Epic SRK B/S thread of 2019
09-09-2024, 08:36 PM
#9121
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Not really....my car just got done. Really it's not done it needs regeared now. Idk when that will happen or when I'll run it. As I stated before I'm just happy to be driving it.
Besides... I'm not bragging about what it did like you. I'm simply stating what the dyno said and you bitches are crying about it.
So post up what that junk ran.
Besides... I'm not bragging about what it did like you. I'm simply stating what the dyno said and you bitches are crying about it.
So post up what that junk ran.
09-10-2024, 07:45 AM
#9122
Not really....my car just got done. Really it's not done it needs regeared now. Idk when that will happen or when I'll run it. As I stated before I'm just happy to be driving it.
Besides... I'm not bragging about what it did like you. I'm simply stating what the dyno said and you bitches are crying about it.
So post up what that junk ran.
Besides... I'm not bragging about what it did like you. I'm simply stating what the dyno said and you bitches are crying about it.
So post up what that junk ran.
09-10-2024, 09:09 AM
#9123
Hio local guy last week got one in before rain in his new Coyote. Last one went 10.19 but was lighter since it was a 22.
10.3 137
1 78 headers with cats. 3.0 Whipple. 315 gears. Carbon Fiber Ds. Rear seat delete. Heavy duty half shafts. Drag radials in drag pack. That is insane. Not even a real tune on it. Terrible air. Decent tune air that is a 9 second car. I don't see a 6 th gen SS doing that despite having a bigger motor. They are not boost friendly. Those Ford 4 valves love boost. Even the Gen 1 Coyote.
Older mods had weak bottom end shame. Even so 8 pounds of boost through to one they gained a ton.
10.3 137
1 78 headers with cats. 3.0 Whipple. 315 gears. Carbon Fiber Ds. Rear seat delete. Heavy duty half shafts. Drag radials in drag pack. That is insane. Not even a real tune on it. Terrible air. Decent tune air that is a 9 second car. I don't see a 6 th gen SS doing that despite having a bigger motor. They are not boost friendly. Those Ford 4 valves love boost. Even the Gen 1 Coyote.
Older mods had weak bottom end shame. Even so 8 pounds of boost through to one they gained a ton.
09-10-2024, 09:52 AM
#9124
10 Second Club
09-10-2024, 10:00 AM
#9125
Objectively wrong again
HP is one of many measurements of power.
TQ is not power because torque can’t predict rate of work while that’s exactly what power does.
You keep harping on this “HP is only a calculation” because your backwoods inability to understand basic physics leads to you think that statement discredits the entire concept.
It doesn’t, it only highlights the reality that you straight up don’t understand the concepts you’re arguing about.
moron has a meaning too and you meet it
Jack **** is what it makes
Is Sally had a dick she’d be Sal.
It’s cam only Coyote power. 😂
only smart enough to discuss topics I actually understand, unlike yourself
also unlike yourself I’m smart enough to know that anything over a 346.5 is a 347 following standard rounding convention
HP is one of many measurements of power.
TQ is not power because torque can’t predict rate of work while that’s exactly what power does.
You keep harping on this “HP is only a calculation” because your backwoods inability to understand basic physics leads to you think that statement discredits the entire concept.
It doesn’t, it only highlights the reality that you straight up don’t understand the concepts you’re arguing about.
moron has a meaning too and you meet it
Idk what my 346 makes 8600.
But if it was intended to turn 8600 it would make alot more than 300tq.
This is just a pump gas build that is basically sbe other than the pistons. And it's got yall turnt
You're not very smart for someone who took physics.......are you sure you dont mean physicals. Like **** physicals. Because it's definitely not numbers......or you would know my 346 isn't a 347. It's actually a 346.
also unlike yourself I’m smart enough to know that anything over a 346.5 is a 347 following standard rounding convention
09-10-2024, 03:29 PM
#9128
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
no you don't.....but you're on here moufin like a bitch. So basically you were on that same happy *** dyno.
I will go run mine. It won't happen right away and I've said why. I still may but with the gearing like it is it's not optimal at all. It likely runs 60mph in first gear now.
So what did your junky ****** furd turd run again? You have 2 fake ****** dyno builds with no real results with lots of vlaims you can't back up.
I will go run mine. It won't happen right away and I've said why. I still may but with the gearing like it is it's not optimal at all. It likely runs 60mph in first gear now.
So what did your junky ****** furd turd run again? You have 2 fake ****** dyno builds with no real results with lots of vlaims you can't back up.
09-10-2024, 03:34 PM
#9129
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Objectively wrong again
HP is one of many measurements of power.
TQ is not power because torque can’t predict rate of work while that’s exactly what power does.
You keep harping on this “HP is only a calculation” because your backwoods inability to understand basic physics leads to you think that statement discredits the entire concept.
It doesn’t, it only highlights the reality that you straight up don’t understand the concepts you’re arguing about.
moron has a meaning too and you meet it
Jack **** is what it makes
Is Sally had a dick she’d be Sal.
It’s cam only Coyote power. 😂
only smart enough to discuss topics I actually understand, unlike yourself
also unlike yourself I’m smart enough to know that anything over a 346.5 is a 347 following standard rounding convention
HP is one of many measurements of power.
