ScreaminRedZ

iTrader: (3)

Kind of a vague statement. They should trap that in decent conditions with good driving, but I'd say that's a bit optimistic for what generally happens.

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

You have an endless bag of excuses. I counted 7 excuses in that post as to why a slow bolt on 4.6L N/A Mustang walked a full bolt on LS1.

Good God, Sepno himself is a much better sport than you are. Now I know why you need a 427 and a built rear to run me. If I beat you I bet we would never hear from you again.

Heater

They have a factory modded Coyote engine.

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

Bullshit, all bolt on LS1 cars trap 112-120mph and run anywhere from low 12's to low 11's.

evangto87

iTrader: (6)

In simple terms... its a H/C/I coyote motor... cnc ported heads, more aggressive cams... and a short runner intake manifold.

evangto87

iTrader: (6)

so your saying your car with 20-30 more hp would trap 117mph? And average bolt ons id say would be more like 110-112. Anything more then that is strong running for what it is. And he may be on drag radials... but if hes coming out soft... he is wasting a lot of time getting the car up to speed. What i would be more curious to know is what his car traps in the 8th mile.

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

I like this guy. Not brand loyal to the point of being unrealistic like some of the others here.

IMO bolt on LS1s run 110-112mph and cam only LS1s run 114-117mph. But hey this said 117mph car could have higher compression and worked heads for all we know. Still 12.3@117mph is pathetic.

Dwhilljr

12.3 117 Pathetic??? Ok I though it was pretty good for a daily driver

evangto87

iTrader: (6)

I just dont understand why the Ford guys over rate the fords and under rate the chevys and why the chevy guys over rate the chevys and under rate the fords. The 2 biggest aspects that will change how a car will run for what it has, is driver, and Da/weather. With the same parts... the cars will make the same hp give or take 5-10hp. Ive seen modded Mach 1s make over 300whp run consistant 13.2-13.4s at 107-108 on the exact same day and track i would see a better driver take a stock mach 1 with 270whp to run 12.7 at 107. No his car is not a freak.... no the modded one is not a slouch.. On the roll, the modded one will pull while in the gear but fall a little more on the shift. The power is there, the driver is not. The same thing goes with F bodies. The strongest bolt on factory weight F body i have seen in person went 12.1 at 113.7 (ill give him 114mph because he was on the limiter for the last 50 ft in 4th gear). That kid could drive the ***** off anything. The car was strong on the roll... but it couldnt even get close to 117mph and it had 4.10s. Im willing to bet that with a stock set of 243 heads.. it still wouldnt do 117mph. Not without some weight reduction and more aggressive launching.

Dwhilljr

Well the simple truth is I have $7500.00 in a 12 second car, not too shabby no matter what type of car it is

Mike Morris

iTrader: (55)

You have a heads cam LS1 and you bad mouth Fords. Hmm let me make a post on here saying my Mustang has yet to run any LS1 anything from a dig and lose. Newsflash you are not that fast even though you killed a few local OKIEs

I can't wait to do another n/a Mustang. Once my Supra is done its on......

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Not really, that's been my experiance. Not very hard to a ls 1 over 110.
The difference between me and Sepno is I would've outran you both places. I would not say you walked him....actually you holeshotted him. He walked you on the street.
rule of thumb, every 10hp = 1mph
Jesus, how much gear did he have in that thing? The car should go faster than that with 4.10's and a stock limiter.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

I gues because I like to accelerate for more than the first 60'
Since you brought my car into it. Would you rather have a car that goes 11.1 @ 119 or a car that goes 11.1@ 126+

If your list my mods don't forget stock longblock ls6.

marc97taws6

iTrader: (6)

I wouldn't mind a 12.3@117mph car right now (coming from the old LT1 owner)

Your times are correct above on bolt on LS1 times/traps
With this state of mind, you should own a boosted Honda
The faster one, duh

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

Well no ****, a bolt on Mach 1 would lose to a swappedmotoredmassiveweightreductionedaeromodified faceplatedtransfullbolton400rwhpfbody.

why87

you guys must really not have much else to do.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

I'm talkin bout me goin over Sep's car and driving it, I should've been more clear.....no doubt my car would not even be fair.

With what I know now I could get a pretty much full weight bolt-on ls1 to trap 115+ that would made low 12's a snap.

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

Oh so with you driving you would have picked up over half a second.

evangto87

iTrader: (6)

His car had the factory rev limiter and 4.10 gears paired with a 275/40/17 DR. Max speed in fourth was 113.7. And every 10hp equaling 1 mph only works out to a certain point.. you dont see guys that are trapping over 120 going by that theory...And even then...going by that theory... If you picked up 20 hp by going to the 243s... thats still only 2mph. So now your 112mph car does 114mph... still not 117mph. But regardless... lets say his car does do 12.3 at 117. Give me a set of drag radials and let me side step the clutch at 5k and run into the 11s with a stock car... so much for needing a mean ford to hang with his f body.

ScreaminRedZ

iTrader: (3)

The fastest (trap speed) I've heard of for a bolt-on 6-speed fbody is Demonicbird00's car. He went 117 mph with a good amount of weight reduction and in stellar weather conditions. 115+ with a full weight car is mostly likely going to take great weather/track conditions as well. Possible for sure, but I doubt it would be the norm.