Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Stock Boss 302 vs LBO 6gen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2016, 06:07 PM
  #221  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
Typical FBO br0 is in the 400-430 RWHP range
Nah, they make more than that. I did a measly 402 with just the catback, tune, e85. Still stalk aibocks, exhaust manifolds, intake manifold and cats. Thats through auto too so manual car would be 420ish. Fbo would throw another 40-50rwhp with gt350im
Old 09-12-2016, 06:08 PM
  #222  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
MSD and headers and a better converter and he will be around 10's at full weight. That's badass
But a bro does it and its not badass. Lol
Old 09-12-2016, 06:09 PM
  #223  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ZNix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plympton, MA
Posts: 193
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

He's already half a second and 4mph faster hauling around 250lbs more. Shouldn't be hard to double that.
Old 09-12-2016, 06:14 PM
  #224  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
It's not rated as as much power is it? foes it rev as high in oe form?? I think not

Fact is comparing a full sausage motor like that to a engine that ended up in a sedan is kinda crazy.

Nice deflection......so no stock 11 sec 5br0s eehh?

Who has a gutted 4gen?


Cc went 7.1......I'm the second one here to mention ut. Why do you insist on dumbing down his times?
They can rev just as high without a problem. Makes no sense with stock Intake. Although it flows better than the boss intake low and mid range, the boss carries more power above 700prpm. The GT350 IM more than fixes that issue though. Power handling wise, they handle the same power. New 5.0 can handle 900rwhp SLB without breaking a sweat. Its hp plus rpm that seems to get the opgs... and I would change those as a precaution anyway.

Wait till Nanner gets a set of twins. It will move out for sure.
Old 09-12-2016, 06:22 PM
  #225  
Teching In
 
corysmach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZNix
He's already half a second and 4mph faster hauling around 250lbs more. Shouldn't be hard to double that.
Me and him talk. He has spent some money.....but the car should roll out. I brag about him because he is super humble and is willing to help people out and tells the truth. Thats the opposite here. When we talk he only wants to help me and not even talk about his car.
Old 09-12-2016, 06:26 PM
  #226  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZNix
He's already half a second and 4mph faster hauling around 250lbs more. Shouldn't be hard to double that.
He gained 4 mph over e85 after switching to ftw. No big deal I know.

He didn't even trap as high as hio on 93 when it was on e85.

Those are just the facts. Not taking a side.

and were still comparing this to a 15 year old motor.
Old 09-12-2016, 06:29 PM
  #227  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 153 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Poppacapp
But a bro does it and its not badass. Lol
Apples for apples the 6 gen wil be 7+ Tenths faster
Old 09-12-2016, 06:30 PM
  #228  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
He gained 4 mph over e85 after switching to ftw. No big deal I know.

He didn't even trap as high as hio on 93 when it was on e85.

Those are just the facts. Not taking a side.

and were still comparing this to a 15 year old motor.
What's your point?
Old 09-12-2016, 06:30 PM
  #229  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by corysmach1
Me and him talk. He has spent some money.....but the car should roll out. I brag about him because he is super humble and is willing to help people out and tells the truth. Thats the opposite here. When we talk he only wants to help me and not even talk about his car.
So unlike a certain someone on here you don't have to slob his **** for help?
Old 09-12-2016, 06:34 PM
  #230  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Poppacapp
But a bro does it and its not badass. Lol
Got a link to an s550 auto full weight besides dp running 10s? on e85 or regular pump bolt on stock transmission? Will need proof of the raceweight as well.

really curious to see the build.
Old 09-12-2016, 06:35 PM
  #231  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
He gained 4 mph over e85 after switching to ftw. No big deal I know.

He didn't even trap as high as hio on 93 when it was on e85.

Those are just the facts. Not taking a side.

and were still comparing this to a 15 year old motor.
Ultra interviewing for Hiocrew I see lol
Old 09-12-2016, 06:35 PM
  #232  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
Apples for apples the 6 gen wil be 7+ Tenths faster
Lol! Not even close
Old 09-12-2016, 06:38 PM
  #233  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Poppacapp
Ultra interviewing for Hiocrew I see lol
Because I stated a fact?

gotcha
Old 09-12-2016, 06:40 PM
  #234  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by islander033
What's your point?
That this car is impressive...in large part...because of the $35 gallon fuel. Which is a fact.
Old 09-12-2016, 06:42 PM
  #235  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 153 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by corysmach1
Of course you think he is lying....is that because you lie? I know the changes he has made and I am not sure where your gonna pick up close to a second and 8-10mph to beat him.
Bolt on ls6 10.0 135. 9.5 @ 140 cam only
Old 09-12-2016, 06:42 PM
  #236  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 153 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Poppacapp
Lol! Not even close
Some mags have it closer to a second
Old 09-12-2016, 06:45 PM
  #237  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ZNix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plympton, MA
Posts: 193
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
He gained 4 mph over e85 after switching to ftw. No big deal I know.

He didn't even trap as high as hio on 93 when it was on e85.

Those are just the facts. Not taking a side.

and were still comparing this to a 15 year old motor.
At a much heavier weight.
Old 09-12-2016, 06:47 PM
  #238  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
That this car is impressive...in large part...because of the $35 gallon fuel. Which is a fact.
So..... you think he gained 4mph just by switching from E85 to FTW?
Old 09-12-2016, 07:12 PM
  #239  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by islander033
So..... you think he gained 4mph just by switching from E85 to FTW?
No...I know it for a fact. Its in the link. DA was about the same. He never trapped over 130 with e85. was 125-129. First time out on ftw he hit 134. The only change was ftw and retune.

It also dyno over 500 rwhp. In the link as well.

sry...not in the link...on the website if you search his name.

Last edited by UltraZLS1; 09-12-2016 at 07:27 PM.
Old 09-12-2016, 07:14 PM
  #240  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZNix
At a much heavier weight.
It had a 3400 raceweight.

What was hios raceweight?

Id consider much heavier like 300+lbs.

funny we are still splitting hairs against a 15 year old motor on pump.


Quick Reply: Stock Boss 302 vs LBO 6gen



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 PM.