Tuned, bolt on 5.bro vs Stock 6th Gen Manual
#121
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wrong.. the ONE 6gen that ran 11s in very low + DA was not stock. Poor fanbois.... They love clinging to that "stock" advantage... yep.. 6gen quicker stock.. not modded.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
![Mr. Cool](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cool.gif)
#122
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Go get you one and quit nuthugging, and run me then. Cheerleader....
Wrong.. the ONE 6gen that ran 11s in very low + DA was not stock. Poor fanbois.... They love clinging to that "stock" advantage... yep.. 6gen quicker stock.. not modded.
Poor Hio Cheerleading Squad... they sit back and cheer for cars they don't even own or drive, to someone who owns and races one of them... poor guys. Get off your couches and get with the modern times... buy a new car and quit wasting time on old rattleboxes... ![Mr. Cool](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cool.gif)
Wrong.. the ONE 6gen that ran 11s in very low + DA was not stock. Poor fanbois.... They love clinging to that "stock" advantage... yep.. 6gen quicker stock.. not modded.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
![Mr. Cool](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cool.gif)
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#124
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Go get you one and quit nuthugging, and run me then. Cheerleader....
Wrong.. the ONE 6gen that ran 11s in very low + DA was not stock. Poor fanbois.... They love clinging to that "stock" advantage... yep.. 6gen quicker stock.. not modded.
Poor Hio Cheerleading Squad... they sit back and cheer for cars they don't even own or drive, to someone who owns and races one of them... poor guys. Get off your couches and get with the modern times... buy a new car and quit wasting time on old rattleboxes... ![Mr. Cool](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cool.gif)
Wrong.. the ONE 6gen that ran 11s in very low + DA was not stock. Poor fanbois.... They love clinging to that "stock" advantage... yep.. 6gen quicker stock.. not modded.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
![Mr. Cool](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cool.gif)
E85 coyote gains 10-15 hp correct?
LT1 gains ~35hp correct?
What makes you think if a 6gen had your mods that it would be closer than stock v stock? It would in fact be worse.
Please explain...
Also where is your proof that car wasn't stock? And what about the one hammer just posted stock with a 119 trap? that's a different car as well.
11.9 isn't a hero run for these cars when we have 4 of them now...its not the norm but will happen with good conditions and DA.
The hero run will be 11.7 or so...
#125
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok....I really cant grasp your logic.
E85 coyote gains 10-15 hp correct?
LT1 gains ~35hp correct?
What makes you think if a 6gen had your mods that it would be closer than stock v stock? It would in fact be worse.
Please explain...
Because I can only use my car as an example, and with a simple catback it ran similar/slightly slower than the stock AVERAGE A8 cars are running. My catback is 100% comparable to the SS NPP exhaust.. ie.. almost no gains.
I fully agree that they are a slightly quicker car stock. You put similar mods on those car that I have and they will run similar times. So... the gap disappeared.
Also where is your proof that car wasn't stock? And what about the one hammer just posted stock with a 119 trap? that's a different car as well.
Because they are NOT a 119mph car stock. You mean to tell me running 4mph faster than the AVERAGE trapping 6gen makes sense?
11.9 isn't a hero run for these cars when we have 4 of them now...its not the norm but will happen with good conditions and DA.
The hero run will be 11.7 or so...
E85 coyote gains 10-15 hp correct?
LT1 gains ~35hp correct?
What makes you think if a 6gen had your mods that it would be closer than stock v stock? It would in fact be worse.
Please explain...
Because I can only use my car as an example, and with a simple catback it ran similar/slightly slower than the stock AVERAGE A8 cars are running. My catback is 100% comparable to the SS NPP exhaust.. ie.. almost no gains.
I fully agree that they are a slightly quicker car stock. You put similar mods on those car that I have and they will run similar times. So... the gap disappeared.
Also where is your proof that car wasn't stock? And what about the one hammer just posted stock with a 119 trap? that's a different car as well.
