16SS vs gt500
there really is no clear line
Someone's butt is a little sore
Sra is great for strength and durability. When it comes to planting both tires it kinda lacks. Have you ever wondered why the "loaded" tire spins harder on a sra car?
From what i gather 240's have a stout irs too. Technology has changed......it seems as some of these neanderthal's can only accept that when there is a horsepower number in front of it.
So faster than most everyone here......really most everyone
That helps all cars.
Nah......I've seen pulley/tuned/exhausted drag pak cars dip in the 11s at my track. But my track is kinda slow.
I like my SRA's for strength, but I do understand what you are getting at, if you have any body roll to one side which usually happens in drag racing. You keep the tires planted squarely on the ground, I guess a sra can through weight transfer apply more pressure to a corner causing 1 tire to squat more and cause uneven pressure across a wide tire on the other side. IIRC that's how I read it a while back in article. It sounded legitimate but who knows. You also have more adjustability but that would be needed with all the flex going on. Maby in the future it will be more common to use it instead of going sra?
Edit the article I was reading was talking about street or bracket cars not pro stocks or funny cars etc. If I can find it I'll post up a link
Edit the article I was reading was talking about street or bracket cars not pro stocks or funny cars etc. If I can find it I'll post up a link
Coming from a mostly JDM country, we have not really had LRA cars for 20-30 years here. Only farm utes etc. Even the Holdens moved to IRS yonks ago.
And we have plenty of near stock suspension IRS cars in the 10s and 9s... I'm shooting for high 10s in my LS3 S2000 when it's done. They're IRS and have run in the 8s. Mine has enough power, it's just skill, tyre, setup and surface are main limitations.
And anti squat and all that jazz is easily done on IRS with active/magnetic suspension.
And that suspension is not really any heavier than normal stuff for a larger car, I have one of the first models from an 09' HSV...
And we have plenty of near stock suspension IRS cars in the 10s and 9s... I'm shooting for high 10s in my LS3 S2000 when it's done. They're IRS and have run in the 8s. Mine has enough power, it's just skill, tyre, setup and surface are main limitations.
And anti squat and all that jazz is easily done on IRS with active/magnetic suspension.
And that suspension is not really any heavier than normal stuff for a larger car, I have one of the first models from an 09' HSV...
Nah......I've seen pulley/tuned/exhausted drag pak cars dip in the 11s at my track. But my track is kinda slow.
Your comment is just more proof the 5G needs mods to keep up.
The s550 and the 5G are definitely a driver's race stock for stock, edge to the s550.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 4
From: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey

Btw.....8sec is no limitation to irs it just seems they get there fairly easily . They have been 6's.
I had a friend turn his sra 8.8 swapped cobra into a U almost trying to go high 9s.
Like i said there is no clear line. And even if/when there was that line is changing just as technology does. Just the way it is.
Last edited by HioSSilver; Feb 18, 2016 at 07:33 AM.
I wasn't aware that is only a tenth apart from the 12.22@115.18 on svtp.
Looks more like .368-.548 quicker and 4.88-6.2 faster, but double check my math

The next two on the stock s197 coyote list are both quicker and faster as well than the quickest 5G. I didn't go further past that. We all get the point

You must be talking about the s550, Ford's L99
Last edited by marc97taws6; Feb 18, 2016 at 08:32 AM.
there really is no clear line
Someone's butt is a little sore
Sra is great for strength and durability. When it comes to planting both tires it kinda lacks. Have you ever wondered why the "loaded" tire spins harder on a sra car?
From what i gather 240's have a stout irs too. Technology has changed......it seems as some of these neanderthal's can only accept that when there is a horsepower number in front of it.
So faster than most everyone here......really most everyone
That helps all cars.
Nah......I've seen pulley/tuned/exhausted drag pak cars dip in the 11s at my track. But my track is kinda slow.
Someone's butt is a little sore
Sra is great for strength and durability. When it comes to planting both tires it kinda lacks. Have you ever wondered why the "loaded" tire spins harder on a sra car?
From what i gather 240's have a stout irs too. Technology has changed......it seems as some of these neanderthal's can only accept that when there is a horsepower number in front of it.
So faster than most everyone here......really most everyone
That helps all cars.
Nah......I've seen pulley/tuned/exhausted drag pak cars dip in the 11s at my track. But my track is kinda slow.
I guess you think the wheel stays in place just using the cv's.....lol....ok
When you get down to the power is dispersed with more pickup points through irs than sra. Especially with these newer multi-link irs set ups with up to 5 points per side.
last I looked it was 12.4 for the 5br0 and 12.5 for the 5gen. Funny how most 5br0's struggle to get within a second of their record stock time while I have seen 2 5gens run in about .4 of it's record stock time.
Of course all that has changed now and the 6gen flat kicks both their asses. But you keep hanging on to the 5gen brah.
Because rotational forces unload that tire via the straight axle. That's why the rt tire spins harder......unless you're having some other type of diff issue or one tire being on dirt vs the other on asphalt. Just to put that out there before someone starts some dumb ****.
Those forces are none existent in irs because the differential is mounted independently of the wheel/tire. So they only have to deal with forward motion forces then.
Your IQ is in the negatives.
When you get down to the power is dispersed with more pickup points through irs than sra. Especially with these newer multi-link irs set ups with up to 5 points per side.
According to Camaro5 list, quickest stock ls3 was 12.588@110.3 and quickest stock l99 was 12.768@108.98
I wasn't aware that is only a tenth apart from the 12.22@115.18 on svtp.
Looks more like .368-.548 quicker and 4.88-6.2 faster, but double check my math
The next two on the stock s197 coyote list are both quicker and faster as well than the quickest 5G. I didn't go further past that. We all get the point
You must be talking about the s550, Ford's L99
I wasn't aware that is only a tenth apart from the 12.22@115.18 on svtp.
Looks more like .368-.548 quicker and 4.88-6.2 faster, but double check my math

