2011 5.0 Mustangs....
11-11-2010, 01:27 PM
#41
I love the LSX platform. It would be a very tough decision for me if I were to go out pony car shopping tomorrow. 11 Mustang vs. 11 Camaro SS
Both are relatively even in stock performance. Exterior styling is a tossup. I give Ford the slight edge in interior styling and a slightly bigger edge in available options for the money. Camaro wins in the “muscle car” feel category because we all know the LS motors sound like absolute beasts with an aftermarket cam.
For me, it would come down to “do I want a nice choppy idling h/c SS?”, or “do I want a roots blower powered 5.0 with that classic 2-chamber Flowmaster Mustang exhaust note?”. Like I said, it would be a very tough decision.
Or…do I go with a ever so gently used 2008 LS3 powered C6 Z51 equipped Corvette?…or maybe a Silver or Black 97-99 Viper GTS?...or maybe a fully built mint Stage II 9 second 1987 Buick Grand National?...hmmm
11-11-2010, 01:33 PM
#42
It's kind of hard to compare a $65k-$75k CTS-V to a $35K GT Mustang though.
The 4-door V is a great looking and performing car. I think the coupe looks like Betty the drive-thru manager of the local Wells Fargo would drive it to the post office and to pick up her presciption at CVS.
11-11-2010, 01:41 PM
#43
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm really not bashing GM. It happened. I pointed it out.
I love the LSX platform. It would be a very tough decision for me if I were to go out pony car shopping tomorrow. 11 Mustang vs. 11 Camaro SS
Both are relatively even in stock performance. Exterior styling is a tossup. I give Ford the slight edge in interior styling and a slightly bigger edge in available options for the money. Camaro wins in the “muscle car” feel category because we all know the LS motors sound like absolute beasts with an aftermarket cam.
For me, it would come down to “do I want a nice choppy idling h/c SS?”, or “do I want a roots blower powered 5.0 with that classic 2-chamber Flowmaster Mustang exhaust note?”. Like I said, it would be a very tough decision.
Or…do I go with a ever so gently used 2008 LS3 powered C6 Z51 equipped Corvette?…or maybe a Silver or Black 97-99 Viper GTS?...or maybe a fully built mint Stage II 9 second 1987 Buick Grand National?...hmmm
I love the LSX platform. It would be a very tough decision for me if I were to go out pony car shopping tomorrow. 11 Mustang vs. 11 Camaro SS
Both are relatively even in stock performance. Exterior styling is a tossup. I give Ford the slight edge in interior styling and a slightly bigger edge in available options for the money. Camaro wins in the “muscle car” feel category because we all know the LS motors sound like absolute beasts with an aftermarket cam.
For me, it would come down to “do I want a nice choppy idling h/c SS?”, or “do I want a roots blower powered 5.0 with that classic 2-chamber Flowmaster Mustang exhaust note?”. Like I said, it would be a very tough decision.
Or…do I go with a ever so gently used 2008 LS3 powered C6 Z51 equipped Corvette?…or maybe a Silver or Black 97-99 Viper GTS?...or maybe a fully built mint Stage II 9 second 1987 Buick Grand National?...hmmm
11-11-2010, 01:41 PM
#45
I think its funny tho because now GM lsx cars are coming boosted from factory and Ford is going N/A. Owell, GM is still holding it down on all the other fields.
11-11-2010, 01:53 PM
#46
I got that original message and had a response to it, but nobody seemed to pay any attention to it. I guess it made too much sense.
Why would Ford do any drastic horsepower changes (pour money into R&D) all those years if they were winning the sales battle?
They started losing the sales battle last year when the 2010 Camaro hit the streets. Look what happened. Ford went with a higher HP engine in the GT Mustang. They finally had a reason/need to up the power.
Why would Ford do any drastic horsepower changes (pour money into R&D) all those years if they were winning the sales battle?
They started losing the sales battle last year when the 2010 Camaro hit the streets. Look what happened. Ford went with a higher HP engine in the GT Mustang. They finally had a reason/need to up the power.
11-11-2010, 01:55 PM
#47
11 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
11-11-2010, 01:57 PM
#48
Teching In
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: La Porte, TX
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now your going to a different ball game.
comparing science and physics to business?
Honestly. Maybe I'm the only dum **** out there to triple major Business engineering mechanics and electrical eng.
