LT1 camero. Fastest stock NA pony car ever?
So it took furd nearly 10 ******* years to catch up......to a chassis and engine from the mid 2000s??? And using a a10......gtfo. the stick car dark turd went 12.5@115.....and you idiots still probably think a boss is faster.
And ALL OF THEM WITH LESS TM THAN THE Z28.
Yall simply don't know but you'll sure run your mouf about it.
Tell us more about all your racing experiences. Especially the furd stuff. 😆😆🤣🤣
Meanwhile....the 6gen has still been faster than a dark turd.
And ALL OF THEM WITH LESS TM THAN THE Z28.
Yall simply don't know but you'll sure run your mouf about it.
Tell us more about all your racing experiences. Especially the furd stuff. 😆😆🤣🤣
Meanwhile....the 6gen has still been faster than a dark turd.
Banned
Joined: Jul 2024
Posts: 16
Likes: 20
All tq management in the z28 can easily cost it .5. We know this from the 1le 5gen.
Since you're such a great furd turd you shoulda done tested it to know.....but you're really just a less that average idiot that spews bullshit out your stank mouf. BECAUSE WHAT YOU DO OWN AND WHAT YOU HAVE BUILT DOES MATTER.....you ******* clueless moron
Both of you 2 morons are a ******* clown. Neither of you has done anything na to even keep up with a ls1 with no ******* headers🤣🤣🤣
I guess both of you coulda probably took my bolt on ls6 and made it run 9s. If yall woulda had any say in say 346 build it woulda probably made 600whp if you weren't so eat up with not believing it.......so in the end this dumbass hillbilly has made yall look ******* stupid with just a basic understanding of cars🤣🤣🤣🤣
other than that i see no ******* reason to decipher yalls bullshit.
tell the class about your 14sec 4v build.
Wasn't there a boss bolt on build on here back in the day??? Oohh yea there was and it was no faster than 5br0s. Boss's weren't that fast....but hey you can probably find some yt vids where you don't actually know wtf was done eehh.
Meanwhile you've actually done ******* nothing of your own.
Since you're such a great furd turd you shoulda done tested it to know.....but you're really just a less that average idiot that spews bullshit out your stank mouf. BECAUSE WHAT YOU DO OWN AND WHAT YOU HAVE BUILT DOES MATTER.....you ******* clueless moron
Both of you 2 morons are a ******* clown. Neither of you has done anything na to even keep up with a ls1 with no ******* headers🤣🤣🤣
I guess both of you coulda probably took my bolt on ls6 and made it run 9s. If yall woulda had any say in say 346 build it woulda probably made 600whp if you weren't so eat up with not believing it.......so in the end this dumbass hillbilly has made yall look ******* stupid with just a basic understanding of cars🤣🤣🤣🤣
other than that i see no ******* reason to decipher yalls bullshit.
tell the class about your 14sec 4v build.
Wasn't there a boss bolt on build on here back in the day??? Oohh yea there was and it was no faster than 5br0s. Boss's weren't that fast....but hey you can probably find some yt vids where you don't actually know wtf was done eehh.
Meanwhile you've actually done ******* nothing of your own.
They actually didn't, a mere 3 years later Ford ran 12.1@120 with performance pack GT. GM had to gut the fat bastard just to make it competitive. Better give it thin glass, one speaker, and no A/C just so we can have a drivers race with a Boss 302. Don't talk to me about racing, you haven't made a pass in 10 ******* years. Post the magazine link to a 6th gen running faster than a 12.0@120, I'll wait.
You could have ac and a stereo if you wanted it on a z28. Not gutted at all....it still seated 4 people.
it's all about tq. You're just not smart enough to know it. Easy question to answer. Do you want more tq or less tq?
Teching In
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 6
Likes: 191
From: FL
How much torque do I need to make that happen?
Answer the question or Jenny is going to torque your ******* with her 445 lb-ft strap on, Forrest Jr.
There is no mag testing a 5br0 at 12.0 at 120.....for sure not with a stick. And I've seen the a10 5br0s run in negative da and they didn't reach 120. The 5br0 can't compete with the z28 or lt1 with a manual.
You could have ac and a stereo if you wanted it on a z28. Not gutted at all....it still seated 4 people.
it's all about tq. You're just not smart enough to know it. Easy question to answer. Do you want more tq or less tq?
You could have ac and a stereo if you wanted it on a z28. Not gutted at all....it still seated 4 people.
it's all about tq. You're just not smart enough to know it. Easy question to answer. Do you want more tq or less tq?
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...n-performance/
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2...t-test-review/
You coulda said yes you want more tq then. Because that's the only power a engine makes.....and it's not a stationary force.
The only way that modular **** can even attempt to keep up is by using more gear and work harder via more rpm.......and gear only multiplies tq.