The next two on the stock s197 coyote list are both quicker and faster as well than the quickest 5G. I didn't go further past that. We all get the point

You must be talking about the s550, Ford's L99
Of course all that has changed now and the 6gen flat kicks both their asses. But you keep hanging on to the 5gen brah.
Because rotational forces unload that tire via the straight axle. That's why the rt tire spins harder......unless you're having some other type of diff issue or one tire being on dirt vs the other on asphalt. Just to put that out there before someone starts some dumb ****.
Those forces are none existent in irs because the differential is mounted independently of the wheel/tire. So they only have to deal with forward motion forces then.
Your IQ is in the negatives.
last I looked it was 12.4 for the 5br0 and 12.5 for the 5gen. Funny how most 5br0's struggle to get within a second of their record stock time while I have seen 2 5gens run in about .4 of it's record stock time.
Of course all that has changed now and the 6gen flat kicks both their asses. But you keep hanging on to the 5gen brah.
Of course all that has changed now and the 6gen flat kicks both their asses. But you keep hanging on to the 5gen brah.
5G SS only managed to best Mustang GT stock for stock times 1 out of 6 model years. That's pretty good, right?
Agreed, new 6G straight flies.
Same old Doug
They have at our track too.... But what kind of power is that gt500 making again? 
All joking aside, that is pretty bad performance for what I've seen some of the run. Some due to bad drivers, some drive the hell out of it. Seems like one out of every 5 run decent and I was quite disappointed the first time I lined up against one, I was hoping for a good run

All joking aside, that is pretty bad performance for what I've seen some of the run. Some due to bad drivers, some drive the hell out of it. Seems like one out of every 5 run decent and I was quite disappointed the first time I lined up against one, I was hoping for a good run

Because rotational forces unload that tire via the straight axle. That's why the rt tire spins harder......unless you're having some other type of diff issue or one tire being on dirt vs the other on asphalt. Just to put that out there before someone starts some dumb ****.
Those forces are none existent in irs because the differential is mounted independently of the wheel/tire. So they only have to deal with forward motion forces then.
Edit: Also, when you say the tire spins "harder", do mean it spins faster, or overcomes more force to spin at the same rate as the other?
Last edited by zz4camaro1980; Feb 18, 2016 at 04:41 PM.
My point is, and you should be able to back me on it then if you go as much as me. That the gt500's are letdowns for the most part. You get one out of it seems like every 5 that run well. Which I stand by my statement that for what the cars are, the m6 fbody's perform better than the gt500. I clearly stated that they don't have better et or trap, but for what they are, the ls1 on Ave performs better, period!
Edit: talking bone stock.
I also said that the new coyote on Ave performs better than their top of the line production gt500 and I stand by that statement too. All we have to do is actually sit and film a couple wide open Wednesdays and midnight Madness's to prove it Lol.
Last edited by Deeohgie69; Feb 18, 2016 at 04:52 PM.
And I said that the bolt on ls1 range from high 12's to high 13's. That's fact right? There are also alot of 11 sec ones there too, as I already stated.
My point is, and you should be able to back me on it then if you go as much as me. That the gt500's are letdowns for the most part. You get one out of it seems like every 5 that run well. Which I stand by my statement that for what the cars are, the m6 fbody's perform better than the gt500. I clearly stated that they don't have better et or trap, but for what they are, the ls1 on Ave performs better, period!
Edit: talking bone stock.
I also said that the new coyote on Ave performs better than their top of the line production gt500 and I stand by that statement too. All we have to do is actually sit and film a couple wide open Wednesdays and midnight Madness's to prove it Lol.
My point is, and you should be able to back me on it then if you go as much as me. That the gt500's are letdowns for the most part. You get one out of it seems like every 5 that run well. Which I stand by my statement that for what the cars are, the m6 fbody's perform better than the gt500. I clearly stated that they don't have better et or trap, but for what they are, the ls1 on Ave performs better, period!
Edit: talking bone stock.
I also said that the new coyote on Ave performs better than their top of the line production gt500 and I stand by that statement too. All we have to do is actually sit and film a couple wide open Wednesdays and midnight Madness's to prove it Lol.
Actually have a few good running ctsv's and g8's though. Starting to get some decent running bro's now, so it should be a pretty good season.











