Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Nissan 350Z kill.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2011, 08:47 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JTblack02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delaware
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Nissan 350Z kill.

My girlfriend and I were on our way to meet up with a few friends last night when a newer 350Z came up beside me. He sped away. So I caught up to him and figured he wants to play. So I dropped down into 3rd and we hit at about 45mph. Pulled away so easily, just as I got out of 3rd into 4th I was about a car length infront of him. We shut down as we approached traffic. Not sure if he had any mods done, possibly exhaust. I know this story sounds mean but hey he asked for it.
Old 06-06-2011, 09:36 AM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

its a slow car.
Old 06-06-2011, 09:26 PM
  #3  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Depends on the year 350Z. Could be anything from a low-mid 13s car, to a low 14s car. But if you were pulling away from him "so easily" in 3rd gear at 45mph, I'd guess he was in the wrong gear as well. Good kill though, anything can happen on the street.
Old 06-07-2011, 07:01 AM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JTblack02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delaware
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Depends on the year 350Z. Could be anything from a low-mid 13s car, to a low 14s car. But if you were pulling away from him "so easily" in 3rd gear at 45mph, I'd guess he was in the wrong gear as well. Good kill though, anything can happen on the street.
Thanks man. Yeah I agree.
Old 06-07-2011, 08:48 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
TheHitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Waffle Land
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good kill.
Old 06-07-2011, 08:55 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
 
Average Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have NEVER seen a stock 350 run low 13's... EVER!!! Even the stock Nismo cars were only running around 13.5s @ 104-105 with excellent DA.
Old 06-07-2011, 08:57 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
bestlude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I like how those 350z's sound like with the right exhaust set up..
Anyways Good kill OP
Old 06-08-2011, 08:46 AM
  #8  
Teching In
 
ZShot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Average Joe
I have NEVER seen a stock 350 run low 13's... EVER!!! Even the stock Nismo cars were only running around 13.5s @ 104-105 with excellent DA.
The NISMO's are a lil slower than the regular 350Z HR's. Fastest stock time for one was 13.1.
Old 06-08-2011, 09:27 AM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
 
Quick Sh0t xMLx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Average Joe
I have NEVER seen a stock 350 run low 13's... EVER!!! Even the stock Nismo cars were only running around 13.5s @ 104-105 with excellent DA.
There are like 5 guys in the whole internet that have ran that time but all the Z guys will claim that time like everyone does it. It's kind of like when people say a stock C5/F-Body is a 12.8-12.9 car. Actually it's a lot worse than that because people actually occasionally run that.

I've never in my life seen a 350Z run better than a 13.8 IRL. I know that doesn't mean anything just an observation. Never seen one modded at the track beyond an exhaust or one without a retarded driver.
Old 06-08-2011, 02:08 PM
  #10  
Staging Lane
 
Fly on the wall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've seen a few SC 350s at the track. They run mid-high 12s usually.
Old 06-08-2011, 04:44 PM
  #11  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Average Joe
I have NEVER seen a stock 350 run low 13's... EVER!!! Even the stock Nismo cars were only running around 13.5s @ 104-105 with excellent DA.
That's cool... I was just giving a possible range of times.
Old 06-08-2011, 06:20 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
 
Average Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
That's cool... I was just giving a possible range of times.

They were close, but if I saw a 350 run low 13s I would have to reevaluate my buying of a V8 F-body because that low 13 would make a 370Z a mid 12 car
Old 06-08-2011, 06:34 PM
  #13  
Teching In
 
2v-in-12's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weezieanna
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 370's were low to mid 13 sec cars. I have never seen a low 13sec stock 350. plus, they trap like 101-103, an f-body should easily pull from a roll.....


