2v mustang gt vs ls1
#181
10 Second Club
#182
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've seen plenty of cam only cars do it, couple of highly modified and weight reduction bolt on cars get close, but nothing that close to stock.
I look at this forum and I realized something. Hio is a joke to his own people. You're right behind him, but at least you contribute a little bit.
#184
10 Second Club
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Please educate me, oh king of the bolt on's. In fact, this is an open challenge to anyone on here. Find me an LS1 Fbod that's as lightly modded as Hio claims that gets anywhere near 11's@116.
I've seen plenty of cam only cars do it, couple of highly modified and weight reduction bolt on cars get close, but nothing that close to stock.
I look at this forum and I realized something. Hio is a joke to his own people. You're right behind him, but at least you contribute a little bit.
I've seen plenty of cam only cars do it, couple of highly modified and weight reduction bolt on cars get close, but nothing that close to stock.
I look at this forum and I realized something. Hio is a joke to his own people. You're right behind him, but at least you contribute a little bit.
There's also another guy on here somewhere running like 11.6 with minimal mods through an auto. Just because you don't know how to do it doesn't mean it can't be done
#185
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's not a question of knowledge. Doug makes it so simple that is should be easy to duplicate, or at least get close. Ported LS6 intake + Grantelli MAF + UDP's + catback + 3.73's + 200lbs of "incidental weight reduction" = 11.96@116.
#187
10 Second Club
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
He claims to have done it, there is a difference. Find me this guy that's running 11.6. I sure haven't seen him.
It's not a question of knowledge. Doug makes it so simple that is should be easy to duplicate, or at least get close. Ported LS6 intake + Grantelli MAF + UDP's + catback + 3.73's + 200lbs of "incidental weight reduction" = 11.96@116.
It's not a question of knowledge. Doug makes it so simple that is should be easy to duplicate, or at least get close. Ported LS6 intake + Grantelli MAF + UDP's + catback + 3.73's + 200lbs of "incidental weight reduction" = 11.96@116.
#188
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If it's not impossible, show me.
#189
TECH Junkie
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I concur, just trying to stir the pot. It's actually my buddy's car and he was stuck at 12.02 for about 5 straight passes and he weighs about 60 lbs. more than me so we switched drivers and got his 11 second slip. Nice loose converter and pulled a 1.63 60'
#190
10 Second Club
#191
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The simple fact that you mention screenshotting stuff, when I have already said what my mods are on ls1tech shows you seriously need a life and are TRULY worried about the 5.0s. Because why else would you pay so much attention to the little details? I already told you... these springs have helped zilch. performance version of these springs would net the same. I have hidden nothing, and frankly don't give a **** that you think otherwise. Your jealously is showing. Worry about making your car faster instead of everyone elses.
You are just worried that full weight simple bolt on 5.0s can run what your gutted out tin can has run with a motor swap, and who knows what else "HIDDEN" mods. Man you are a hypocrite to try to call someone out for hidden mods. "Wahhh..... you have drag springs instead of normal lowering springs!!!! Wahhhhhh!!!!"
We can always jump back on your fake assed scale numbers... but you know what? I don't care man! That's why I don't hound you about your mods and screenshot(I LOLd sooo damn hard at this!!! Pitiful! ) Trust me Duggy... I have no secrets on my car...
You are just worried that full weight simple bolt on 5.0s can run what your gutted out tin can has run with a motor swap, and who knows what else "HIDDEN" mods. Man you are a hypocrite to try to call someone out for hidden mods. "Wahhh..... you have drag springs instead of normal lowering springs!!!! Wahhhhhh!!!!"
We can always jump back on your fake assed scale numbers... but you know what? I don't care man! That's why I don't hound you about your mods and screenshot(I LOLd sooo damn hard at this!!! Pitiful! ) Trust me Duggy... I have no secrets on my car...
My scale #s are 100% accurate. You mad ain't no pump 5br0 running near my trap?
Please educate me, oh king of the bolt on's. In fact, this is an open challenge to anyone on here. Find me an LS1 Fbod that's as lightly modded as Hio claims that gets anywhere near 11's@116.
