2000 WS6 M6 vrs 2005 stang GT
#41
The 05/06 GT's are overrated! I cant believe you think you can beat his Mach. I have raced a couple GT's and they were dogs. They were both bone stock but they couldnt hang. TheBigThree
#44
Originally Posted by 2001ramairconv
Since no else has done this I will. I'm calling you out show a timeslip or lets get it just because you have beaten one car on the street and another at the track (supposedly) prove it. If not shut up about how fast your car is. You have other Mustang owners calling you a tard and they are usually a pretty tight group. Makes you wonder.
The times will shock you.
Last edited by TheBigthree; 10-01-2006 at 02:45 AM.
#45
Originally Posted by BayAreaSS
The 05/06 GT's are overrated! I cant believe you think you can beat his Mach. I have raced a couple GT's and they were dogs. They were both bone stock but they couldnt hang. TheBigThree
#46
Originally Posted by 2001ramairconv
Looks like at best a 14.7 my wife's Subaru does better than that. If I was you I'd quit while I was ahead. A LS1 car with a bad driver and no traction could better that.
#47
Originally Posted by TheBigthree
These Stang owners on this site represent only a small portion. They are house trained. I'm not. I'm wild. Anyway, Here's a slip of me racing an LS1 Camaro. The guy was cool and we was complimenting each other's car before the race. This is at 5800ft and our track sucks as far as prep goes.
The times will shock you.
The times will shock you.
run was at 7:16pm
I was marked vehicle 823
Results:
Me ---------- Him
R/T - .108 ---------- .441
60' - 2.306 ---------- 2.359
330 - 6.234 ---------- 6.630
1/8 - 9.437 ---------- 9.861
MPH - 77.46 ---------- 77.14
1000 - 12.245 ---------- 12.604
1/4 - 14.658 ---------- 14.922
MPH - 93.30 ---------- 96.31
Left 1st .5974
Heck, bring yourself to Dallas, Texas and let me hand it to ya - in my Extended cab Pickup.
Last edited by 93ChevExt5.7; 10-01-2006 at 02:23 AM.
#48
Originally Posted by TheBigthree
I don't care who you've raced. LS1's are seriously overratted. You will be a thing of the past when the Boss 302 comes back. It's coming to compete with the new camaro. It's going to be a 5.0 or 5.4. It's going to be rated at 390, probably de-tuned like the S197's. Then we can see what's up between Ford and Chevy because the cubes will be closer. I know I can run with the Mach, but I like Mach's because it runs with LS1's and it's a 4.6 as well.
Its time you be quite and mod your car. Come back when its REALLY in the Low 13's
#49
These links give you an Idea of how 5800ft affect your times.
C6 vette vs. Modded S4
Here's an STI time at my track. The STI is on the left.
Here's the mighty LS1 at the same track. This was a sub par run for an LS1. It should be mid to low 14's.
Our track sucks as far as prep goes during test and tune, so you do a lot of spinning that you wouldn't do on the street. Most of you guys would be running 13's, 14's and 15's out here depending on your mods.
C6 vette vs. Modded S4
Here's an STI time at my track. The STI is on the left.
Here's the mighty LS1 at the same track. This was a sub par run for an LS1. It should be mid to low 14's.
Our track sucks as far as prep goes during test and tune, so you do a lot of spinning that you wouldn't do on the street. Most of you guys would be running 13's, 14's and 15's out here depending on your mods.
#50
14.7 quarter *dies laughing* wtf did you have like 6 cinder blocks and your whole family in your car. *wipes the tears* Dude just shut up defending your "daddys little girl" car. Plus the 05/06 mustangs have a turning radius of almost 2.5 car lenghts with an my stock 89 and a few tight curves I could beat you cause youd hit a ******* tree.
#51
Originally Posted by BayAreaSS
I cant believe your acting like your car is fast You posted a slip of 14.7...I dont care what the conditions were you should be embarassed!! I dont care about what ford has coming out. It took them long enough to build a fast car.(03/04 Cobra) And even then they had to supercharge it. So Im happy that ford is FINALLY trying to compete.
Its time you be quite and mod your car. Come back when its REALLY in the Low 13's
Its time you be quite and mod your car. Come back when its REALLY in the Low 13's
#52
this is a stock 89 times
1989 Pontiac 20th Anniv. Trans Am 5.1 14.2
heres where i found it.
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
1989 Pontiac 20th Anniv. Trans Am 5.1 14.2
heres where i found it.
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
#54
Originally Posted by 2001ramairconv
I was running 12's in a bolt on LT1 car at Bandimeer which is at at least 6800 and my LS1 is faster than that car. Quit making RICER excuses and admit your car while it could be fast ISN'T.
#55
Originally Posted by TheBigthree
You've exposed your ignorance if you don't know what altitude does to N/A cars. Go and get some experience. You'd run 15's out here partner. I like posting those times because right away it shows how much you know about racing in all conditions. You've let me know now that you don't know much.
P.S. I wish you wouldnt bring the cobras down with you because i doubt they're in the 14's
#58
Originally Posted by TrshdNScatrd
this is a stock 89 times
1989 Pontiac 20th Anniv. Trans Am 5.1 14.2
heres where i found it.
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
1989 Pontiac 20th Anniv. Trans Am 5.1 14.2
heres where i found it.
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
#60
Originally Posted by BayAreaSS
Me 15's . This guy gets funnier by the thread. How can i run 15's if my cars faster than yours and your in the 14's.
P.S. I wish you wouldnt bring the cobras down with you because i doubt they're in the 14's
P.S. I wish you wouldnt bring the cobras down with you because i doubt they're in the 14's
You should race at high altitudes before you knock times. You only show your ignorance.