Because they are NOT a 119mph car stock. You mean to tell me running 4mph faster than the AVERAGE trapping 6gen makes sense?
11.9 isn't a hero run for these cars when we have 4 of them now...its not the norm but will happen with good conditions and DA.
The hero run will be 11.7 or so...
#127
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The LT1 gains 35rwhp from the STOCK tune on 91octane to an E85 tune. My car make an ADDITIONAL 10-15rwhp over my 93octane tune on E85. Similar gains.
#130
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I CAN say this... My car from stock tune vs 93octane flex tune made a huge difference. When running E85 I don't notice a huge difference, but feel like 10-15rwhp more is a safe bet. It sure as hell does not gain Zero hp over 93.
#131
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Seems to be coming more so from Ultra.. My car on E85/tires/catback runs high 11s. In the same DA I run high 11s, I see stock 6gens running mid-low 12s, and with tune/tire/catback(or NPP exhaust) running similar times.
The 11.9s and 11.7 on tire times were all in MIRish hero negative DA.
We have also seen A8 SS Camaros run 12.5-12.8 in 1500ft DA.
The 11.9s and 11.7 on tire times were all in MIRish hero negative DA.
We have also seen A8 SS Camaros run 12.5-12.8 in 1500ft DA.
#132
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have not had my car on the dyno, so cannot speak to my personal gains. But i have seen dynosheet of 20ish rwhp gains simply using E85 with the same Flex tune vs. 93octane. Unsure that is average.. but I believe 15rwhp is a safe bet. That is the beauty of my flex tune. I drive around on my 93octane... run it down to about 10miles to empty or less, then put the E85 in and give the car 10-15mins or so to relearn. I have a reading on my gauge that changes from 0 to 1 when the tune has learned and locked the timing tables in.
I CAN say this... My car from stock tune vs 93octane flex tune made a huge difference. When running E85 I don't notice a huge difference, but feel like 10-15rwhp more is a safe bet. It sure as hell does not gain Zero hp over 93.
I CAN say this... My car from stock tune vs 93octane flex tune made a huge difference. When running E85 I don't notice a huge difference, but feel like 10-15rwhp more is a safe bet. It sure as hell does not gain Zero hp over 93.
Sounds completely and utterly impossible.
But hey maybe im crazy.
Either way you have a car and you run it. Cant say too much. Im just arm chairing it right now. If I had a 6 gen I would probably been tempted to meet you halfway from Michigan already.
Continued luck to you and your 5.slow
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
#133
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Still not seeing how even if they gain similar the stock gap vanishes.
Sounds completely and utterly impossible.
But hey maybe im crazy.
Either way you have a car and you run it. Cant say too much. Im just arm chairing it right now. If I had a 6 gen I would probably been tempted to meet you halfway from Michigan already.
Continued luck to you and your 5.slow![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
Sounds completely and utterly impossible.
But hey maybe im crazy.
Either way you have a car and you run it. Cant say too much. Im just arm chairing it right now. If I had a 6 gen I would probably been tempted to meet you halfway from Michigan already.
Continued luck to you and your 5.slow
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
![Cheers!!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cheers.gif)
#139
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#140
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Go get you one and quit nuthugging, and run me then. Cheerleader....
Wrong.. the ONE 6gen that ran 11s in very low + DA was not stock. Poor fanbois.... They love clinging to that "stock" advantage... yep.. 6gen quicker stock.. not modded.
Poor Hio Cheerleading Squad... they sit back and cheer for cars they don't even own or drive, to someone who owns and races one of them... poor guys. Get off your couches and get with the modern times... buy a new car and quit wasting time on old rattleboxes... ![Mr. Cool](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cool.gif)
Wrong.. the ONE 6gen that ran 11s in very low + DA was not stock. Poor fanbois.... They love clinging to that "stock" advantage... yep.. 6gen quicker stock.. not modded.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
![Mr. Cool](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cool.gif)
And yea....my camaro has held up well for a 17yr old car with. 120+k on it.
They have run your best times in da similar to yours bone stock. Lt1's are just more powerful