Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Me vs Turbo Civic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2012, 01:34 PM
  #181  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
V8EATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

so I spoke with some more of my honda friends last night and gathered some info. They say on a STOCK b18 GSR, your average turbo @10psi is good for 320 or so. Interwebz seem to indicate 280-340, in that range. So a b16 would be even less. Again I'm not concerned with a stock full weight b series anything with 10psi.

You can claim different all you want. Truth is if I can find one and race it, I will and I will get it on video and I will post it up.
V8EATR is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 01:34 PM
  #182  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
V8EATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NOLAG05
I'm confussed... who won cause dude in the vid said he let out...
He let out for traffic, just like I did. Race ended about that same spot as the first one, maybe a couple mph less. I won, but just barely. As you can see, he let out BEHIND me, making it a victory for myself.
V8EATR is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 01:37 PM
  #183  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NOLAG05
I'm confussed... who won cause dude in the vid said he let out...
Coming back hard and let out, def needs a driver mod.


Originally Posted by V8EATR
so I spoke with some more of my honda friends last night and gathered some info. They say on a STOCK b18 GSR, your average turbo @10psi is good for 320 or so. Interwebz seem to indicate 280-340, in that range. So a b16 would be even less. Again I'm not concerned with a stock full weight b series anything with 10psi.

You can claim different all you want. Truth is if I can find one and race it, I will and I will get it on video and I will post it up.
Most turbo Vtec motors make similar power (do to head flow and compression), when your on boost displacement doesn't matter. Its all about turbo size and psi. The motors that have trouble breaking the 3's on boost are the LS (b18b or b18a) and the B20s because of lower compression and worse headflow. My buddy had a gt30r dual ball bearing at 10psi.
adamantium is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 01:42 PM
  #184  
Teching In
 
LightningTeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis Area
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by adamantium
That is terrible. Also my buddy was on a gt30r turbo. Why you are comparing dyno numbers of a Mazda to a Honda is ridiculous. Compression, head flow, turbo size is all reasons why the b16 made the power it made. Seriously just stop.


Also i could careless if you "cant see it" , bottom line it made the power and it went out and proved it on the street.
My stock LS made about the same amount of power at 10-11psi with a GT25/28r. Very fun, autox friendly. I miss it
LightningTeg is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 01:44 PM
  #185  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LightningTeg
My stock LS made about the same amount of power at 10-11psi with a GT25/28r. Very fun, autox friendly. I miss it
lol psssh look what you have now though! Honestly love the simplicity of a stock turbo b-series and the power they make, my buddy made low threes through a turd ebay cast log manifold.
adamantium is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 01:44 PM
  #186  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
V8EATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by adamantium
Coming back hard and let out, def needs a driver mod.




Most turbo Vtec motors make similar power (do to head flow and compression), when your on boost displacement doesn't matter. Its all about turbo size and psi. The motors that have trouble breaking the 3's on boost are the LS (b18b or b18a) and the B20s because of lower compression and worse headflow. My buddy had a gt30r dual ball bearing at 10psi.
displacement does matter, Ill give it to ya probably not that much with .2 liters and most everything else being equal.
V8EATR is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 01:46 PM
  #187  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V8EATR
displacement does matter, Ill give it to ya probably not that much with .2 liters and most everything else being equal.
No it doesn't. All displacement does is change the way the turbo will spool. But power on a turbo motor is all based off of the turbo. Perfect example why do you think people turbo 4.8s and 5.3 LSx make 600 instead of turbo an LS1? Cheaper and literally on boost all displacement does is spool your turbo faster. What makes the power on a turbo motor is the turbo. Compression and headflow dictates how much boost you need to run through it to achieve the power though and guess what b16s and gsr heads flow VERY close to each other and make similar compression. Man ive been around ALOT of turbo hondas and if displacement mattered these things would NOT make the power they make on the PSI they make.