Wow another post with nothing about any of your builds. Odd....I figured from all the moufin you do you would have some experience. Especially since you're talking **** to someone that made a living in racing for 20yrs and playing with hotrods for way longer. But you have nothing.
No care about autos. As you can tell the a10 is much much faster than the manual in a Mustang. Do you know why?
If autos are in play then so are ev's. To date there isn't really a mustang or camaro that can hang with the ev's out there. So if you're going auto it may *** well be a faster ev for the $$
c&d went 12.4 with a gt350. That's about as good as I seen for the gt350.
The r is a 2seat car. It's not even in the conversation. Plus with 10k worth of wheels it's priced far more.
The only way that modular **** can even attempt to keep up is by using more gear and work harder via more rpm.......and gear only multiplies tq.
Here's a 12.1@120 and a 12.0@119. Cry harder bitch. No one said anything about manual transmissions.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...n-performance/
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2...t-test-review/
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...n-performance/
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2...t-test-review/
If autos are in play then so are ev's. To date there isn't really a mustang or camaro that can hang with the ev's out there. So if you're going auto it may *** well be a faster ev for the $$
The r is a 2seat car. It's not even in the conversation. Plus with 10k worth of wheels it's priced far more.
Teching In
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 6
Likes: 191
From: FL
You coulda said yes you want more tq then. Because that's the only power a engine makes.....and it's not a stationary force.
The only way that modular **** can even attempt to keep up is by using more gear and work harder via more rpm.......and gear only multiplies tq.
The only way that modular **** can even attempt to keep up is by using more gear and work harder via more rpm.......and gear only multiplies tq.
PS. Torque can absolutely be a “stationary force”.
Odd how you deflected from such a basic question again.
I’ll give you the answer by the way.
The answer was, “I don’t know because a torque value can’t predict acceleration rate. My name is Doug and I’m so unbelievably deluded that I think I’m more clever than James Watt but I’m really as dumb as Forrest Gump.”
Last edited by LSux; Sep 18, 2024 at 09:03 PM.
No care about autos. As you can tell the a10 is much much faster than the manual in a Mustang. Do you know why?
If autos are in play then so are ev's. To date there isn't really a mustang or camaro that can hang with the ev's out there. So if you're going auto it may *** well be a faster ev for the $$
.
If autos are in play then so are ev's. To date there isn't really a mustang or camaro that can hang with the ev's out there. So if you're going auto it may *** well be a faster ev for the $$
.
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 226
From: over dere
Thought the LT1 would have more advantage down low cause it’s not a revvy
engine but they actually start to dog walk the coyotards up top. Too bad GM was too rainbow to at least put the LT2 intake on the last cameros too cause it basically is a completely unintrusive 15-20 more rwhp and 500 rpm
engine but they actually start to dog walk the coyotards up top. Too bad GM was too rainbow to at least put the LT2 intake on the last cameros too cause it basically is a completely unintrusive 15-20 more rwhp and 500 rpm
PS. Torque can absolutely be a “stationary force”.
Odd how you deflected from such a basic question again.
I’ll give you the answer by the way.
The answer was, “I don’t know because a torque value can’t predict acceleration rate. My name is Doug and I’m so unbelievably deluded that I think I’m more clever than James Watt but I’m really as dumb as Forrest Gump.”
Is it when you're talking about running engines......no dumbass it isn't.
Any serious racer knows that automatic is the way to go, you're just backpedaling because I slapped you in the face with facts. I know exactly why it's faster, Mustang has a more limited powerband and the A10 takes advantage. Funny how the LT1 isn't faster than the Mustang with the A10.
The only thing you're getting slapped is your *** from your bf nutz.
‐------------------
It's amazing how smart you dumbfucks think you are while not doing a ******* thing with your own ****. That leads me to believe your either not capable at all or you really are the stupid fucktards I think you are.
a stick is faster. A auto is just faster for someone like you.
The only thing you're getting slapped is your *** from your bf nutz.
It's amazing how smart you dumbfucks think you are while not doing a ******* thing with your own ****. That leads me to believe your either not capable at all or you really are the stupid fucktards I think you are.
The only thing you're getting slapped is your *** from your bf nutz.
It's amazing how smart you dumbfucks think you are while not doing a ******* thing with your own ****. That leads me to believe your either not capable at all or you really are the stupid fucktards I think you are.
Teching In
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 6
Likes: 191
From: FL
It’s kind of the crux of your inability to comprehend these principles.
James Watt got it right, you continue to get it wrong.
Torque is not power
Last edited by LSux; Sep 19, 2024 at 03:20 PM.
But it's not in running engine context. You seem to think it still is.
Do you want more tq or less tq in a running engine?