Odarabla's infinite BS thread for the foreskinned (AKA Smack Down)
01-19-2013 | 11:55 PM
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Sorry man...stock internal. I'll go back and edit it.
01-20-2013 | 12:23 AM
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: DSM
Its cool and all but i just like the simplicity of NA power delivery. The consistency, and the reliability of it. Turbo cars need alot of $ into em so you never have to worry about ****. You can cheap out on **** and you'll be constantly on a mission to try and keep up with the power the car makes. Personally id be happy with a quick bolt on f-body at the moment. 115+ MPH traps would be great for a bolt on car.
But oh well, I do not have a toy car, but everything I want for one is saved cash wise. The only reason I have a loan on my jet ski is to establish credit
01-20-2013 | 12:43 AM
Banned
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: South MS
No I don't. But for about 20 years all that was available were 3 speed auto for everyones dd. Now since that is out of the way the fastest bolt-on ls1 vettes have a A4. 3 of the top 5 f-body's are A4's. So how much value does the A3 have for speed?
Ok so another excuse too make it ok
I'm sure some of the parts in said Mustang are just not street worthy to get it to 2600lb w/driver as Ohio stated, same would go for a Camaro. Use a little common sense. Drag brakes are not recommended for street use. According to some they don't even hot lap well. I'm sure it has lots of other things done that may not hold up well for street duty or make it miserable to drive.
I am sure the car is not the best for everyday use at that weight. Again we are talking about record cars so your argument is pointless.
M6 record for SI ls1 Camaro(11.2 @ 119) still has a.c. I think we can put Notches car in the top 5 for the m6 cars pretty easily if he don't tear it up first.
Ok so another excuse too make it ok
I'm sure some of the parts in said Mustang are just not street worthy to get it to 2600lb w/driver as Ohio stated, same would go for a Camaro. Use a little common sense. Drag brakes are not recommended for street use. According to some they don't even hot lap well. I'm sure it has lots of other things done that may not hold up well for street duty or make it miserable to drive.
I am sure the car is not the best for everyday use at that weight. Again we are talking about record cars so your argument is pointless.
M6 record for SI ls1 Camaro(11.2 @ 119) still has a.c. I think we can put Notches car in the top 5 for the m6 cars pretty easily if he don't tear it up first.
It also went 10.9 on a glory pass. Last edited by automach1; 01-20-2013 at 01:21 AM.
01-20-2013 | 09:11 AM
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
As far as your bold type goes....go back and read it dumbass. 2nd, 3rd, 4th are all A4's. My guess is #1 had to do with more than just a transmission because it is a big heavy T400. Matter of fact there are only 2 A3's on the list of 50.
Your arguments are always pointless because you don't know jack ****. Why don't go take the seats out of your dads gt100 and take it to the track.....just as I'm sure your dumbass has disassembled all your other cars because you thought that's how to make them faster.
Last edited by HioSSilver; 01-20-2013 at 09:26 AM.
01-20-2013 | 09:46 AM
There not really that close. I read the post on the Mach you speak of. Car was gutted and the guy could never duplicate it. Do you really think a Mach is only .1 off the 5.0 record or even comparable to a 5.0?
As far as your bold type goes....go back and read it dumbass. 2nd, 3rd, 4th are all A4's. My guess is #1 had to do with more than just a transmission because it is a big heavy T400. Matter of fact there are only 2 A3's on the list of 50.
Your arguments are always pointless because you don't know jack ****. Why don't go take the seats out of your dads gt100 and take it to the track.....just as I'm sure your dumbass has disassembled all your other cars because you thought that's how to make them faster.
As far as your bold type goes....go back and read it dumbass. 2nd, 3rd, 4th are all A4's. My guess is #1 had to do with more than just a transmission because it is a big heavy T400. Matter of fact there are only 2 A3's on the list of 50.
Your arguments are always pointless because you don't know jack ****. Why don't go take the seats out of your dads gt100 and take it to the track.....just as I'm sure your dumbass has disassembled all your other cars because you thought that's how to make them faster.
01-20-2013 | 09:57 AM
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
01-20-2013 | 11:12 AM
Banned
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: South MS
There not really that close. I read the post on the Mach you speak of. Car was gutted and the guy could never duplicate it. Do you really think a Mach is only .1 off the 5.0 record or even comparable to a 5.0?