Last edited by adamantium; 07-12-2012 at 01:58 PM.
adamantium is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 02:06 PM
  #188  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So if displacement doesn't matter, then why do big v8s with turbos have better powerbands than little 4 bangers?
why87 is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 02:09 PM
  #189  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by why87
So if displacement doesn't matter, then why do big v8s with turbos have better powerbands than little 4 bangers?
That is not what we are arguing. But i already covered that...Read. A V8 will ALWAYS have a broader power band than any smaller motors, its common sense.
adamantium is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 02:17 PM
  #190  
Staging Lane
 
2SSARME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: I'm a Moderator
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Why does an X900 AMS Evo running twin 6265 at 35-40psi make 780awhp, yet a TT V8 with same turbo at 10psi will make 700rwhp?
2SSARME is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 02:21 PM
  #191  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2SSARME
Why does an X900 AMS Evo running twin 6265 at 35-40psi make 780awhp, yet a TT V8 with same turbo at 10psi will make 700rwhp?
marc97taws6 is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 02:25 PM
  #192  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adamantium
That is not what we are arguing. But i already covered that...Read. A V8 will ALWAYS have a broader power band than any smaller motors, its common sense.
Right....and guess the reason....displacement!! Sure, anything with the right amount of boost can make 1000 peak hp, but a smaller motor won't make it where it matters like a bigger motor will (Less TQ also). Displacement does make a difference.
why87 is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 02:37 PM
  #193  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2SSARME
Why does an X900 AMS Evo running twin 6265 at 35-40psi make 780awhp, yet a TT V8 with same turbo at 10psi will make 700rwhp?

Read that wrong. AMS's evo is not twin turbo by the way. Also comparing dyno numbers of an AWD car to a rwd is idiotic. 2ssderp has done it again.


Originally Posted by why87
Right....and guess the reason....displacement!! Sure, anything with the right amount of boost can make 1000 peak hp, but a smaller motor won't make it where it matters like a bigger motor will (Less TQ also). Displacement does make a difference.
We are not talking powerband here, like i said go back and read please.

But since i apparently need to dumb it down for you here.


Okay a turbo motor makes power when the turbo spools correct? Which motor on lets say for example on a 70mm journal bearing turbo will spool the turbo faster, an LS1 (5.7l) or a b16 (1.6l)? Ding ding ding the LS1, the power will come in faster (broader powerband) But lets put the correct size turbo that is dual ball bearing on a b16 that will spool VERY early, Now what do you have? A broad powerband aswell? See what im getting at? A turbo motor rely's solely on the turbo, like i previously stated. For example look at srt4s on stock turbo srt4s they will make 100+wtrq more than they will HP. They are only 2.4l Why? because they have a tiny turbo that spools fast.


On a turbo motor its all about the turbo and turbo setup, not the displacement.

Edit: This isn't the 90s we have technology to help with spool rate.

Last edited by adamantium; 07-12-2012 at 02:57 PM.
adamantium is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 04:38 PM
  #194  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
V8EATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Your dumb.
V8EATR is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 04:39 PM
  #195  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V8EATR
Your dumb.
No, you're dumb.
marc97taws6 is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 04:47 PM
  #196  
Teching In
 
LightningTeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis Area
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by adamantium
lol psssh look what you have now though! Honestly love the simplicity of a stock turbo b-series and the power they make, my buddy made low threes through a turd ebay cast log manifold.
Still stock LS head (with cams but still lol).

But cars with powerbands that can turn are more fun. Hence the next car being a Vette or NSX If I can find one at a reasonable price.
LightningTeg is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 04:48 PM
  #197  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

**** Honda's.
ohioborn80 is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 04:49 PM
  #198  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
V8EATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

You're a grammar ****.
V8EATR is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 05:14 PM
  #199  
Staging Lane
 
2SSARME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: I'm a Moderator
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ohioborn80
**** Honda's.
at 10psi hondas would smoke you bro.
2SSARME is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 06:01 PM
  #200  
Registered User
 
ej1overspool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Most powerful hondas right now are 1.8 or 2.0...not smart to make big numbers with bigger pistons or more travel on a 4 banger. More displacement = more torque, becausr you can compress more air. There's a lot that goes into it though. The heads flow plays a huge roll, along with minimizing overlap periods...etc etc.
ej1overspool is offline  


Quick Reply: Me vs Turbo Civic



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 AM.