02 Z28 vs 05+ Stang GT
#62
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I did'nt see much gain with the CMDP until the LT.
the only intakes that are worth it is the JLT II or the C&L, the MAF is large enough for most. I think the key thing is getting the right combonation of mods at the right time, some work well with others. I am sure its the same with any car.
Unfortunatly Cams don't do a whole lot for the 3v (25-30-hp) the OHC just don't lend well to cams like push rod motors do
#64
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have tried all 4 tunes at the track on that same day and there was a difference of 3 tenths between them. so not only are the right combo of mods but the tune is also important. If S197 guys insist to use canned tunes you must also be willing to make tweeks and changes to get the best out of your tune.
#65
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Key West, FL / Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yup. I drive a stockish LS1 and a stock S197 GT; I think I know what I'm talking about. With mods the bets are off, but you're going to have a hard time convincing me that an equally-modded LS1 won't stomp the 4.6 by the time third comes around.
I still love the GT though - it's here to stay.
I still love the GT though - it's here to stay.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#66
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
equally modded there before H/C just normal bolt ons there just about equal. i owned both a 99 ws-6 and my 07 gt with equal mods to both and they run almost the exact same 1/4 times. my et slips almost overlap each other and if it wasnt for the date being on it i wouldnt know the difference there that close
#68
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
well then he had a very good running ls1 and lived on the coast because my t/a had a few more mods than my mustang and it never came close to a 114 mph. it trapped consistent 110's which is wut my mustang traps but it doesnt have 4.11's,TB,MAF,suspension,dr's. theres waaay less money into my mustang than my t/a and it runs very similar tires. my t/a did run mid 12's tho but that was due to the dr's. if i had dr's on the stang it would run the exact same times
#69
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wanna see what an S197 can do with 4.10's and intake tune and exhaust(not even full)?
And to show it's not a fluke, here's another LS2 kill.
No supercharger necessary, just a few tweaks here and there.
Last edited by Loveracing; 07-02-2008 at 06:03 AM.
#70
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
well then he had a very good running ls1 and lived on the coast because my t/a had a few more mods than my mustang and it never came close to a 114 mph. it trapped consistent 110's which is wut my mustang traps but it doesnt have 4.11's,TB,MAF,suspension,dr's. theres waaay less money into my mustang than my t/a and it runs very similar tires. my t/a did run mid 12's tho but that was due to the dr's. if i had dr's on the stang it would run the exact same times
#71
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yes i do there 3 years apart but both ran within 2 weeks of each other.
3/28/05 4/15/08
99 ws-6 LT'S,susp,dr's,moser 12 bolt 07 gt manual,lt's pypes mid muffler,
4.11's,LM,lid,maf,tb,spec 4/flywheel stock tires,cai,93 tune, 3.31's
1.77 60 ft 2.14 60ft
5.29 330 ft 5.63 330ft
8.25 1/8th 8.45 1/8 th
85.47 mph 85.25 mph
10.67 1000ft 10.94 1000ft
12.68 1/4 13.02 1/4
110.04 mph 111.04 mph
3/28/05 4/15/08
99 ws-6 LT'S,susp,dr's,moser 12 bolt 07 gt manual,lt's pypes mid muffler,
4.11's,LM,lid,maf,tb,spec 4/flywheel stock tires,cai,93 tune, 3.31's
1.77 60 ft 2.14 60ft
5.29 330 ft 5.63 330ft
8.25 1/8th 8.45 1/8 th
85.47 mph 85.25 mph
10.67 1000ft 10.94 1000ft
12.68 1/4 13.02 1/4
110.04 mph 111.04 mph
#72
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yes i do there 3 years apart but both ran within 2 weeks of each other.
3/28/05 4/15/08
99 ws-6 LT'S,susp,dr's,moser 12 bolt 07 gt manual,lt's pypes mid muffler,
4.11's,LM,lid,maf,tb,spec 4/flywheel stock tires,cai,93 tune, 3.31's
1.77 60 ft 2.14 60ft
5.29 330 ft 5.63 330ft
8.25 1/8th 8.45 1/8 th
85.47 mph 85.25 mph
10.67 1000ft 10.94 1000ft
12.68 1/4 13.02 1/4
110.04 mph 111.04 mph
3/28/05 4/15/08
99 ws-6 LT'S,susp,dr's,moser 12 bolt 07 gt manual,lt's pypes mid muffler,
4.11's,LM,lid,maf,tb,spec 4/flywheel stock tires,cai,93 tune, 3.31's
1.77 60 ft 2.14 60ft
5.29 330 ft 5.63 330ft
8.25 1/8th 8.45 1/8 th
85.47 mph 85.25 mph
10.67 1000ft 10.94 1000ft
12.68 1/4 13.02 1/4
110.04 mph 111.04 mph
#73
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wanna see what an S197 can do with 4.10's and intake tune and exhaust(not even full)?
And to show it's not a fluke, here's another LS2 kill.
No supercharger necessary, just a few tweaks here and there.
A 3valve does not stand a chance mod for mod with equal drivers vs an LS1 much less an LS2, judge from what i've seen on the streets/track. Maybe we need better 3valve drivers?
yes i do there 3 years apart but both ran within 2 weeks of each other.
