Ran my first 99-04 GT Mustang...
07-22-2007, 10:43 PM
#41
here's another '02 GT that runs 13.086
http://www.mustangforums.com/timesli...TimeSlipID=112
oh wait **** he has VT stage II cams.....man so I havent been with the stang crowd for a while but do you guys consider cams, N2O, and FI bolt-ons now???
http://www.mustangforums.com/timesli...TimeSlipID=112
oh wait **** he has VT stage II cams.....man so I havent been with the stang crowd for a while but do you guys consider cams, N2O, and FI bolt-ons now???
07-22-2007, 10:54 PM
#46
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well you're showing me all these high-power Mustangs with shitty drivers... kinda makes it seem that you're implying that they don't have enough power to run 12s. And you never answered my question; Are you saying that the guy that ran a 13.1x with a few bolt-ons and 4.10s won't be able to get into the 12s with more power and drag radials?
07-22-2007, 10:59 PM
#47
Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Well you're showing me all these high-power Mustangs with shitty drivers... kinda makes it seem that you're implying that they don't have enough power to run 12s. And you never answered my question; Are you saying that the guy that ran a 13.1x with a few bolt-ons and 4.10s won't be able to get into the 12s with more power and drag radials?
I would assume if he spinning his *** off right now then yes he would hit 12's, but I dont know his bolt-on or the conditions of the track.....
07-22-2007, 11:00 PM
#48
Teching In
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Irunelevens
I know a guy that has an H-pipe, intake, tune, and 4.10s, and he ran a 13.1x @ 104mph on regular tires at normal pressure. He's just a very good driver. He's a set of DRs away from 12s. And that's not even close to full bolt-ons. 280whp is more than enough to run 12s 
07-22-2007, 11:01 PM
#51
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DRAGONLOVER
I agree. I'm doing 12.30's with DR's and only dyno'd 300rwhp on a Mustang Dyno. All of this, with 135,000 miles on the clock too.
07-22-2007, 11:09 PM
#52
Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Thank you... I don't know why this guy thinks 12s are that hard.
look im not gonna argue with you all night and start some stupid internet fight.....you have your facts on the matter and I have mine....lets leave it at that......I dont mean to come off as putting down the stangs b/c I actually like them, owned 3, just basing my facts on my own experience with 2V's....you can check out 2 of my stangs in this thread:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/general-lsx-automobile-discussion/752975-camaro-mustang-how-many-own-both.html
(check out post#7)
Last edited by 01FormulaTA; 07-22-2007 at 11:18 PM.
07-23-2007, 12:24 AM
#56
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12s are not hard.. my LT1 ran high 12s with headers/cai/tune/tires.
Although some of those trap speeds are pathetic.. I've never met a well running GT, at the track they all lay down high 13s.
Although some of those trap speeds are pathetic.. I've never met a well running GT, at the track they all lay down high 13s.
07-23-2007, 02:56 AM
#57
Originally Posted by urbanhunter44
12s are not hard.. my LT1 ran high 12s with headers/cai/tune/tires.
Although some of those trap speeds are pathetic.. I've never met a well running GT, at the track they all lay down high 13s.
Although some of those trap speeds are pathetic.. I've never met a well running GT, at the track they all lay down high 13s.
exactly, I never said 12's were hard.....just a little bit out of reach for a bolt-on 2V GT
07-23-2007, 01:22 PM
#59
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 01FormulaTA
exactly, I never said 12's were hard.....just a little bit out of reach for a bolt-on 2V GT
07-23-2007, 01:30 PM
#60
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mustang GT's must be a lot faster in other places than around here. I've walked a CAI/Full exhaust/UD pulley/4.10 2003 GT from a 50 roll like he was a complete joke. My car was completely stock, so what's that make me? 13.4 @ 106 maybe?
NO way this guy was even close to 12's. High 13's best, even that seems out of reach for as slow as this car was. I've beaten another GT with atleast exhaust by even more than this guy, so I don't think he had a bad running car.
DRIVE MOD doesn't mean **** from 50mph roll BTW.
Maybe if the car was set-up for drag on slicks MAYBE i would believe it, even then its a bit far-fetched.
NO way this guy was even close to 12's. High 13's best, even that seems out of reach for as slow as this car was. I've beaten another GT with atleast exhaust by even more than this guy, so I don't think he had a bad running car.
DRIVE MOD doesn't mean **** from 50mph roll BTW.
Maybe if the car was set-up for drag on slicks MAYBE i would believe it, even then its a bit far-fetched.