BStowers023

iTrader: (1)

First run was a dig to 130, Second run was a 40 to 125. The owner said the car made 740whp Maybe you mustang guys can chime in and tell me if that's accurate. btw my car has a 100 wet shot. Videos were taken from inside my car.

http://youtu.be/5kSrn-p8i9U


Second video from a 40 roll. Apologies for video quality, Pitch black road with a cell phone....

WSsick

iTrader: (13)

Doubtful on the 740, ~200rwhp is hard to make up for even with him being heavier (unless he spun his *** off).


But good kill. Did you actually see under the hood if he had a Whipple?

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Damn.....you busted his *** pretty good......gonna be alot of crying over that.

BStowers023

iTrader: (1)

No, but did some research on the car through forums and his posts and he does have an eaton for sale and has made claims in more than a few posts about his mods and power.

I tried to get him to come talk after where we met up at but he was like "nah man I gotta go" and kept driving. Which will better help WSsick's question, I had a few mustang guru's with me and we were gonna check things out to see exactly what he was running making sure he wasn't making false claims but we did some research and it seems to be legit. He did spin but not REAL bad, he had NT05Rs and he didn't seem to be coming back on the big end.

karpetcm

iTrader: (2)

I havent seen many and thats probably why but the ones ive seen with KB's are usually around 590-610rwhp range which is in the 700's under the hood. I dont know what boost he is running or all the mods. Either way OP good kill its a fast mustang you beat either way.

BStowers023

iTrader: (1)

Did some research and the average for a 2.9 whipple 2010 GT500 is between 690-750whp it seems like so I don't think he was claiming 740 flywheel and he said the car was dyno tuned at JMS. I just wish I could have got some pics of the car and motor, it was a real clean nice car.

Burken01

iTrader: (88)

What head and cam package do you run OP? Nice run, and I'm just curious because I'm a h/c/I/nitrous person myself and to take down a 700 plus car is awesome!!

assasinator

look at it like this... you beat a car that has 460rwhp stock , and with his mods 600-750rwhp.

its a good kill.

BayArea ws6

Nice kill!I'm also curious about your H/C/I setup .

ohioborn80

iTrader: (2)

Nice Kill. 600whp or 740whp he got spanked. ON the roll race he didn't sound like he spun so maybe he isn't making what he said or he is the worse driver ever.

BStowers023

iTrader: (1)

cam is a raptr cam 236/242 .615/.615 111LSA, heads are ported 853s.

why87

Get yourself at least a set of ported 241's or better and smoke him even moar

WSsick

iTrader: (13)

853s are basically the same as 241s, doubt he'd see much gain. Besides, a set of used 243s can go for like $300, why not just toss on in that case?

BStowers023

iTrader: (1)

I'm still on the stock 10 bolt and T56...both of those will be upgraded before heads lol.

BayArea ws6

I bet ur trans would last longer than the stock axles and drive shaft,i would upgrade those along with the rear end b4 the t56.

Heater

Good Kill OP

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

No doubt . I busted 2 axles this year with the same power and I probably weigh less than his set up.

Sticks n Stones

I gotta commend you on the very obvious blowout win first and foremost. and for you too have a passenger when you are down that much on horsepower is just tempting fate.

But... even with him losing 70-80rwhp from heat soak (assuming he was heat soaked), he should still have beat you. period. unless you got alot of weight loss, with you having a buddy in the car your car weights would be within 300-400 pounds; that equals 30-40rwhp equivelant. Toss in another 50rwhp which seems to be the norm when comparing lsx engines to forced induction mustangs and he still should have been able to beat you.

BStowers023

iTrader: (1)

His car was sitting for about 30 minutes before we ran, he also had a passenger....

BayAreaSS

iTrader: (10)

Nice kill