Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

Unsprung Weight Management

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2007, 01:59 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Shock Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Unsprung Weight Management

Intro:
Shock Hawk here. I'm getting my WS6 in the next 1-3 months and the first thing that I want to bolt on is a new rear. I'm hoping to do a Ford 9". The reason for this is that I plan to eventually run 550hp/tq. That'll probably tear the 10 bolt to pieces within a week with that kind of power (not to mention stock hp w/ M6 and drill mod). A 12 bolt will get the horrible whine that everyone talks about. The 9" is probably perfect, especially since I "jack rabbit" off the line a bit and am known for drifting a bit.

Goal:
My longterm intention is to have a car for autocross. Not a full blown race car, but a dd that can show off a bit on the track. I don't plan to win any races in it. I also might do some light drifting if I have a tire sponsor (not likely) or I'm about to buy new tires anyways.

Problem:
Here's my problem: the extra unsprung weight is not good for the handling, so I hear. The 9" is 25lb extra (I think). I'll have a hollow sway bar out back (-5lb) and probably some racing wheels when on the track (-16ish). The racing wheels are for the track only and it'll be close to stock weight. Off the track, I'll have my WS6 wheels and so I'll be 20lb over, more if I upgrade the brakes.

Facts:
I'm probably going with a full Strano suspension (not to mention LCA's, PHB, TA, etc.). I've read that you can control the unsprung weight with your shocks (compression dampening). I'm probably going for Konis. I want all good quality products, no half-assing it. Budget is not a problem within reason. I like the sound of the Konis and I was wondering if I can adjust them to counteract the extra unsprung weight. I'm going to suspect that you can only adjust rebound dampening on SA shocks. Thus I'd probably be looking at Koni DA's.

Question:
Could anyone tell me if Koni DA's could counteract this unsprung weight and by how much? Is there a better shock? Is there another way to reduce weight? Is this wishful thinking? Thx for reading the whole thing (or not).

Last edited by Shock Hawk; 07-08-2007 at 02:09 AM.
Old 07-08-2007, 04:02 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

pm sent
Old 07-08-2007, 11:35 AM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Shock Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bump for opinion
Old 07-08-2007, 12:10 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
 
DuronClocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Go Koni SA's. I have them on my car with the 9" and they deal with it fine. Ride quality is definitely affected with the heavier rear end and the 17's, but its still more than daily-driveable. The DA's offer a compression adjustment, but nobody ever uses it. They usually set it on the lowest setting, which makes them equivelent to a Koni SA. Some people even complain about the Koni SA's being slightly stiff on compression, but I'm very happy with them.

The rebound adjustability will be very good to have with the 9" and heavier wheels. Change springs when you do the shocks though. I didn't like how my stock springs felt on the Koni's. Definitely better all around with Strano's springs.
Old 07-08-2007, 01:10 PM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Shock Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thx, anyone else have an opinion or experience? Someone suggested that I try Penske 8100 shocks. Anyone have any experience with those either?

I'm going for better than stock. I want something that feels really good and will do very well on the slalom. Competition quality would be desirable, but I understand that the extra unsprung weight is a handicap.

Last edited by Shock Hawk; 07-08-2007 at 01:36 PM.
Old 07-08-2007, 01:39 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,803
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Honestly I think its going to be pretty difficult to auto-x/road race with a 550hp/tq car and a 9" rear end. Thats a whole lot of power to be trying to put down around turns...
Old 07-08-2007, 01:50 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
subtlez28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Janesville WI
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Not my area of knowledge...I actually have a couple hy-jack questions.
1. Your post says the 9" is 25lbs heavier. Is that accurate? Is 25lbs that big a deal?
2. I Know they make aluminum center sections for 9"s. How much weight do they save?
3. Isn't another prob w bigger rear ends the increased ride height due to bigger axle tubes?

I suppose these questions kind of belong in another section, but they seem relavent to this thread...
Old 07-08-2007, 06:43 PM
  #8  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Shock Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
Honestly I think its going to be pretty difficult to auto-x/road race with a 550hp/tq car and a 9" rear end. Thats a whole lot of power to be trying to put down around turns...
How much hp/tq is ideal for autocross? Also, if you have too much, isn't being light on the pedal a great way to limit the power (not pulling as much)?

I don't think there would be increased ride height. As long as the input pinion bisects the axles and you have the same wheels/tires and the room under the car for it, it shouldn't effect ride height at all.

Unsprung weight, if not controlled, makes the car feel like it's bouncing a bit after a bump (or so I hear).
Old 07-08-2007, 09:22 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,803
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Shock Hawk
How much hp/tq is ideal for autocross? Also, if you have too much, isn't being light on the pedal a great way to limit the power (not pulling as much)?
Im no expert, but there really isnt an "ideal" amount of power, but near stock power should be more than enough.
Old 07-08-2007, 11:42 PM
  #10  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Shock Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lets focus away from the power, I don't plan to touch it for about 3-5 years. I'll wait until my rebuild (probably at 200k) to upgrade the engine.

