Chased down an srt8 today...
04-20-2012, 10:45 PM
#81
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Edgewater FL. but, Jersey for life!
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey...i'm just reporting the news...i have no reason to make this **** up. this is what happened. i don't know why. it just did...no excuses and no fables.
04-20-2012, 10:46 PM
#82
I already win dipshit...
04-20-2012, 10:46 PM
#83
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not saying you made it up. Because anything can happen on the street. A stock 98 SS vert with the top down just gave me and an 03 Cobra a hard time this weekend. **** happens lol
04-20-2012, 10:51 PM
#85
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Edgewater FL. but, Jersey for life!
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
true that. i ran side by side from a dig with a 2010 vette to 110 before we hit traffic. people can talk all the crap they want...i was there and i know what happened...lol.
04-20-2012, 10:52 PM
#86
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
bolt on mach 1's are a joke just like their owners. I was suppose to race a full bolt on geared and tuned mach 1 this past weekend but he sold it for an LS1....I wonder why
04-20-2012, 10:59 PM
#87
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In stock form the 6.1 SRT-8's were not that impressive. I'm not saying my car can outrun it, but considering it's got 425HP it sure doesn't move like it.
04-20-2012, 11:00 PM
#88
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice ricer excuse....Boo hoo who cares if its $10,000 or $100,000 pull your skirt down you vagina. its 4200 f*ckin pounds, with leather seats, touch screen, rear seats and the size of a tank and it still smokes your lightweight bolt on geared mustardstain....
bolt on mach 1's are a joke just like their owners. I was suppose to race a full bolt on geared and tuned mach 1 this past weekend but he sold it for an LS1....I wonder why
bolt on mach 1's are a joke just like their owners. I was suppose to race a full bolt on geared and tuned mach 1 this past weekend but he sold it for an LS1....I wonder why
04-20-2012, 11:02 PM
#89
Nice ricer excuse....Boo hoo who cares if its $10,000 or $100,000 pull your skirt down you vagina. its 4200 f*ckin pounds, with leather seats, touch screen, rear seats and the size of a tank and it still smokes your lightweight bolt on geared mustardstain....
bolt on mach 1's are a joke just like their owners. I was suppose to race a full bolt on geared and tuned mach 1 this past weekend but he sold it for an LS1....I wonder why
bolt on mach 1's are a joke just like their owners. I was suppose to race a full bolt on geared and tuned mach 1 this past weekend but he sold it for an LS1....I wonder why
I've asked you before to get someone with a stock 392 to meet me at the track...hasn't happened yet. Surely someone in Atlanta or around has a 392 they race!
04-20-2012, 11:04 PM
#90
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-20-2012, 11:07 PM
#93
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a well known fact that in stock form these 6.1 SRT-8's were getting beat by the 5.0 Mustangs and even the 6.2 Camaros.
04-20-2012, 11:08 PM
#94
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lol, please. I really don't want to start ****, but I think it's kind of pathetic how everyone clings to the fastest recorded time of their car in "stock" form. Fastest LS1 was what, 12.8 seconds? I really do not care.
It's a well known fact that in stock form these 6.1 SRT-8's were getting beat by the 5.0 Mustangs and even the 6.2 Camaros.
It's a well known fact that in stock form these 6.1 SRT-8's were getting beat by the 5.0 Mustangs and even the 6.2 Camaros.
Heres another 6.1 running in the 12's bone stock. They are plenty capable of doing it but most drivers cant.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ryiFP37S_Y
and you can say whats not impressive and all but bottom line is I have 3 mods and I run with lighter cars like 03 cobras and 5.0's
$150 handheld predator tune
$150 CAI
$24 Thermostat
04-20-2012, 11:09 PM
#95
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Edgewater FL. but, Jersey for life!
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lol, please. I really don't want to start ****, but I think it's kind of pathetic how everyone clings to the fastest recorded time of their car in "stock" form. Fastest LS1 was what, 12.8 seconds? I really do not care.
It's a well known fact that in stock form these 6.1 SRT-8's were getting beat by the 5.0 Mustangs and even the 6.2 Camaros.
It's a well known fact that in stock form these 6.1 SRT-8's were getting beat by the 5.0 Mustangs and even the 6.2 Camaros.
04-20-2012, 11:16 PM
#97
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lol, please. I really don't want to start ****, but I think it's kind of pathetic how everyone clings to the fastest recorded time of their car in "stock" form. Fastest LS1 was what, 12.8 seconds? I really do not care.
It's a well known fact that in stock form these 6.1 SRT-8's were getting beat by the 5.0 Mustangs and even the 6.2 Camaros.
It's a well known fact that in stock form these 6.1 SRT-8's were getting beat by the 5.0 Mustangs and even the 6.2 Camaros.
Saying they get beat by a 5.0 doesnt mean theyre slow for 425hp. The 5.0 is 41xHP in a 3600lb shell vs 425hp in a 4200lb shell. Of course its faster, going by the numbers it should be a TON faster but its not.
As for the 5th gens, with all things being equal the LS3 is a tick faster and the 6.1 is a tick faster than the L99. Again not bad considering its the same power as a LS3 with 400 more lbs!!!
Id have to say it actully runs pretty damn good for only 425hp comapared to the others...
04-20-2012, 11:36 PM
#99
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-20-2012, 11:52 PM
#100
Teching In
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont get the arguments about weight and engine size. Dodge decided to go with more horsepower and not shed weight down....its all the same as going light weight with a smaller displacement engine.
There are lots of other things to look at aside from horsepower ratings, like actual torque and horsepower curves. I know the new RT's are really underated because they run low 13's but are only advertised at 390hp.
And stopsign...you post so much bullshit i think your actually starting to believe it.
There are lots of other things to look at aside from horsepower ratings, like actual torque and horsepower curves. I know the new RT's are really underated because they run low 13's but are only advertised at 390hp.
And stopsign...you post so much bullshit i think your actually starting to believe it.