what's the excuse going to be now GM?
#61
For both of........one's a 4 seat car and the other is a 2 seat car. Nuff said
So no comment on furds latest greatest competing with 10 year gm stuff??....lol
I personally think there is a huge difference in stuff being designed from the ground up for a specific purpose rather that adapting old stuff to work. The camaro has been a adaption of a sedan chassis since day one. Gm done a fine job of making it work but it's got it's limits.
So no comment on furds latest greatest competing with 10 year gm stuff??....lol
I personally think there is a huge difference in stuff being designed from the ground up for a specific purpose rather that adapting old stuff to work. The camaro has been a adaption of a sedan chassis since day one. Gm done a fine job of making it work but it's got it's limits.
#64
#67
#68
Everyone knew, as soon as this thread was made YOU would be the one thinking up new excuses.
When the Mustang was faster than the Camaro, the excuse was "well its made for cornering now guys!!!", then the z28 was made, and was **** in a straight line, but thats ok because it was a "track monster", now the GT350 beats it around a track and you have to think of a whole new excuse, "DUDE THEY ARENT EVEN COMPETITORS FOR THE Z28, ITS GOT 2 SEATS GUYS!!"
You're a ******* joke.
#70
Did you think of that all on your own, midget?
Everyone knew, as soon as this thread was made YOU would be the one thinking up new excuses.
When the Mustang was faster than the Camaro, the excuse was "well its made for cornering now guys!!!", then the z28 was made, and was **** in a straight line, but thats ok because it was a "track monster", now the GT350 beats it around a track and you have to think of a whole new excuse, "DUDE THEY ARENT EVEN COMPETITORS FOR THE Z28, ITS GOT 2 SEATS GUYS!!"
You're a ******* joke.
Everyone knew, as soon as this thread was made YOU would be the one thinking up new excuses.
When the Mustang was faster than the Camaro, the excuse was "well its made for cornering now guys!!!", then the z28 was made, and was **** in a straight line, but thats ok because it was a "track monster", now the GT350 beats it around a track and you have to think of a whole new excuse, "DUDE THEY ARENT EVEN COMPETITORS FOR THE Z28, ITS GOT 2 SEATS GUYS!!"
You're a ******* joke.
#71
#74
Quit trying to make the vette and mustang direct competitors.
PS. I know you have little choice after the fif gen doe. lol
You been trolled bro!
60% of the time the interwebz are right 100% of the time.
#75
The R is a 2 seater sports car
#76
Did you think of that all on your own, midget?
Everyone knew, as soon as this thread was made YOU would be the one thinking up new excuses.
When the Mustang was faster than the Camaro, the excuse was "well its made for cornering now guys!!!", then the z28 was made, and was **** in a straight line, but thats ok because it was a "track monster", now the GT350 beats it around a track and you have to think of a whole new excuse, "DUDE THEY ARENT EVEN COMPETITORS FOR THE Z28, ITS GOT 2 SEATS GUYS!!"
You're a ******* joke.
Everyone knew, as soon as this thread was made YOU would be the one thinking up new excuses.
When the Mustang was faster than the Camaro, the excuse was "well its made for cornering now guys!!!", then the z28 was made, and was **** in a straight line, but thats ok because it was a "track monster", now the GT350 beats it around a track and you have to think of a whole new excuse, "DUDE THEY ARENT EVEN COMPETITORS FOR THE Z28, ITS GOT 2 SEATS GUYS!!"
You're a ******* joke.
Troof!
#77
Man I know you two are not that ******* stupid? It's a MUSTANG witch means pony car not sports car lmao. If that's all you two got is because of no back seats pretty sad even for you far left GM guys.
#78
#79
Let's see....it has 2 seats....irs.....carbon wheels and brakes....development at the ring.....track ready.....very expensive. Sure sounds like a sports car to me.
Pony cars were meant to be affordable and usable performance cars.
Pony cars were meant to be affordable and usable performance cars.
#80