Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

ZL1 vs. GT500 Insideline (Bittersweet)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2012, 04:31 PM
  #61  
TECH Fanatic
 
nmass399's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hattiesburg, Ms
Posts: 1,244
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
No problem you proved a good point. Just was wondering how much power can the zl1 handle and somone mentioned it didn't have forged internals
Thats one thing i have been curious about also, they seem to be holding up pretty good as of now. The pistons are quote "High-strength hypereutectic pistons" from allenginelist.com and the rods are forged powder metal with a forged crank. It has the piston oil squirters which helps keep heat out of the pistons and cylinder which also helps detonation.

There are people putting down 700+ with these engines in the ZL1 right now. 10 or more years ago people would probably think your crazy or not believe you if you were running that much power on a hypereutectic or basic cast aluminum piston.
Old 06-12-2012, 05:27 PM
  #62  
Staging Lane
 
2SSARME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: I'm a Moderator
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

well...

We do live in a year and age where you can take faggoty 1.8L 4cyl engines to 600-700rwhp. So I believe just about anything is possible.
Old 06-12-2012, 07:09 PM
  #63  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 2SSARME
well...

We do live in a year and age where you can take faggoty 1.8L 4cyl engines to 600-700rwhp. So I believe just about anything is possible.
Old 06-12-2012, 07:16 PM
  #64  
ASSuming On The Tree
 
audacious nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2SSARME
well...

We do live in a year and age where you can take faggoty 1.8L 4cyl engines to 600-700rwhp. So I believe just about anything is possible.
****, 1.3l haybusa engines are putting down 5-600rwhp.
Old 06-12-2012, 09:17 PM
  #65  
Launching!
 
Driver_10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by odthetruth
fewer people are looking at how great it handles, and more are looking at how it does in a 1/4.
Not so sure if I agree with this. A lot of popular emphasis has been turning towards handling these days.

Ill be frank and just say it... going fast is easy and you don't have to be smart to do it.
Old 06-12-2012, 11:24 PM
  #66  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
enginjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 679
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If they really cared about handling, they would drop the weight by 500 lbs. What a pig. I saw a vid of a Boss 302 with a couple mods and a tune beating one from a 40 roll. I hope that thing can take a pulley swap to make some more power to haul all that flubber around.
Old 06-12-2012, 11:59 PM
  #67  
Staging Lane
 
2SSARME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: I'm a Moderator
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by enginjoe
if they really cared about handling, they would drop the weight by 500 lbs. What a pig. I saw a vid of a boss 302 with a couple mods and a tune beating one from a 40 roll. I hope that thing can take a pulley swap to make some more power to haul all that flubber around.
cts-v.
Old 06-13-2012, 03:53 AM
  #68  
Staging Lane
 
41863nj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OHIOBORN..motor tend got a 11.6 out of the ZL1???...when was this ?? i subscribe to that mag...the best i have seen was a 12.1@117.4 in the march 2012 issue...i am not at doubting you just that i was not aware of another test...what issue was it in ??? as i said, i own every issue for about 9 years now and have never seen anything in ''motortrend'' that backs this up...yes the zl1 has dipped into the 11's, but not by motertrend...car&driver got a 12.3@119mph...
Old 06-13-2012, 05:05 AM
  #69  
Launching!
 
Driver_10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by enginjoe
If they really cared about handling, they would drop the weight by 500 lbs. What a pig. I saw a vid of a Boss 302 with a couple mods and a tune beating one from a 40 roll. I hope that thing can take a pulley swap to make some more power to haul all that flubber around.
Agreed... The car is really too heavy, which makes the fact that its faster around the track then an M3 all the more remarkable.

I'm biding my time waiting for the 2014-15 model when they start building on the new lighter-weight Caddy chassis.

At that point, 550-580hp will be more than adequate.
Old 06-13-2012, 09:11 AM
  #70  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
evangto87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nmass399
Thats one thing i have been curious about also, they seem to be holding up pretty good as of now. The pistons are quote "High-strength hypereutectic pistons" from allenginelist.com and the rods are forged powder metal with a forged crank. It has the piston oil squirters which helps keep heat out of the pistons and cylinder which also helps detonation.

There are people putting down 700+ with these engines in the ZL1 right now. 10 or more years ago people would probably think your crazy or not believe you if you were running that much power on a hypereutectic or basic cast aluminum piston.
u mean the rotating assembly isnt even forged? ugh
Old 06-13-2012, 09:43 AM
  #71  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by evangto87
u mean the rotating assembly isnt even forged? ugh
Yeah that why I didn't even look so much into it because I assumed it was.
Old 06-13-2012, 09:43 AM
  #72  
Teching In
 
m_liel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 41863nj
OHIOBORN..motor tend got a 11.6 out of the ZL1???...when was this ?? i subscribe to that mag...the best i have seen was a 12.1@117.4 in the march 2012 issue...i am not at doubting you just that i was not aware of another test...what issue was it in ??? as i said, i own every issue for about 9 years now and have never seen anything in ''motortrend'' that backs this up...yes the zl1 has dipped into the 11's, but not by motertrend...car&driver got a 12.3@119mph...
I think he meant GT500.
Old 06-13-2012, 09:52 AM
  #73  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
hugger1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Naperville
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

