Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

Verifying Spring Rates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2013, 03:38 PM
  #1  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
02TransAm/Batmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southside Chicago
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Verifying Spring Rates

Hey guys, I'll be switching my Strano's to stock springs soon and I've always wanted to know the actual spring rate of cut stock springs. Well I finally found a shop nearby that tests spring rates and we'll all finally know soon. I think the unofficial quote is roughly a 10% increase for every coil you remove. Let's see how true this holds up.

Stay tuned!
Old 07-03-2013, 05:07 AM
  #2  
Staging Lane
 
Flubyux2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm interested.

My buddy just did 2 coils off the front of his z28. It was crazy low... Basically too low to drive. So I'd say between 1 and 1.5 coils ought to be safe. It'll be nice to know what the spring rate becomes.
Old 07-09-2013, 01:41 PM
  #3  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,587
Received 134 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

The rate change is dependent on how much of the working spring you remove. If there are 10 working coils and you take 1 out, that's about a 10% bump. But 1 coil on a 12 coil spring is less than that.

Also you need to test that very spring before you do anything to verify the actual rate, and you need to make sure you testing working rate on springs that are progressive.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450

18 SCCA National Championships in house, many more for our customers prove we know our stuff.Talk is cheap, results matter.

Check out our KONI prices, our Master Cylinder Brace, and new Xtracker Hub/wheel bearing upgrade kits!
Old 07-12-2013, 12:48 AM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
02TransAm/Batmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southside Chicago
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sam Strano
The rate change is dependent on how much of the working spring you remove. If there are 10 working coils and you take 1 out, that's about a 10% bump. But 1 coil on a 12 coil spring is less than that.

Also you need to test that very spring before you do anything to verify the actual rate, and you need to make sure you testing working rate on springs that are progressive.
I'll be installing stock springs so its baseline numbers are what, 292/114? Is that the actual rate you are talking about? GM rears are linear fronts and progressive rears right?

Anyway, with cut rear springs, my ride jumped back up roughly .75". Dammit! (Before with Strano's+Isolator: 27.25"; After with cut springs and HH mod: 28") I was hoping to test these springs tomorrow but it looks like I'm going to have to take 'em out, cut some more and test fit them first.

How much more should I cut off? A quarter of a coil, half?

Last edited by 02TransAm/Batmobile; 07-12-2013 at 01:13 AM.
Old 07-12-2013, 05:19 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,803
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02TransAm/Batmobile
I'll be installing stock springs so its baseline numbers are what, 292/114? Is that the actual rate you are talking about? GM rears are linear fronts and progressive rears right?

Anyway, with cut rear springs, my ride jumped back up roughly .75". Dammit! (Before with Strano's+Isolator: 27.25"; After with cut springs and HH mod: 28") I was hoping to test these springs tomorrow but it looks like I'm going to have to take 'em out, cut some more and test fit them first.

How much more should I cut off? A quarter of a coil, half?
Stock LS1 springs *should* be linear.
I think what Sam is saying is make sure to get a base line number before you cut because there are many variables at play here that could skew the numbers (much like getting a baseline dyno run).
What if you actually have LT1 springs? 1LE springs? What if the springs have just worn overtime and lost rate?
Get a base line to spring rate first, then cut, then get that spring rate to verify how much rate was actually gained.
Old 07-12-2013, 09:22 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
SparkyJJO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,195
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I still can't imagine why you'd want to go to a cut stock spring from what you have. It is like going backwards...

Gonna put some decarbons back on it too?
Old 07-12-2013, 11:46 AM
  #7  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Often, lowering springs are both shorter and higher rate.
So getting there by checkbook, or by cutting, what's the
diff?

Other than, you're figuring it out as you go, and could go
too far. And have only one degree of freedom. Where a
store-bought'n lowering spring, you can shop rate and
height independently.

But if you wanted 10% shorter and 10% stiffer, cutting
off 10% of the length would get you where you wanted
to go.

Problem being, most people don't really know what they
want.
Old 07-12-2013, 03:42 PM
  #8  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,587
Received 134 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

What I'm saying is that you guys often put the numbers in stone. Like 292/114, that's an approximate number. I worked on a car that had the same front springs stock as my '01, but the rears were different (1 less coil about the same wire size, which means stiffer, i.e. *NOT* the same rate as mine). Which were 114? Maybe neither.

So I'm saying you ought to rate yours first, so you aren't assuming something from the result that isn't true.

As for the idea of getting where you want to be by checkbook or by cutting. Not so simple. A 10% increase in rate doesn't exactly cover a 10% drop in ride height. Suspensions are not linear in their actions. Generally the lower you go the more rate you need or you will end up with the bumpstops doing more of the work than the springs. Frankly there is no science to figuring that out, which makes randomly cutting stuff a bug time guess. I played with a LOT of spring rates and ride height until I settled on what worked best for me, and that's how I made my springs come to be.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450

18 SCCA National Championships in house, many more for our customers prove we know our stuff.Talk is cheap, results matter.

Check out our KONI prices, our Master Cylinder Brace, and new Xtracker Hub/wheel bearing upgrade kits!
Old 07-12-2013, 03:58 PM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
02TransAm/Batmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southside Chicago
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sam Strano
What I'm saying is that you guys often put the numbers in stone. Like 292/114, that's an approximate number. I worked on a car that had the same front springs stock as my '01, but the rears were different (1 less coil about the same wire size, which means stiffer, i.e. *NOT* the same rate as mine). Which were 114? Maybe neither.

So I'm saying you ought to rate yours first, so you aren't assuming something from the result that isn't true.

As for the idea of getting where you want to be by checkbook or by cutting. Not so simple. A 10% increase in rate doesn't exactly cover a 10% drop in ride height. Suspensions are not linear in their actions. Generally the lower you go the more rate you need or you will end up with the bumpstops doing more of the work than the springs. Frankly there is no science to figuring that out, which makes randomly cutting stuff a bug time guess. I played with a LOT of spring rates and ride height until I settled on what worked best for me, and that's how I made my springs come to be.
I understand what you are saying. I'm not trying to give people a concrete answer as to what one coil will change their spring rate to as there are variables at play that may skew results - it's just meant to give people a ballpark figure. I'm sure stock springs aren't 292 exactly but more like 292 +/- 5 or so. It would also be dependent on exactly where the cut was made. But if cutting a coil results in an increase to 325/130 let's say hypothetically, it's jus a rough estimate that someone could take with them since no one has ever tested cut springs that I know of and so we could use as reference instead of hypothetical formulas. I'm sure there might be some variability with your spring rates too. I thought about testing yours when I take them off but it's 30 bucks to test per spring!
Old 07-12-2013, 04:08 PM
  #10  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,587
Received 134 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

I got ya... but remember this is the internet, and people tend to take what they read as gospel. Please bear that in mind, and it's for that reason it's pretty important to do a before/after test of the same springs otherwise it's not worth wasting your money because you'll get an erroneous result not knowing the baseline.

If it helps LT1 fronts were rated around 310 in front. A human can't feel anything less than about a 10% change, not really which is also something to consider.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450

18 SCCA National Championships in house, many more for our customers prove we know our stuff.Talk is cheap, results matter.

Check out our KONI prices, our Master Cylinder Brace, and new Xtracker Hub/wheel bearing upgrade kits!



Quick Reply: Verifying Spring Rates



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.