02 ws6 vs 2013 boss
08-15-2012, 10:40 PM
#101
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
Either way the whole point seems moot imo. I just don't see the relevance of the vid, nor the claims. We're not stooping to lid/catback ls cars pulling on new Boss' s just to get wins here imo. We have enough to brag about without leg humping, and vids like this are a waste of time. That means ****, again imo.
08-15-2012, 10:44 PM
#102
This isn't your car, you have zero proof that its stock. It obviously has DR's and sounds like it has exhaust mods. Makes me wonder what else is actually done....also zero proof of the DA.
BTW I can post youtube videos too and claim there my best buddy... proves nothing...
carry-on
BTW I can post youtube videos too and claim there my best buddy... proves nothing...
carry-on
08-15-2012, 11:11 PM
#103
10 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lol @ this debate.
The car went 115mph in 2000+ DA with tires only.
I've seen Evans car and robs (the track vid) personally run on many occasions.
Put a driver in a boss and it's a 117 car all day in good good air
The car went 115mph in 2000+ DA with tires only.
I've seen Evans car and robs (the track vid) personally run on many occasions.
Put a driver in a boss and it's a 117 car all day in good good air
08-16-2012, 07:23 PM
#107
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Smyrna Beach
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry guys I live in the real-world. Not youtube land. So your awesome soundtrack videos still prove nothing...
Before anyone thinks I blindly hate the 5.0 thats not the case. Its a well engineered motor, but it doesn't defy the laws of physics...while some ford owners seem to think it can.
Before anyone thinks I blindly hate the 5.0 thats not the case. Its a well engineered motor, but it doesn't defy the laws of physics...while some ford owners seem to think it can.
08-16-2012, 09:29 PM
#108
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
Sorry guys I live in the real-world. Not youtube land. So your awesome soundtrack videos still prove nothing...
Before anyone thinks I blindly hate the 5.0 thats not the case. Its a well engineered motor, but it doesn't defy the laws of physics...while some ford owners seem to think it can.
Before anyone thinks I blindly hate the 5.0 thats not the case. Its a well engineered motor, but it doesn't defy the laws of physics...while some ford owners seem to think it can.
"oops you noticed the DR's hey"
08-16-2012, 10:47 PM
#109
10 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry guys I live in the real-world. Not youtube land. So your awesome soundtrack videos still prove nothing...
Before anyone thinks I blindly hate the 5.0 thats not the case. Its a well engineered motor, but it doesn't defy the laws of physics...while some ford owners seem to think it can.
Before anyone thinks I blindly hate the 5.0 thats not the case. Its a well engineered motor, but it doesn't defy the laws of physics...while some ford owners seem to think it can.
You're a ******* clown.
Your buddy managed to keep a <110mph fbody along side you when you were driving a 115+ car.
Learn to drive and STFU.
08-16-2012, 11:40 PM
#110
lmfao at the clowns in here. Somehow me posting a video of a friend of mines stock car ...er uh... race car because it has drag radials.... is irrelavent. Then i post a video of ME racing other cars that have gone down the track (all of which in the 11s at upper teen to low 120 mph, yet again, irrelavant. I hate humanity.....
08-17-2012, 12:01 AM
#111
ever notice how everyone always thinks theyre the best driver... ugh. I think i have been impressed with maybe 3 people EVER on ls1tech.
08-17-2012, 12:23 AM
#113
are you referring to me? My buddies boss is the exact same car u see featured in this thread. He ran it with gt500 wheels on Nitto 555rs on the back. A borrowed curtousy wheel to attempt to get traction. He went 11.9 at 115 in 2000 da with a 1.72 60 ft. Later in the day hit a 1.64 60 ft but missed third gear. His corrected times based off sea level were 11.7 at 117... but either way.. he trapped 115 in bad air. That same air that makes a stock well driven f body trap almost 10mph slower. These 2 cars stock for stock... are no wheres near close. A lid/catback will not close that gap enough to make it close. Anyway who thinks so is just ignorant. Its the same comparison as if i were to say a bone stock boss 302 racing a bone stock c6 z06. They are not in the same league.. simple as that.
