My GTO vs Supra TT question?
#43
I bet with all those mods the GTO is putting on, with the wet shot, 500+ rwhp should be attainable. From what I've seen guys with the LS2 doing in the GTO, damn near 400rwhp with the bolt ons seems attainable. Tack a 150 shot on and on paper, the GTO should get the nod. Bottom line, anything can happen
#44
lol supras are slow. my buddies 04 Mach1 5-speed w/ programmer, intake, and x-pipe beat a 96tt supra that had FMIC, intake, turboback, bov, and boost controller. pulled prolly 2 car lengths @ 120mph from a dig. dont worry. go waste his ***
#45
Originally Posted by 02Vortech
lol supras are slow. my buddies 04 Mach1 5-speed w/ programmer, intake, and x-pipe beat a 96tt supra that had FMIC, intake, turboback, bov, and boost controller. pulled prolly 2 car lengths @ 120mph from a dig. dont worry. go waste his ***
#46
Originally Posted by 02Vortech
lol supras are slow. my buddies 04 Mach1 5-speed w/ programmer, intake, and x-pipe beat a 96tt supra that had FMIC, intake, turboback, bov, and boost controller. pulled prolly 2 car lengths @ 120mph from a dig. dont worry. go waste his ***
#47
Originally Posted by 02Vortech
lol supras are slow. my buddies 04 Mach1 5-speed w/ programmer, intake, and x-pipe beat a 96tt supra that had FMIC, intake, turboback, bov, and boost controller. pulled prolly 2 car lengths @ 120mph from a dig. dont worry. go waste his ***
#48
FEARSM,
All 96tt Supra's were autos,due to the fact Toyota had emission compliance issues with first year ( 96 ) OBD II systems for 6 spd's. So no 6 spd's were available for US market, but then again I could be talking out of my *** if the guy did a 6spd swap
All 96tt Supra's were autos,due to the fact Toyota had emission compliance issues with first year ( 96 ) OBD II systems for 6 spd's. So no 6 spd's were available for US market, but then again I could be talking out of my *** if the guy did a 6spd swap
#50
Originally Posted by 02Vortech
lol supras are slow. my buddies 04 Mach1 5-speed w/ programmer, intake, and x-pipe beat a 96tt supra that had FMIC, intake, turboback, bov, and boost controller. pulled prolly 2 car lengths @ 120mph from a dig. dont worry. go waste his ***
I know a few years ago I personally raced a friends bone stock anthracite 93 TT Supra, auto. 13.9 @ 109mph it ran. Bone stock. The 60 foot was in the mid 2.x range. My Talon was running mid 13's then at 95-97mph. He flew by me right at the finish line.
His car BPU managed an 11.1 @ 118ish mph with a built tranny.
Basically, what I'm saying is that there was something wrong with that TT that raced the Mach1.
#51
Originally Posted by supratool
FEARSM,
All 96tt Supra's were autos,due to the fact Toyota had emission compliance issues with first year ( 96 ) OBD II systems for 6 spd's. So no 6 spd's were available for US market, but then again I could be talking out of my *** if the guy did a 6spd swap
All 96tt Supra's were autos,due to the fact Toyota had emission compliance issues with first year ( 96 ) OBD II systems for 6 spd's. So no 6 spd's were available for US market, but then again I could be talking out of my *** if the guy did a 6spd swap
LOL..I have owned several Supras. I know that. I was trying to see if HE knew what he was talking about or making the mods up. He seemed to know alot about the car. Just seeing if it was legit.
#52
Originally Posted by diambo4life
Basically, what I'm saying is that there was something wrong with that TT that raced the Mach1.
#55
Originally Posted by dailydriver
There ALWAYS is whenever a MKIV loses, right?? We ALL know that they are TOTALLY INVINCIBLE, from pure stock right up to 2500 rwhp with a single the size of a beach ball.
Are you brain dead? Did you not gather from my post that I did beat a stock TT with my mid 13 sec Talon? WTF said they were invincible? I am just making an assessment from facts presented. Would you swallow a story where a FWD SRT4 murdered a stalled nitroused auto LS1 from a dig? You would be skeptical, and so am I, about his "story."
Roll all you want. That car (he listed is not beating a BPU++ TT) if his story is indeed factual. If it did, there was something certainly wrong with the TT because in an ideal scenario, it (the TT) makes more power. There: Broke it down for even the 4th graders. We all know it's the internet where everyone makes 10,000whp and never lose a race.
Originally Posted by tx3
whats the difference between a 600hp supra and an 800hp supra?
theyre both 12 seconds cars
theyre both 12 seconds cars
#56
Originally Posted by 02Vortech
lol supras are slow. my buddies 04 Mach1 5-speed w/ programmer, intake, and x-pipe beat a 96tt supra that had FMIC, intake, turboback, bov, and boost controller. pulled prolly 2 car lengths @ 120mph from a dig. dont worry. go waste his ***
#60
Originally Posted by diambo4life
Are you brain dead? Did you not gather from my post that I did beat a stock TT with my mid 13 sec Talon? WTF said they were invincible? I am just making an assessment from facts presented. Would you swallow a story where a FWD SRT4 murdered a stalled nitroused auto LS1 from a dig? You would be skeptical, and so am I, about his "story."
Roll all you want. That car (he listed is not beating a BPU++ TT) if his story is indeed factual. If it did, there was something certainly wrong with the TT because in an ideal scenario, it (the TT) makes more power. There: Broke it down for even the 4th graders. We all know it's the internet where everyone makes 10,000whp and never lose a race.
Roll all you want. That car (he listed is not beating a BPU++ TT) if his story is indeed factual. If it did, there was something certainly wrong with the TT because in an ideal scenario, it (the TT) makes more power. There: Broke it down for even the 4th graders. We all know it's the internet where everyone makes 10,000whp and never lose a race.
Maybe you are right for questioning if something was not right with the GTE. But that is also part of the problem here, all of those +++++++++++++s after the BPU on these cars. Has anyone ever made an "official" listing of what each one means (that is totally agreed upon by all)?? Why not just go ahead and list every one of their mods instead (like all other cars do, except for the few "stage" listed turbo cars)? Would it take 3 pages or what?