I'm still lol at faggoty 1.something engines
Old 06-13-2012, 10:18 AM
  #74  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 41863nj
OHIOBORN..motor tend got a 11.6 out of the ZL1???...when was this ?? i subscribe to that mag...the best i have seen was a 12.1@117.4 in the march 2012 issue...i am not at doubting you just that i was not aware of another test...what issue was it in ??? as i said, i own every issue for about 9 years now and have never seen anything in ''motortrend'' that backs this up...yes the zl1 has dipped into the 11's, but not by motertrend...car&driver got a 12.3@119mph...
As above that what they took.the GT500 to.
Old 06-13-2012, 10:28 AM
  #75  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NOLAG05
I think heat soak will happen in the bigger Eaton TVS2300 before the smaller 1900 of the ZL1 correct? Quick question... if i put a TVS 2300 in the ZL that should be the major difference maker correct? i could b wrong... also going off the no replacement for displacement if given the blower being the TVS 2300 the bigger 6.2 of the Camaro will(should) outperform the smaller 5.8 of the Shelby? I'm no engineer so take for what its worth, just asking general questions...lol
Originally Posted by audacious nick
A TVS2300 would make a huge difference, seeing as they're capable of 800rwhp+. The biggest issue is the lack of forged internals, which I honestly don't understand.
But swapping a TVS2300 onto the 6.2l would probably yield higher results, assuming you have a proper cam setup as well.
I could be wrong, but I believe it has been tried with CTS-V's and didn't show much gain if any. This could also be due to a better intercooler design on the V's because there is more room under the hood than there is with a ZR1.

I believe the CTS-V record for stock displacement, stock blower (ported though) is like 9.9 @ 139 mph. 700+ rwhp through the auto.

Originally Posted by NemeSS
Wishful thinking about GM
GM could have easily dropped in the ls9 in the zl1. Easily. And underated to lower hp/tq figures at lower rpm. with the same mods the vettes are getting. It would be a monster. it is a very strong powerful performer, but the ford fanbois will find anything to discredit it.
I wish they would have gone with the LS9 also, but it might be better that they didn't. Probably dyno 40 more rwhp and still get beat up with nowhere left to go (from the factory) unless they came out with a new engine.

It is stupid that GM holds back the Camaro due to the vette. No one with any sense would think the two cars would perform the same when one weighs so much more.

Originally Posted by evangto87
u mean the rotating assembly isnt even forged? ugh
I'm not sure why they didn't forge the rotating assembly (cost probably, knowing GM), but they seem to be holding up well. People have made 650-700 rwhp on blower and then sprayed on top of that without issue.
Old 06-13-2012, 10:32 AM
  #76  
Launching!
 
regblkss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If GM is worried about stepping on Corvette toes. Then bump the vette up as well. Give the base vette z06 power and weight. And then give the zl1 the ls9 and lose 300 pounds. Problem solved
Old 06-13-2012, 11:04 AM
  #77  
TECH Enthusiast
 
wicked383lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: En Casa del Carajo
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Does this mean I need to mod up to start the race on the hwy on ramps now...damn ZL1!
Old 06-13-2012, 11:17 AM
  #78  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
PewterScreaminMach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'm pretty sure GM stated right from the start that the ZL1 was specifically being designed to perform as a badass on the road course. I don't know why people are saying they need to figure out what they want to do with the car. The very first article I ever read on it when they first officially announced it was all about how it was being designed to handle and perform well on the road course. If you disagree with their purpose for the car, that's one thing, but they never gave the impression of trying to make it anything other than a strong performer on the road course. Everyone - magazines, manufacturers, etc - does 1/4 mile testing on their vehicles, but it doesn't mean that was the purpose of the car.

I also doubt anyone at the time of the ZL1 designing expected Ford to drop a super-underrated, 600 rwhp bomb on the market. It clearly wasn't anticipated by GM (or anyone else, for that matter, including even most Ford enthusiasts considering all of the shock and over-joyed reactions going around). The car makes 100 more rwhp than the ZL1 and weighs less, but judging by the twisty numbers we're seeing so far, it looks like the ZL1 is holding up in the area it was designed for based on the design that was seen through to completion, which was long-finished before Ford put the '13 GT500 on the market and people realized the kind of power it actually makes.

The fact that Ford can do whatever the hell they want with the GT500 since it's their current top of the line performance vehicle is also a good point. Whether you agree with it or not (and I personally don't), GM clearly doesn't want to outgun the Corvette with any version of the Camaro, so until a major upgrade happens to the ZR1, I don't see them putting a 600rwhp Camaro on the market to compete with the GT500 in a straight line. Until the '13 GT500 hit the dyno and track publicly, they probably didn't think they had to to at least keep things in the same ball park.

Last edited by PewterScreaminMach; 06-13-2012 at 11:37 AM.
Old 06-13-2012, 11:25 AM
  #79  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
enginjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 679
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I think it's just the pistons and that aren't forged.
Old 06-13-2012, 11:37 AM
  #80  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by regblkss
If GM is worried about stepping on Corvette toes. Then bump the vette up as well. Give the base vette z06 power and weight. And then give the zl1 the ls9 and lose 300 pounds. Problem solved
Lol that's what i said or ment and some laugh at the idea.


Quick Reply: ZL1 vs. GT500 Insideline (Bittersweet)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 PM.