Thats why I said Glory pass on the 10.9 however it went low 11s multiple times. So they are not close? last I checked it ran 11.0x >11.2. Gutted? It had all the interior carpet/panels so NO it was not gutted. It had raceweight that was about the same as your cut up **** box There is another mach that also ran bottom 11s but it was gutted. It did it with less boltons only making ~300 with a ~28xx raceweight. Both where manuals. As far as the 5.0 it is a second faster so no it is not a close race.
As far as your bold type goes....go back and read it dumbass. 2nd, 3rd, 4th are all A4's. My guess is #1 had to do with more than just a transmission because it is a big heavy T400. Matter of fact there are only 2 A3's on the list of 50.
I know what you where saying dumbass.
Your arguments are always pointless because you don't know jack ****. Why don't go take the seats out of your dads gt100 and take it to the track.....just as I'm sure your dumbass has disassembled all your other cars because you thought that's how to make them faster.
Thats why I said Glory pass on the 10.9 however it went low 11s multiple times. So they are not close? last I checked it ran 11.0x >11.2. Gutted? It had all the interior carpet/panels so NO it was not gutted. It had raceweight that was about the same as your cut up **** box
There is another mach that also ran bottom 11s but it was gutted. It did it with less boltons only making ~300 with a ~28xx raceweight. Both where manuals. As far as the 5.0 it is a second faster so no it is not a close race.As far as your bold type goes....go back and read it dumbass. 2nd, 3rd, 4th are all A4's. My guess is #1 had to do with more than just a transmission because it is a big heavy T400. Matter of fact there are only 2 A3's on the list of 50.
I know what you where saying dumbass.
Your arguments are always pointless because you don't know jack ****. Why don't go take the seats out of your dads gt100 and take it to the track.....just as I'm sure your dumbass has disassembled all your other cars because you thought that's how to make them faster.
The mach was the same way untill I decided too put fx1s in it. You cut your car up add raceseats/steering wheel etc... and then talk about somebody with a rearseat delete 
Oh and on the gt100 thing we can make a wager if you want too put your money where your mouth is 
01-20-2013 | 11:19 AM
http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/c...ham2012090.jpg
On a less argumentative subject. Ill be grabbing these wheels soon. Whats everyone think about the side stripe removal. Im torn. As much as i like the nostalgic effect of the stripe, i love this car without it. Any opinions?
On a less argumentative subject. Ill be grabbing these wheels soon. Whats everyone think about the side stripe removal. Im torn. As much as i like the nostalgic effect of the stripe, i love this car without it. Any opinions?
01-20-2013 | 11:21 AM
01-20-2013 | 11:25 AM
Banned
iTrader: (3)
http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/c...ham2012090.jpg
On a less argumentative subject. Ill be grabbing these wheels soon. Whats everyone think about the side stripe removal. Im torn. As much as i like the nostalgic effect of the stripe, i love this car without it. Any opinions?
On a less argumentative subject. Ill be grabbing these wheels soon. Whats everyone think about the side stripe removal. Im torn. As much as i like the nostalgic effect of the stripe, i love this car without it. Any opinions?
01-20-2013 | 11:26 AM
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: New Hampshire
01-20-2013 | 11:57 AM
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Yea because a rear seat delete and stock leather seats scream racecar The mach was the same way untill I decided too put fx1s in it. You cut your car up add raceseats/steering wheel etc... and then talk about somebody with a rearseat delete Oh and on the gt100 thing we can make a wager if you want too put your money where your mouth is
The mach was the same way untill I decided too put fx1s in it. You cut your car up add raceseats/steering wheel etc... and then talk about somebody with a rearseat delete Oh and on the gt100 thing we can make a wager if you want too put your money where your mouth is I could give to ***** less about your dads car. The fact that you dance around the subject and never have posted any real proof of anything you have done is enough proof for me and everyone else.
http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/c...ham2012090.jpg
On a less argumentative subject. Ill be grabbing these wheels soon. Whats everyone think about the side stripe removal. Im torn. As much as i like the nostalgic effect of the stripe, i love this car without it. Any opinions?
On a less argumentative subject. Ill be grabbing these wheels soon. Whats everyone think about the side stripe removal. Im torn. As much as i like the nostalgic effect of the stripe, i love this car without it. Any opinions?
01-20-2013 | 12:04 PM
Thanks man. Yea ill be picking up that exact wheel tire combo. Drops 100lbs too which is nice. The 17 inch in the front makes it look great as well as much better control too at higher speeds. Ill be running an M&H radial on the front.