But if you want to talk about business methods and policies
MAKE ANOTHER THREAD ABOUT THAT!
And don't jump around like a catfish in low water about it
Going from one idea to another.
And ross. I do want to keep it clean here
And i don't want to make enemies especially over a forum
This will be the last time i post in this thread.
comparing science and physics to business?
Honestly. Maybe I'm the only dum **** out there to triple major Business engineering mechanics and electrical eng.
But if you want to talk about business methods and policies
MAKE ANOTHER THREAD ABOUT THAT!
And don't jump around like a catfish in low water about it
Going from one idea to another.
And ross. I do want to keep it clean here
And i don't want to make enemies especially over a forum
This will be the last time i post in this thread.
Oh and business decides what is engineered...
To keep things on topic, to each his own...
Plus it's a drivers race between the cars and the best styling is just a matter of taste.
11-11-2010, 01:57 PM
#49
I'd like to see Ford put out an updated version of the GT with a Whipple powered 5.4 putting out about 750hp to compete with the ZR1, and European exotics. They already offer the supercharger upgrade for the GT500.
http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts...KeyField=12300
http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts...KeyField=12300
11-11-2010, 02:02 PM
#52
11 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got that original message and had a response to it, but nobody seemed to pay any attention to it. I guess it made too much sense.
Why would Ford do any drastic horsepower changes (pour money into R&D) all those years if they were winning the sales battle?
They started losing the sales battle last year when the 2010 Camaro hit the streets. Look what happened. Ford went with a higher HP engine in the GT Mustang. They finally had a reason/need to up the power.
Why would Ford do any drastic horsepower changes (pour money into R&D) all those years if they were winning the sales battle?
They started losing the sales battle last year when the 2010 Camaro hit the streets. Look what happened. Ford went with a higher HP engine in the GT Mustang. They finally had a reason/need to up the power.
11-11-2010, 02:03 PM
#53
11 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd like to see Ford put out an updated version of the GT with a Whipple powered 5.4 putting out about 750hp to compete with the ZR1, and European exotics. They already offer the supercharger upgrade for the GT500.
http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts...KeyField=12300
http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts...KeyField=12300
11-11-2010, 02:07 PM
#54
It would be stupid of me to quote any freak HP H/C LS1 numbers. It would make my argument less convincing.
11-11-2010, 02:10 PM
#55
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will have to agree with Ross on 1 thing, from a Business stand point FORD could school GM on a few things or two... both companys are in the car sales business / $ financing $ not the after market performance business.... I'm sure GM loses it *** on alot of things.
But here on Tech we are all chasing the final HP #'s so with that said fck FORD LMAO
But here on Tech we are all chasing the final HP #'s so with that said fck FORD LMAO
11-11-2010, 02:32 PM
#57
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Friendswood, Tx
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
11-11-2010, 02:32 PM
#58
11 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah. When you said GT I assumed the Mustang line up since we were talking about that. Makes sense. Gotcha. Ford GT would be amazing if they brought it back. I want one soo bad.
11-11-2010, 02:35 PM
#59
I've seen h/c ls1 put out anywhere from 400rwhp to up around 480rwhp. I threw 430rwhp because it seemed like a safe number for a smog legal h/c ls1 without a radical cam and with a middle of the road set of ported heads.
It would be stupid of me to quote any freak HP H/C LS1 numbers. It would make my argument less convincing.
It would be stupid of me to quote any freak HP H/C LS1 numbers. It would make my argument less convincing.
We buy our cars because thats what we want period. It's the same stuff on every form. Whats the ponit to this power,dollar per hp. I can argue a point with the best of them. Blower ls cars been making that 550 number you speak of for a long time.
Last edited by SLV_WS6; 11-11-2010 at 02:40 PM.
11-11-2010, 02:40 PM
#60
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Friendswood, Tx
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess that means it is a popular car then. I am not one for a punkstang and never have been, but when the time came to ****** up a GT500 I was all over it. Very pleasant car to drive. Doesn't mean I am a true Mustang fan. Hell When the new GT350 comes out I will have one of those also. A 5.0 with a factory supercharger will be another interesting one to have.
Ross sums it, Ford had bragging rights for 8 years so they didn't have to change anything, but now since the Fart Turd Boxmaro came out they lost sales. Don't think it was a overnight change, Ford has been planning on the return of the 5.0 for many years, they were just waiting for the right time.