Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

stock sway bars 32 and 19 mm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2011, 12:28 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
c4boom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pittsfield NH
Posts: 164
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default stock sway bars 32 and 19 mm

for some reason I thought If you have the 32 front the rear would also be larger than the standard. this is on my 01 SS?? im confused
Old 04-27-2011, 12:30 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (15)
 
MasterTomos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northeast Iowa
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

nope, all 93-02 V8 fbodys have the same size rear sway bar, 19mm
Old 04-27-2011, 12:37 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (51)
 
projectX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am going with a spohn 25mm rear
Old 04-27-2011, 01:10 PM
  #4  
Launching!
 
joe77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

guess your only planning on going in a straight line? your going to have the rear want to kick out more
Old 04-27-2011, 02:07 PM
  #5  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,587
Received 134 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

There is a lot of misinformaton and misunderstanding about bars.

Most V-8 4th gen's got 19mm's. Very few got 21's (1993 only 1LE's and 01-02 "1LE"'s that were SLP built not GM, and any car with an SLP option Bilstien Ultra Suspension). the '93 1LE had a 32, the others had 35mm front bars.

All other V-8 4th gens have 19mm rear bars. 30mm for Z28/Formula's, 32 for SS/WS6's.

You should not add a larger than stock rear bar, if you care about handling and balance without a larger front too. 30/19 is already too soft in front vs. the rear. 32/19 is a good match, just not the roll stiffness most want (which is why I run 35/22 as it's a similar balance with a lot more roll control). 32/25 is not a good driving setup, it will make the car much more prone to oversteer. If you are hellbent on a bigger rear bar, then please at least stay around 21-22mm.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450

18 SCCA National Championships in house, many more for our customers prove we know our stuff.Talk is cheap, results matter.

Check out our KONI prices, our Master Cylinder Brace, and new Xtracker Hub/wheel bearing upgrade kits!
Old 04-27-2011, 02:11 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
SSCamaro99_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ballwin, MO
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

No joke. I ran Sam's 35 front with my 19 rear for awhile. The car felt twitchy on exit. Getting the 22 on the back cleaned it up alot. Now once I get rid of these drag radials I will be happy.
Old 04-27-2011, 05:52 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SSCamaro99_3
No joke. I ran Sam's 35 front with my 19 rear for awhile. The car felt twitchy on exit. Getting the 22 on the back cleaned it up alot.


It was twitchy with 35mm hollow front and the 19mm solid rear and not twitchy after the 22mm hollow rear?

I have the 35mm/22mm combo as well and I agree that it seems well balanced. I just don't get why it would be twitchy with a somewhat softer rear bar. I suppose I don't get what you mean by twitchy.
Old 04-27-2011, 05:54 PM
  #8  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,587
Received 134 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

I think it's a classic case of meaning different things. I think he meant that before the rear was kind of lazy and ponderous vs. the front with the 35mm bar and that it wallowed around which might be what he means by twitchy.

I think of "twitchy" as loose, nervous, wanting to spin and too *much* rear bar will do that do you, not too little. But like most things there is a happy middle ground where you get good balance and feel both.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450

18 SCCA National Championships in house, many more for our customers prove we know our stuff.Talk is cheap, results matter.

Check out our KONI prices, our Master Cylinder Brace, and new Xtracker Hub/wheel bearing upgrade kits!
Old 04-27-2011, 07:08 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
lees02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 1,737
Received 148 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sam Strano
I think it's a classic case of meaning different things. I think he meant that before the rear was kind of lazy and ponderous vs. the front with the 35mm bar and that it wallowed around which might be what he means by twitchy.

I think of "twitchy" as loose, nervous, wanting to spin and too *much* rear bar will do that do you, not too little. But like most things there is a happy middle ground where you get good balance and feel both.
Wouldn't that be under steer/push with a 35/19? Staggered wheels sizes (fatter rears) could also increase understeer.
Old 04-28-2011, 12:35 AM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
libertyforall1776's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

There may not be many V6s here, but they came with 28mm Front/15mm Rear bars standard (I have a set for sale if anyone's interested), the SLP RS had an option to upgrade to 32/19 SS Sways too...

Old 04-28-2011, 12:58 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by libertyforall1776
There may not be many V6s here, but they came with 28mm Front/15mm Rear bars standard (I have a set for sale if anyone's interested), the SLP RS had an option to upgrade to 32/19 SS Sways too...
Yeah... perhaps another not optimal setup from SLP.

