00ss VS 04mach 1
#142
#147
can we get a timeslip? Im not saying you didnt but want to see it before i believe it. This thread turned to **** but what did any of the ford guys expect did you see the name of the site your on this isnt svt.com.
#148
Not mad, just curious how you dropped 2 full seconds from stock and added 11mph (14.0@100 vs 12.0@111) with just 50 more rwhp and 200lbs less weight (3250 stock). What was your 60' on that "12.0" run?
Last edited by ta_06374; 06-20-2008 at 08:30 AM.
#150
its actually like 80 rwhp over stock and its brobably got a better power band in it now and its got gears. WHEN ARE WE GONNA RACE?
#152
what a bunch of **** yup mach 1's run like **** where im at and alot of n/a cars do. i dont know evryone's alt but ours is 3600ft and it sucks. we can go to houston or some where along the coast and pull almost 5-6 tenths fast just from elevation.most stock ls1's and ones with a few mods see 13.0-13.3's here and mach1's see about 13.7-14.1 full bolt on ls1's ive seen go 12.5-12.6 but i can tell you ive raced a mach 1 full bolt on with a 100 shot and me on motor from about a 30 roll and let out bottom of fourth i had 2 cars on him and i was all throttle no bottle so i dont know
#154
what a bunch of **** yup mach 1's run like **** where im at and alot of n/a cars do. i dont know evryone's alt but ours is 3600ft and it sucks. we can go to houston or some where along the coast and pull almost 5-6 tenths fast just from elevation.most stock ls1's and ones with a few mods see 13.0-13.3's here and mach1's see about 13.7-14.1 full bolt on ls1's ive seen go 12.5-12.6 but i can tell you ive raced a mach 1 full bolt on with a 100 shot and me on motor from about a 30 roll and let out bottom of fourth i had 2 cars on him and i was all throttle no bottle so i dont know
#155
#156
he wasnt a bad driver he didnt want any after that.i didnt know if he was spraying until we stoped and i asked him if he wanted to race again and both of us could spray then he said well i was spraying. so i wasnt impressed
#159
I am having a bit of a hard time with this as well. You mean your Mach 1 which weighed in heavier than my Z06, with worse aero, and dynoed ~50 rwhp less, is .3 tenths faster? Must have had great tires and a great 60'!
Of course let me qualify it a little, my lightened C5 Z06 weighed in at 3060lbs, dynoed 355rwhp/351rwtq (running rich as heck from the factory), and I had a crappy 2.04 60' (on stock GY SC tires with only a clean-off burnout)... Although my trap speed was a bit higher...
I'm not necessarily calling BS, just curious about tire and 60'...
Of course let me qualify it a little, my lightened C5 Z06 weighed in at 3060lbs, dynoed 355rwhp/351rwtq (running rich as heck from the factory), and I had a crappy 2.04 60' (on stock GY SC tires with only a clean-off burnout)... Although my trap speed was a bit higher...
I'm not necessarily calling BS, just curious about tire and 60'...
#160
I am having a bit of a hard time with this as well. You mean your Mach 1 which weighed in heavier than my Z06, with worse aero, and dynoed ~50 rwhp less, is .3 tenths faster? Must have had great tires and a great 60'!
Of course let me qualify it a little, my lightened C5 Z06 weighed in at 3060lbs, dynoed 355rwhp/351rwtq (running rich as heck from the factory), and I had a crappy 2.04 60' (on stock GY SC tires with only a clean-off burnout)... Although my trap speed was a bit higher...
I'm not necessarily calling BS, just curious about tire and 60'...
Of course let me qualify it a little, my lightened C5 Z06 weighed in at 3060lbs, dynoed 355rwhp/351rwtq (running rich as heck from the factory), and I had a crappy 2.04 60' (on stock GY SC tires with only a clean-off burnout)... Although my trap speed was a bit higher...
I'm not necessarily calling BS, just curious about tire and 60'...