islander033

What's the total number produced to date?

Chris25

iTrader: (1)

Three fiddy

islander033

I bet that’s pretty accurate +/- 100%

snake95

LMFAO!!!! Does it bug you the LS series used a ton of design cues from the Windsor and Cleveland? Need a hug?

OneSlowV

iTrader: (2)

One side is finally on just need to finish arms on driver side . 28s look a lot better than 26s for sure lol . Whole new setup saved me 98.9lbs I’m happy

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

7 now. Sent 3 out this week.
There is nothing windsor like about the ls. You wanna know how we know this......because it's not a gutless pos like windsors were.

Furd new bb ls/t is nearly a direct copy. Furd guys should rejoice tho.....they finally get a ls right from the factory.

yea that looks better.

snake95

GM copied as best they could from Ford. We saw what happens when they try their own ****. Exhibit A) Northstar

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

The sbc thrashed the **** outta the sbf. Why would gm copy that pos?

snake95

Nope! After the 350 LT1 was neck and neck with the little 302, GM copied Windsor as best they could, just added a few modern touches. That's why there's nothing about LS architecture that's unique. Just the small block used recently.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

The lt1 thrashed the 30poo and the lt4 thrashed furds super low production scca race car 351.

There is nothing windsor about a ls. I can see where furd guys desire them after all the ls swaps in furds.

But wait a minute. Lots of SBC's in furds to.

snake95

Chevy retards who want a mustang. No surprise there. It's just a better car in every way.

S8ER95Z

iTrader: (3)

if the foxbody was as heavy as the fbody and geared as shitty the 302 would not even be remotely close in performance. Both of my Bone stock LT1 automatics hit bottom 14s (and one had 2:73 gearing). Neck and neck? How?

zz4camaro1980

Looks great!

Chris25

iTrader: (1)

Sheesh you would think with as cold as it has been Snake wouldn't be melting but here she is dripping all over the place.......... Blckmch go get the mop.
​​​​​

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

The mustang....fox especially is a cheap light sardine tin can to put a decent v8 in because it didn't come with a decent v8. That's about the extent of it. There's nothing better about them......they're light and that's all.



A few friends has had lt's and all ran great. A ****** stock fox ain't gonna run with them. Snails fox ran 15s stock.....in good da.
snowflakes cry in all weather.

snake95

Mine ran 15s with 2.4 sixty foot times and 0 traction. You're all about clean runs aren't you? If not then your Camaro is a fuggin 11.5 monster
My 87 coupe ran 13.98s with gears and shifter only, zero power mods.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

So you car ran 15s.....has nothing to do with my cars. But now that you mention it my camaro ran 11.5 w/o a dr on my 18s, a ls6 intake and over geared.

Sure you're coupe did that......sssuuurrreee . Damn that little bit of weight from the hatch cars kill those shitty 30p00s

But it still took mods to get it to run with stock lt and tpi cars tested faster than that stock. Good talk

snake95

So your Camaro is a mid 11 car and the million dollar Frankenstein is 12 sec car. Good talks all around!

spikestang

I'm willing to test one at the dyno/track

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

And both way faster than your max effort h/c turd with smooth idling stock motors.


lol