Here's my theory:
I need to adjust the compression dampening (on the DA). According to DuronClocker, the softest setting makes them similar to the SA's. If I use a firmer setting, it should dampen more weight. That would mean that if I'm running an extra 20lbs max on a rear end that is probably over 100lbs stock (including brakes and wheels), then I should have no problem controlling that extra unsprung weight (the extra weight is small in comparison to the overall weight). Can anyone help my theory?
Old 07-08-2007, 11:44 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
 
DuronClocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Compression dampening will make them stiffer upon hitting a bump/irregularity in the road, which will shock the car more. Softer is better here (to an extent of course). You're really looking to control the outward extension of the shock in this case, which would be the rebound dampening adjustment
Old 07-09-2007, 12:02 AM
  #12  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Shock Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, so I'm backwards. Would it work if I did the rebound dampening instead?
Old 07-09-2007, 12:15 AM
  #13  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
 
DuronClocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yes, which is why the SAs will work fine for you
Old 07-09-2007, 01:04 AM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
 
eLTwerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Even Strano has said that Koni DAs are somewhat of an overkill.
Old 07-09-2007, 01:07 AM
  #15  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Shock Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My question is if the DA's would be able to control the extra weight since you can adjust the rebound dampening on it. I would like it to feel like the stock rear with the Koni SA's.
Old 07-09-2007, 01:41 AM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
 
eLTwerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ask trackbird or Strano
Old 07-09-2007, 06:24 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (21)
 
coolformula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Greater Chattanooga
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Does the 9inch way more than just 25 pounds more? Konis SA will be good, your adding weight not good, but you have to a have a rear taht can handle the power!
Old 07-09-2007, 08:18 AM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
chupr0kabra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've got a Moser 12-bolt. A couple things I've learned from personal experience on this subject.
  1. Your ride height will change. The axle tubes are bigger, thereby moving where the spring mount plates are. It's about 0.5" higher in the back now than it was with my stock 10-bolt.
  2. There are a few ways to counter the increased weight.
    1. Lighter wheels. I've read that 1 lb on the wheels is like 7 lbs anywhere else on the car. I'm not sure how accurate that is, but it makes sense, since your wheels are the first things motivated by the drivetrain. Any good engine builder will tell you lower rotational mass (i.e. crankshaft, pistons, connecting rods) will result in an engine that spins up faster, and wheels are rotational mass.
    2. Lighter (hollow) swaybars. It's only a few pounds, but every little bit helps.
    3. Aluminum center section. I did a lot of reading/research before I made my decision to get a 12-bolt. Had I gone with a 9-inch, I would have gine with the aluminum center section. I chose the 12-bolt to retain ABS.
    4. Adjustable shocks. Compression adjustment will likely help, but it's still unsprung weight.
  3. You have to ask yourself what you want to do with the car. Why are you getting a 9-inch? Is it because you plan to drag race? If so, great, but you have to know there will be a sacrifice in handling. From what I've read, a lot of the auto-x guys run Torsen differentials in 10-bolt rearends. If it's not going to be a quarter miler, why get a 9-inch?
I'm not telling you "don't get a 9-inch". They're great, pretty much bulletproof, and there are tons of options out there for them. I upgraded my rearend to a 12-bolt because I have future plans to make more power and wanted a little added insurance. My goals with the car are to have a street-friendly, comfortable ride, with the option to go to the 1/4 mile occasionally. When I first got the 12-bolt, I was unhappily surprised at how much it affected my handling. I was able to overcome the problems with a few adjustments to the shocks (I adjusted my Koni SA's a little bit firmer (rebound)) and going from (heavy) 17x11 ZR1's to (much lighter) 17x9.5 Fikse FM/5's. My ride comfort is now back to where it was before I upgraded the rearend, which is exactly where I wanted it to be.

Maybe this thread will help: https://ls1tech.com/forums/suspension-brakes/697206-unsprung-weight.html

Good luck!


-Mike
Old 07-09-2007, 08:28 AM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (12)
 
sapper_daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Man I've made posts like this before and I don't want to tell you how to spend your money at all. You said you aren't going to do any motor upgrades for what 3-5 years? Are you sure you want to spend that kind of cash on a 12 bolt or 9"? That rear is good for some power PLUS if you want to get to 550 HP you are going to have a hard time getting there even with all bolt ons because those setups rob some power. My thing is if you are staying on the street you have some bigger fish to fry.....just my opinion, take it with a grain of salt.
Old 07-09-2007, 11:01 AM
  #20  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Shock Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just want something that'll perform much better than stock at the slalom and something that I can't brake. I've heard of guys braking their 10 bolts with stock power and I'm stupid enough to do it. I just want to get something that won't brake. I also want it to handle really well. My big question on this post is "how do I get the 9" to feel like a 10 bolt with Koni's?"


Quick Reply: Unsprung Weight Management



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 AM.