GOOD KILL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 06-08-2011, 07:54 PM
  #14  
Teching In
 
ZShot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Top 20 bone stock 350Z 1/4 mile times: (http://my350z.com/forum/drag/233840-...ons-stock.html)

1. Pat Bateman ---------------------07 Base 6spd 13.150@107.62mph 2.027 60ft
2. Veetec --------------------------07 Base 6spd 13.157@105.32mph 1.938 60ft
3. Peak350 -------------------------07 Enth 6spd 13.239@105.67mph 1.923 60ft
4. franky65 ------------------------08 Enth 6spd 13.365@106.21mph 2.083 60ft
5. Warmmilk ------------------------07 Enth 6spd 13.412@104.04mph 2.006 60ft
6. Bkennedy ------------------------07 Enth 6spd 13.476@102.90mph 2.070 60ft
7. OzzyRulez -----------------------07 Base 6spd 13.476@103.87mph 2.073 60ft
8. 2007-Z --------------------------07 Tour 6spd 13.540@102.20mph 2.068 60ft
9. PFI350Z -------------------------07 Base 6spd 13.568@104.69mph 2.159 60ft
10. Veetec -------------------------04 Base 6spd 13.640@102.42mph 1.983 60ft
11. jdifolco -----------------------07 Tour 6spd 13.644@104.68mph 2.201 60ft
12. DomZ ---------------------------03 Tour Auto 13.667@101.57mph 1.996 60ft
13. pistols07Z ---------------------07 Base 6spd 13.675@102.31mph 2.150 60ft
14. BriGuyMax ----------------------03 Tour 6spd 13.688@102.77mph 2.091 60ft
15. Ser-J --------------------------08 Nsmo 6spd 13.700@101.13mph 2.120 60ft
16. smaqaho ------------------------08 Enth 6spd 13.710@101.24mph 2.226 60ft
17. Specv_USMC ---------------------07 Base 6spd 13.711@102.88mph 2.163 60ft
18. 350zshopper --------------------07 Tour 6spd 13.733@103.22mph 2.198 60ft
19. 1.8T ---------------------------03 Base 6spd 13.736@102.99mph 2.135 60ft
20. VitViper -----------------------07 Tour 6spd 13.763@100.96mph 2.150 60ft
Old 06-08-2011, 08:10 PM
  #15  
Teching In
 
2v-in-12's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weezieanna
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I find it extremely hard to believe that a 3500lb, without driver, 306 hp, 268 ft/lb car will trap 107 and run 13.1 with a 2.02 60 ft. The mustang from 05 and up wont run that, and it weighs about the same with 52 more ft/lb of torque. 10 on down is believable, the rest are BS........No disrespect to you, just to the fantasy list
Old 06-08-2011, 08:16 PM
  #16  
Teching In
 
ZShot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2v-in-12's
I find it extremely hard to believe that a 3500lb, without driver, 306 hp, 268 ft/lb car will trap 107 and run 13.1 with a 2.02 60 ft. The mustang from 05 and up wont run that, and it weighs about the same with 52 more ft/lb of torque. 10 on down is believable, the rest are BS........No disrespect to you, just to the fantasy list
3500 lbs? Not quite.
Old 06-08-2011, 08:19 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
Average Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2v-in-12's
I find it extremely hard to believe that a 3500lb, without driver, 306 hp, 268 ft/lb car will trap 107 and run 13.1 with a 2.02 60 ft. The mustang from 05 and up wont run that, and it weighs about the same with 52 more ft/lb of torque. 10 on down is believable, the rest are BS........No disrespect to you, just to the fantasy list
My car trapped 110 in 2650 DA, with 350 whp, so a a 350 with over 100 less hp will not trap 107 unless it's negative DA, these posts are like looking at the new 5.0s running 12.2 stock LMAO. So I for one say
Old 06-08-2011, 08:26 PM
  #18  
Teching In
 
2v-in-12's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weezieanna
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry, 3339 for base.....still did not happen. Does not matter what interwebz page it is posted on.
Old 06-08-2011, 08:40 PM
  #19  
Teching In
 
ZShot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2v-in-12's
Sorry, 3339 for base.....still did not happen. Does not matter what interwebz page it is posted on.
With that logic, every f-body time posted on this site is suspect as well then... Agree?
Old 06-08-2011, 08:46 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
karpetcm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Glendale
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Damn 13.1 at 107mph is pretty impressive for an 07 350Z. My car when it was bone stock pulling more rwhp and rwtq would be hard to put that down.


Quick Reply: Nissan 350Z kill.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 AM.