I actually ran a 1LE 32mm hollow front with the 15mm solid rear bar on my 2000 V6. You can get away with that because of the difference in balance between the front and rear springs on the V6 compared to the V8.

98+ V8: 292lb/in front, 114lb/in rear

98+ V6: 257lb/in front, 114lb/in rear

Same rear springs, softer front springs on the V6...

Really I think the 32 hollow / 17 solid (from 93-97 V6) might be slightly better than what I ran on the V6. Perhaps splitting hairs, but you can get away with a large bar on the front without getting "massive" understeer partly because improved camber control partly offsets the understeer tendency anyway. Back to the V6 setup, a fair number of people run 32/19 mainly because of the V8 parts must always be better mentality, although I am not convinced that is ideal for the stock rates. At least it isn't 32mm hollow / 21mm solid on the V6 which is worse than on the V8s IMO.
Old 04-28-2011, 04:32 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
libertyforall1776's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

^ So far I am happy with the sway performance improvement since swapping from the 28/15 to 32/19 on my RS... YMMV.

For the record, I did experiment with 32/15 for a while, but the front felt good and was overly happy pulling into turns with the rear feeling like it wanted to then slingshot into the turn, like a delayed reaction -- certainly not balanced. Might be interesting to try the 17 in the rear, however.

Last edited by libertyforall1776; 04-28-2011 at 04:49 PM. Reason: added detail
Old 04-28-2011, 06:57 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Interesting.

I also ran Bilstein HD's on the V6 with the 32mm / 15mm setup. I don't really recall anything like that, in fact I think it was almost as balanced as the Formula is now, just with less roll resistance due to the smaller bars and less spring rate. This was with a "symmetric" set of wheels and tires front to back.
Old 04-28-2011, 07:14 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
mitchntx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 6,480
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

By rule, CMC only allows the use of sway bars that came with the car. In the 4th gen's case, any sway bar that came from the dealer is legal.

So because we are limited on sway bar choices, we have to run what some consider insane spring rates.

For the last couple years I've been running a 750lb front spring and a 250lb rear spring with a 32mm front bar. I exchange the rear with a 19 or 21 depending upon the track scheduled for a particular race.

MSR-C is a smooth track, lots of mid or slow speed turns, with a LOT of off camber turns. I will install the 21mm rear to help the car rotate mid corner (on throttle) off.

TWS is a lot rougher, but most turns are on camber or flat and carry a LOT of speed. I'll go back to the 19 to help settle the rear.

I finally ran across an unobtainable 35mm SLP front bar. I installed it and ran MSR-C. And as I figured, the car had a mid-corner off push.

I installed 275 rear springs and it helped, but still had a push. I removed the 1/4" wheel spacer off the rear and went to a 1/8" ... helped more, but still not enough. So, I had to drive through it.

I now have a set of 300lb rear springs to try.

Even though I've done it a hundred times, it still amazes me how much difference a single change can make and the domino effect and work it takes to bring everything back to neutral.
Old 04-29-2011, 04:56 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
SSCamaro99_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ballwin, MO
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by lees02WS6
Wouldn't that be under steer/push with a 35/19? Staggered wheels sizes (fatter rears) could also increase understeer.
I probably chose the wrong word. On exit under power the front end would keep biting, and the back felt like it wanted to roll over (not flip over, just waiting for it to stop the body roll). Wallow probably would have been the better word. It would kind of lean, and then felt like it would bounce or snap (not hard, just rock a little) as the back end caught up to the front. Rear just felt slow. I guess I am just doing a terrible job of describing it. Bottome line matched set of bars is much more fun than a mismatched set.
Old 04-29-2011, 05:03 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
libertyforall1776's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Thumbs up

That is pretty much what I experienced on the RS with the 32/15 setup, when you say snap, that what I meant by slingshot feeling...

The 19 feels better back there.

Originally Posted by SSCamaro99_3
I probably chose the wrong word. On exit under power the front end would keep biting, and the back felt like it wanted to roll over (not flip over, just waiting for it to stop the body roll). Wallow probably would have been the better word. It would kind of lean, and then felt like it would bounce or snap (not hard, just rock a little) as the back end caught up to the front. Rear just felt slow. I guess I am just doing a terrible job of describing it. Bottome line matched set of bars is much more fun than a mismatched set.



Quick Reply: stock sway bars 32 and 19 mm



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 AM.