and the SHO is tuned by Brenspeed also.. I may be wrong on the LS's numbers, idk what they put out stock or what the numbers were after the tune, I'm just going by what I think I remember him saying, but I saw the dyno sheet for the SHO.

All I know is that the SHO lost by a car from a roll (not sure what speed)
Old 01-22-2011, 12:52 PM
  #16  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by egott_91
No, it's tuned by Brenspeed, but other than that it's stock, and the SHO is tuned by Brenspeed also.. I may be wrong on the LS's numbers, idk what they put out stock or what the numbers were after the tune...
They are only rated 280 stock. From my experience they aren't going to gain much with just a tune. Stock they are like a high 14/low 15 second car I believe.
Old 01-22-2011, 02:46 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
jeffreycastgsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ScreaminRedZ
They are only rated 280 stock. From my experience they aren't going to gain much with just a tune. Stock they are like a high 14/low 15 second car I believe.
Wait, which car you talking about? The SHO's are rated at 365hp, they run low 14's and they gain a LOT from a tune. Tune-only and its 40hp+.
Old 01-22-2011, 02:50 PM
  #18  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jeffreycastgsx
Wait, which car you talking about? The SHO's are rated at 365hp, they run low 14's and they gain a LOT from a tune. Tune-only and its 40hp+.
I was referring to the LS because he said that he didn't know what they made for horsepower stock and didn't know what his friend's made with a tune.
Old 01-22-2011, 02:53 PM
  #19  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Didn't Livernois' SHO run like a 12.9 with just a tune/intake?
Old 01-22-2011, 03:26 PM
  #20  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Didn't Livernois' SHO run like a 12.9 with just a tune/intake?
One went 12.98 @ 105 mph with a catback and mild tune and another went 12.82 @ 106 mph with an aggressive tune (and they say it did 12.78 @ 110 mph on a diferent day).

Looks like they make about 275/300 in stock form and 325/350ish with a tune. Also looks like they gain huge after 5000 rpm when tuned right.


Quick Reply: 2010 SHO vs 2000 Trans Am



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 PM.