TQ is not power because torque can’t predict rate of work while that’s exactly what power does.
You keep harping on this “HP is only a calculation” because your backwoods inability to understand basic physics leads to you think that statement discredits the entire concept.
It doesn’t, it only highlights the reality that you straight up don’t understand the concepts you’re arguing about.
moron has a meaning too and you meet it
Jack **** is what it makes
Is Sally had a dick she’d be Sal.
It’s cam only Coyote power. 😂
only smart enough to discuss topics I actually understand, unlike yourself
also unlike yourself I’m smart enough to know that anything over a 346.5 is a 347 following standard rounding convention
Or we can just call **** what it is.
Tq is power. You don't tq a bolt/nut in hp and you still get work done. Higher tq on that bolt/nut takes more power to tq it doesn't it.
Here's the problem.....you're ******* stupid.
09-10-2024, 04:40 PM
#9130
no you don't.....but you're on here moufin like a bitch. So basically you were on that same happy *** dyno.
I will go run mine. It won't happen right away and I've said why. I still may but with the gearing like it is it's not optimal at all. It likely runs 60mph in first gear now.
So what did your junky ****** furd turd run again? You have 2 fake ****** dyno builds with no real results with lots of vlaims you can't back up.
I will go run mine. It won't happen right away and I've said why. I still may but with the gearing like it is it's not optimal at all. It likely runs 60mph in first gear now.
So what did your junky ****** furd turd run again? You have 2 fake ****** dyno builds with no real results with lots of vlaims you can't back up.
09-10-2024, 05:16 PM
#9132
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
I thought you claimed no way to cheat a dyno jet.....now your starry has changed. You just got busted af🤣🤣🤣
Run along boi
09-10-2024, 09:40 PM
#9133
Radial- Your ET / MPH is 9.38 seconds and MPH of 144.02 MPH
computed from your vehicle weight of 3700 pounds and Flywheel HP of 885. (12% loss)
Bias ply- Your ET / MPH is 9.52 seconds and MPH of 141.93 MPH
computed from your vehicle weight of 3700 pounds and HP of 847.
So yes it was backed up. In fact I beat it.
Car also went 140 @ 3750 making 713 on a radial.
Your ET / MPH is 9.75 seconds and MPH of 138.57 MPH
computed from your vehicle weight of 3750 pounds and HP of 799 . (12%) loss
Doug I am willing to show my dyno graphs with the weather data. Are you?
The following users liked this post:
HioSSilver (09-11-2024)
09-11-2024, 08:02 AM
#9138
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Made 790 SAE WHP (on a radial) @3700lbs. Went 144mph on a bias ply (would have went a little faster on a radial) lost about 40 whp with the bias ply on the dyno 756 with bias ply.
Radial- Your ET / MPH is 9.38 seconds and MPH of 144.02 MPH
computed from your vehicle weight of 3700 pounds and Flywheel HP of 885. (12% loss)
Bias ply- Your ET / MPH is 9.52 seconds and MPH of 141.93 MPH
computed from your vehicle weight of 3700 pounds and HP of 847.
So yes it was backed up. In fact I beat it.
Car also went 140 @ 3750 making 713 on a radial.
Your ET / MPH is 9.75 seconds and MPH of 138.57 MPH
computed from your vehicle weight of 3750 pounds and HP of 799 . (12%) loss
Doug I am willing to show my dyno graphs with the weather data. Are you?
Radial- Your ET / MPH is 9.38 seconds and MPH of 144.02 MPH
computed from your vehicle weight of 3700 pounds and Flywheel HP of 885. (12% loss)
Bias ply- Your ET / MPH is 9.52 seconds and MPH of 141.93 MPH
computed from your vehicle weight of 3700 pounds and HP of 847.
So yes it was backed up. In fact I beat it.
Car also went 140 @ 3750 making 713 on a radial.
Your ET / MPH is 9.75 seconds and MPH of 138.57 MPH
computed from your vehicle weight of 3750 pounds and HP of 799 . (12%) loss
Doug I am willing to show my dyno graphs with the weather data. Are you?
Post up what your junk ran et/mph instead of calc'n it.
Dyno weather? It was hot and humid.....****** August dude.
09-11-2024, 09:20 AM
#9139
09-11-2024, 09:44 AM
#9140
so I guess we can round my 548 up to 550 and since yalls junk turd only made fake 494 that gets called 490.......by your standards of course.
Or we can just call **** what it is.
Tq is power. You don't tq a bolt/nut in hp and you still get work done. Higher tq on that bolt/nut takes more power to tq it doesn't it.
Here's the problem.....you're ******* stupid.
Or we can just call **** what it is.
Tq is power. You don't tq a bolt/nut in hp and you still get work done. Higher tq on that bolt/nut takes more power to tq it doesn't it.
Here's the problem.....you're ******* stupid.
Power has a definition, I’ve given it to you repeatedly.
Your bolt analogy actually debunks you but you’re legitimately too stupid to understand why that is.
Let me help with what power actually is:
I know you can’t understand anything there, it just needs to be shared for posterity’s sake.
What does 440 lb-ft tell me about rate of work, dumbass?
”Torque is power” - WRONG