08-17-2012, 06:44 AM
#114
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
i guess you're right. i mean, i only have had my CDL for yers and have been driving manuals since i was around 12 years old. but you're right.
you fanbois are hilarious.
08-17-2012, 06:46 AM
#115
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
oh yeas everyone bowdown to evan. he's the only good driver here OMG you're so awesome! i heard you turned down being an astronaut fireman because the space fire truck was an auto ZOMG that's sticking to your guns bro you awesome as ****!
08-17-2012, 06:47 AM
#116
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
are you referring to me? My buddies boss is the exact same car u see featured in this thread. He ran it with gt500 wheels on Nitto 555rs on the back. A borrowed curtousy wheel to attempt to get traction. He went 11.9 at 115 in 2000 da with a 1.72 60 ft. Later in the day hit a 1.64 60 ft but missed third gear. His corrected times based off sea level were 11.7 at 117... but either way.. he trapped 115 in bad air. That same air that makes a stock well driven f body trap almost 10mph slower. These 2 cars stock for stock... are no wheres near close. A lid/catback will not close that gap enough to make it close. Anyway who thinks so is just ignorant. Its the same comparison as if i were to say a bone stock boss 302 racing a bone stock c6 z06. They are not in the same league.. simple as that.
facepalm
08-17-2012, 07:07 AM
#118
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
08-17-2012, 08:57 AM
#119
Launching!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
How 'bout you take your car to the track, get some numbers of your own and then we can see how impressive of a driver you really are.
are you referring to me? My buddies boss is the exact same car u see featured in this thread. He ran it with gt500 wheels on Nitto 555rs on the back. A borrowed curtousy wheel to attempt to get traction. He went 11.9 at 115 in 2000 da with a 1.72 60 ft. Later in the day hit a 1.64 60 ft but missed third gear. His corrected times based off sea level were 11.7 at 117... but either way.. he trapped 115 in bad air. That same air that makes a stock well driven f body trap almost 10mph slower. These 2 cars stock for stock... are no wheres near close. A lid/catback will not close that gap enough to make it close. Anyway who thinks so is just ignorant. Its the same comparison as if i were to say a bone stock boss 302 racing a bone stock c6 z06. They are not in the same league.. simple as that.
08-17-2012, 10:10 AM
#120
are you referring to me? My buddies boss is the exact same car u see featured in this thread. He ran it with gt500 wheels on Nitto 555rs on the back. A borrowed curtousy wheel to attempt to get traction. He went 11.9 at 115 in 2000 da with a 1.72 60 ft. Later in the day hit a 1.64 60 ft but missed third gear. His corrected times based off sea level were 11.7 at 117... but either way.. he trapped 115 in bad air. That same air that makes a stock well driven f body trap almost 10mph slower. These 2 cars stock for stock... are no wheres near close. A lid/catback will not close that gap enough to make it close. Anyway who thinks so is just ignorant. Its the same comparison as if i were to say a bone stock boss 302 racing a bone stock c6 z06. They are not in the same league.. simple as that.
Yes. I was trying to explain to you the reason you are catching a lot of flak,attacks about on your posts,doubt about the validity of your claims was due to your first video which you claimed was a bone stock car where its clearly not. Highly suspect that car was hitting that MPH up north in that kind of air but that's just me and I could be wrong. I agree that a Boss is faster(have seen low 12s 115-116MPH bone stock many many times at Cecil in good air) and with your points for the most part. A lid,exhaust car has no business hanging with a Boss or is capable of it with good driving/car in good shape but again anything can happen on the street. However I disagree with you calling other people names and insulting most people's driving ability from this section. That's pretty immature and no need to attack everyone.