Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

intake only 2006 GTO vs eaton swapped Mach 1 **VID**

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2012, 06:35 PM
  #141  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redfire 03
Im aware of what they make. Plenty of experience with and around these cars. Like I said, cams and/or Ported intakes don't count!



This your typical, run of the mill, 95 percentile Bolt-on Mach 1:

Headers
Mid-pipe
Cat-back
90mm MAF
Intake Spacer
JLT RAI

315/336.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXG1N...e_gdata_player

Add pulleys, 12lb flywheel, EWP...and add a few more. But they will not make 340-350rwhp. That's Full bolt-on LS1 M6 range.
Lol Corys car was put together with a budget in mind. Yes I know the car. My car was put on the same dyno made 308std without a ported stock mani, headers, ewp, t/b etc.. In a auto... Here is a 5 spd full bolt-on car on the same dyno.

http://www.mach1registry.org/forums/...d.php?t=116237
Old 05-08-2012, 06:37 PM
  #142  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
Arent there some challenger R/Ts out there you should be racing
I've ran R/Ts and I simply will not waste my gas on them anymore. They should be left to the 2v's.
Old 05-08-2012, 06:38 PM
  #143  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
I know, I'm just pointing out you can't say a Mach 1 with bolt ons "can't make 345+rwhp on a dyno" when infact it can. BUT I will agree with you in saying it CANNOT on a SAE corrected dyno. Anything is possible on a dynojet though.
Record is 343sae for a bolt on c headed car.
Old 05-08-2012, 06:43 PM
  #144  
On The Tree
 
Heater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I felt like I needed to post in this thread.


The is rather entertaining.
Old 05-08-2012, 06:44 PM
  #145  
Launching!
 
Redfire 03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I'm sure the 122 was in a full on racecar. I think someone could get one to go 118-120 and still have their self a decent street car.
Depends on ones idea of a decent street car. lol I know one thing, its going to take a lot of weight out
to trap those numbers, big gears, front runners, etc.. Don't know about "street car".
Old 05-08-2012, 06:53 PM
  #146  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V8EATR
Well my mustang did 110 trap with 3360lb and 330whp and my buddies cobra did 111 with 3320 and XXXwhp. Do the math. Not to bench race but its probably right around 340whp. BTW, that was same track, same day both have driver mod, both on street tires.
My 3v made 330std before longtubes (shortys) Same mods as yours for the most part. At a 3460lb raceweight best trap was 111.25 . Mach mad 308std weight around the same weight if not A little more and traped 111.9
Old 05-08-2012, 06:57 PM
  #147  
Launching!
 
Redfire 03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
Lol Corys car was put together with a budget in mind. Yes I know the car. My car was put on the same dyno made 308std without a ported stock mani, headers, ewp, t/b etc.. In a auto... Here is a 5 spd full bolt-on car on the same dyno.

http://www.mach1registry.org/forums/...d.php?t=116237
Again, I AM NOT TALKING CAMMED CARS. Production cam or not, strictly "Bolt-on" mods.

Some guys have seen 20whp by swapping '98 Cams on a C-Headed motor. Take away that from his numbers and you've got a typical full bolt-on Mach 1. Nothing special.
Old 05-08-2012, 07:07 PM
  #148  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redfire 03
Again, I AM NOT TALKING CAMMED CARS. Production cam or not, strictly "Bolt-on" mods.

Some guys have seen 20whp by swapping '98 Cams on a C-Headed motor. Take away that from his numbers and you've got a typical full bolt-on Mach 1. Nothing special.
It is not a cammed car it only effects the intake side more like 10 anyways. It is considerd a bolt on car the record car made 343sae
Old 05-08-2012, 07:29 PM
  #149  
Launching!
 
Redfire 03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
It is not a cammed car it only effects the intake side more like 10 anyways. It is considerd a bolt on car the record car made 343sae
Give me a break man.

I'm aware they're only the intake cams. Why some of the Ford enthusiasts continue to try and teach me things I learned 10 years ago I will never know. Cut it out with the non sense. Not a bolt-on car for sure.

I had several buddies that performed the swap. You'll typically see 13-20rwhp gains. This guy in the thread below saw 20.

http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...questions.html
Old 05-08-2012, 08:03 PM
  #150  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
FirebirdTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlkMach1
Oh how I wish I still had my "turd".... There are machs that race in the orlando area often and they post the videos on svtp, I'm sure they'd be honored to shut that big mouth.
Where are these mythical beasts you speak of?
Old 05-08-2012, 08:05 PM
  #151  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
FirebirdTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After 8 pages of people talking sh't, we have all forgotten why we are here.

A intake only GTO beat a eaton swapped Mach 1. (in reality)

Ball is in your court Mach 1 co'cksuckers, let's see some proof.
Old 05-08-2012, 08:15 PM
  #152  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FirebirdTransAm
Ball is in your court Mach 1 co'cksuckers, let's see some proof.
Post up your proof of what your car runs and us Mach 1 co'cksuckers will post up our proof.
Old 05-08-2012, 08:22 PM
  #153  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sho did get quiet in here
Old 05-08-2012, 08:24 PM
  #154  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
FirebirdTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Post up your proof of what your car runs and us Mach 1 co'cksuckers will post up our proof.
It's not about what my car runs. It's about a GTO with an intake pulling a eaton swapped Mach 1 and getting it on video so we can all laugh together
Old 05-08-2012, 08:33 PM
  #155  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Post up your proof of what your car runs and us Mach 1 co'cksuckers will post up our proof.
When are we going to actually see you run something instead of talking about it?
Old 05-08-2012, 08:33 PM
  #156  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redfire 03
Give me a break man.

I'm aware they're only the intake cams. Why some of the Ford enthusiasts continue to try and teach me things I learned 10 years ago I will never know. Cut it out with the non sense. Not a bolt-on car for sure.

I had several buddies that performed the swap. You'll typically see 13-20rwhp gains. This guy in the thread below saw 20.

http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...questions.html
So now it is not a bolt-on because you said so I guess ported stock mani is not a bolt-on either
Old 05-08-2012, 08:34 PM
  #157  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FirebirdTransAm
It's not about what my car runs. It's about a GTO with an intake pulling a eaton swapped Mach 1 and getting it on video so we can all laugh together
I pullled a h/c gto when I made 298 just saying It works both ways.

Last edited by automach1; 05-08-2012 at 08:48 PM.
Old 05-08-2012, 08:37 PM
  #158  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
I pullled a h/c gto when I made 298 and weight reduction just saying It works both ways.
Fixed it...lol
Old 05-08-2012, 08:37 PM
  #159  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,937
Received 429 Likes on 338 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Redfire 03
Depends on ones idea of a decent street car. lol I know one thing, its going to take a lot of weight out
to trap those numbers, big gears, front runners, etc.. Don't know about "street car".
My car traps 126+(best of 130). It's a street car, my dd actually. With that said my ls6 only makes about 60 more rwhp than a full bolt-on ls1. For you non-math types that would equal to about 6mph less. Definitely possible.
Old 05-08-2012, 08:38 PM
  #160  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
When are we going to actually see you run something instead of talking about it?
Theres video and timeslips...what else do you need? That is real world numbers that you can go off.


Quick Reply: intake only 2006 GTO vs eaton swapped Mach 1 **VID**



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 AM.