lucille vs pray tune 6th gen
#81
no one on our side is upset we're just shooting the ****. I simply found it funny that people came in quick with the victory banner and a screen shot showing Drew a few cars ahead. But no one mentioned another 5.0 beat the 6gen until I mentioned it.
#82
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
IDK man. That seems to be the biggest gripe. If it takes you till 140 to 150 to come around a car then the other car is probably just quicker. Go mod your car some more and come back for the next round.
Both awesome cars and awesome dudes. The races laid out as they did. Not much else to say about that.
Both awesome cars and awesome dudes. The races laid out as they did. Not much else to say about that.
#83
I didn't know about the other race and when I saw it you can clearly see what happened. Claim that victory if you want.
#85
So is Lucille the fastest N/A or FBO 5.0 down there or not? Everone has been telling me it is. All the vids posted show it is. Leo out ran the other guy from what I heard.
#86
As of now, yes, no 5.0 has beat him. Theres a 2015 that was pretty quick but shop messed up big time on his cam install and porting shop messed up his CJ manifold so he's been down for at least 2 months
#87
Dang, that sucks for that dude. Sorry to hear that. I thought ya'lls cams were fully adjustable and didn't need a bump up?
#93
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: miami fl
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think everyone is missing something. As far as I know the end mph for each run was agreed upon. Drew let out at the agreed mph for each run. It wasn't like every run was to 150. Some were 30-130, 40-140, 50-150. There were obviously more but you get the point. If the runs had been 20-150 or 30-150 then Leo would have had more ground to make up and the results would have been the same in my opinion. Look at Leo's speedo on the bottom of the vids. For the most part, every time Drew checks up Leo isn't at the end mph yet. I don't know how else to say it. I am just going off the data presented.
What you are forgetting about is traction at the track. Given even traction, like a roll race from an agreed upon start mph, traction is out of the equation. So at the track, one car runs 11.0@120 and the other runs 11.0@150 the 150 car simply didn't have the same 60ft. Given the same 60ft it wouldn't run 11.0's.
What you are forgetting about is traction at the track. Given even traction, like a roll race from an agreed upon start mph, traction is out of the equation. So at the track, one car runs 11.0@120 and the other runs 11.0@150 the 150 car simply didn't have the same 60ft. Given the same 60ft it wouldn't run 11.0's.
Last edited by swapped3vgt; 09-10-2018 at 06:15 PM.