3/28/05 4/15/08
99 ws-6 LT'S,susp,dr's,moser 12 bolt 07 gt manual,lt's pypes mid muffler,
4.11's,LM,lid,maf,tb,spec 4/flywheel stock tires,cai,93 tune, 3.31's
1.77 60 ft 2.14 60ft
5.29 330 ft 5.63 330ft
8.25 1/8th 8.45 1/8 th
85.47 mph 85.25 mph
10.67 1000ft 10.94 1000ft
12.68 1/4 13.02 1/4
110.04 mph 111.04 mph
3/28/05 4/15/08
99 ws-6 LT'S,susp,dr's,moser 12 bolt 07 gt manual,lt's pypes mid muffler,
4.11's,LM,lid,maf,tb,spec 4/flywheel stock tires,cai,93 tune, 3.31's
1.77 60 ft 2.14 60ft
5.29 330 ft 5.63 330ft
8.25 1/8th 8.45 1/8 th
85.47 mph 85.25 mph
10.67 1000ft 10.94 1000ft
12.68 1/4 13.02 1/4
110.04 mph 111.04 mph
Also with your GT you had a 2.14 60ft compared to a 1.77 on the TA, of course you're gonna trap higher. It's cool to make comparisons but make sure you realize the differences.
#74
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You could drive better than the others in both those videos, not sure waht you're trying to prove?
A 3valve does not stand a chance mod for mod with equal drivers vs an LS1 much less an LS2, judge from what i've seen on the streets/track. Maybe we need better 3valve drivers?
So with LT's,suspension,radials,4.11s and a TB, you ET'd .3 faster than stock? Prolly had to do with putting an aftermarket MAF and not tuning it.
A 3valve does not stand a chance mod for mod with equal drivers vs an LS1 much less an LS2, judge from what i've seen on the streets/track. Maybe we need better 3valve drivers?
So with LT's,suspension,radials,4.11s and a TB, you ET'd .3 faster than stock? Prolly had to do with putting an aftermarket MAF and not tuning it.
![Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/rolleyes.gif)
#75
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You could drive better than the others in both those videos, not sure waht you're trying to prove?
A 3valve does not stand a chance mod for mod with equal drivers vs an LS1 much less an LS2, judge from what i've seen on the streets/track. Maybe we need better 3valve drivers?
So with LT's,suspension,radials,4.11s and a TB, you ET'd .3 faster than stock? Prolly had to do with putting an aftermarket MAF and not tuning it.
Also with your GT you had a 2.14 60ft compared to a 1.77 on the TA, of course you're gonna trap higher. It's cool to make comparisons but make sure you realize the differences.
A 3valve does not stand a chance mod for mod with equal drivers vs an LS1 much less an LS2, judge from what i've seen on the streets/track. Maybe we need better 3valve drivers?
So with LT's,suspension,radials,4.11s and a TB, you ET'd .3 faster than stock? Prolly had to do with putting an aftermarket MAF and not tuning it.
Also with your GT you had a 2.14 60ft compared to a 1.77 on the TA, of course you're gonna trap higher. It's cool to make comparisons but make sure you realize the differences.
Dude, he lost and he lost bad, and Everytime I race a stock GTO or CTS-V, or even a STock LS1, they're going to lose. What's the big deal? LS1's and 2's get beat. Cars get beat all the time. Don't bring up the mod for mod thing, because it doesn't change the fact that I won. Money can make any car fast.
There are so many Stangs out on the street, there has to be plenty of bad drivers out there. There are plenty at my track that were running .5 seconds slower than what me and my friends were running when we were stock. My friend troy raced the guy, beat him bad. I raced him again, beat him bad. I know what stock GT0's run at my track and they cannot beat me. No one's saying mod for mod, the 4.6 is going to outmod the LSx's. I don't care about that mod for mod stuff cuz there's always someone faster. When I slap a Hellion turbo on mine, it won't matter to me at all who's car does what. I'll just be adding kills. I'm about I'm pointing out that with a few smart mods, I can be fast enough to definately shock the over confident drivers you often see on the road. The guy even asked me if I had a supercharger in there. I raced a guy in a Ls1 camaro last year with my mods, cept he had opened his exhaust, he beat me bad. Now, I've opened my exhaust, I"ve run quicker than the time he posted when he clobbered me. I want to run into him again. If he's the same, It'll be a good race. I'll post it.
Last edited by Loveracing; 07-02-2008 at 07:52 PM.
#77
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i know that when u have a worse 60ft ur trap speed is better but its within a couple mph. yes my t/a was faster but not by much expecially with the other mods. as for a rush mustang only if u get a stage 2 or 3 with a supercharger but there not much faster than a fulll bolt on gt. the roots type charger sucks and i would personaly never buy a roush charger
#80
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i know that when u have a worse 60ft ur trap speed is better but its within a couple mph. yes my t/a was faster but not by much expecially with the other mods. as for a rush mustang only if u get a stage 2 or 3 with a supercharger but there not much faster than a fulll bolt on gt. the roots type charger sucks and i would personaly never buy a roush charger