I've seen plenty of cam only cars do it, couple of highly modified and weight reduction bolt on cars get close, but nothing that close to stock.
I look at this forum and I realized something. Hio is a joke to his own people. You're right behind him, but at least you contribute a little bit.
I've seen plenty of cam only cars do it, couple of highly modified and weight reduction bolt on cars get close, but nothing that close to stock.
I look at this forum and I realized something. Hio is a joke to his own people. You're right behind him, but at least you contribute a little bit.
He claims to have done it, there is a difference. Find me this guy that's running 11.6. I sure haven't seen him.
It's not a question of knowledge. Doug makes it so simple that is should be easy to duplicate, or at least get close. Ported LS6 intake + Grantelli MAF + UDP's + catback + 3.73's + 200lbs of "incidental weight reduction" = 11.96@116.
It's not a question of knowledge. Doug makes it so simple that is should be easy to duplicate, or at least get close. Ported LS6 intake + Grantelli MAF + UDP's + catback + 3.73's + 200lbs of "incidental weight reduction" = 11.96@116.
It's easy....you have the list there. Go do it. We both know you suck to much to have a clue how to.
#194
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No he didn't.
Again with the deflections, are you admitting that you can't find another example?
How do i look like a joke? Some like you just don't ****** listen. You think you know more than you.
How the **** does it it proved more than a mod list and vid of the run? He's one of those idiots that think a fbo ls1 should run low 13s -high 12s.
You forgot the spec clutch.
It's easy....you have the list there. Go do it. We both know you suck to much to have a clue how to.
How the **** does it it proved more than a mod list and vid of the run? He's one of those idiots that think a fbo ls1 should run low 13s -high 12s.
You forgot the spec clutch.
It's easy....you have the list there. Go do it. We both know you suck to much to have a clue how to.
#198
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And the proof is in hammer taking it even further since they were beung modded similar. His car would easily out et and out trap that nathans. The evolution of nathans car ended because he parted it. After he installed the headers and tube k the car woulda likely ran around a 11.6 at 118+
Eat that **** muh bitch
Next he'll be telling you that your car didn't run what you said soule because he can't figure out how it's done.
Seems like all you **** are ones throwing around excuses
#200
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Get me access to the car and I will prove it.
Hammer's car is irrelevant in this argument until he releases a mod list. Can't compare to a modded car if we don't know his mods.
I am asking a direct question, and if you don't give me a direct answer, then you're completely full of ****.
Can you find a video of a similarly modded car running near 11.96@116?
No more deflections, no more lame *** character attacks. If you can, post the video
Since I know you can't, I am expecting the same old song and dance that you always do when you have been thoroughly decimated in an argument.
Oh i did
And the proof is in hammer taking it even further since they were beung modded similar. His car would easily out et and out trap that nathans. The evolution of nathans car ended because he parted it. After he installed the headers and tube k the car woulda likely ran around a 11.6 at 118+
Eat that **** muh bitch
Next he'll be telling you that your car didn't run what you said soule because he can't figure out how it's done.
Don't be mad brah. Your built one will be lucky to keep up with my bolt on ls6
Seems like all you **** are ones throwing around excuses
And the proof is in hammer taking it even further since they were beung modded similar. His car would easily out et and out trap that nathans. The evolution of nathans car ended because he parted it. After he installed the headers and tube k the car woulda likely ran around a 11.6 at 118+
Eat that **** muh bitch
Next he'll be telling you that your car didn't run what you said soule because he can't figure out how it's done.
Don't be mad brah. Your built one will be lucky to keep up with my bolt on ls6
Seems like all you **** are ones throwing around excuses
I am asking a direct question, and if you don't give me a direct answer, then you're completely full of ****.
Can you find a video of a similarly modded car running near 11.96@116?
No more deflections, no more lame *** character attacks. If you can, post the video
Since I know you can't, I am expecting the same old song and dance that you always do when you have been thoroughly decimated in an argument.