I knew it! Mustang Answers...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2010, 09:53 PM
  #41  
Staging Lane
 
nghisus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've owned both Camaros and Mustangs and competition only helps the customers. The LS engines in any form walk all over the 4.6's. I think that should be the comparison. The LT1 should definitely be compared to the 5.0's. The new Coyote V8's in the Mustang GT's are pretty awesome and should be compared to the SS LS3. In terms of which car I would rather have? That's a toss up, they're both really nice cars with the Mustang being the lighter of the two. We could have this debate all day long but in the end, its nice to see Camaro vs. Mustang again.

Let's all try to maintain a tone of civility and have a discussion. Just because thesource likes Mustangs doesn't mean he's not welcome in an LS1 forum. I haven't seen any of his posts on this thread amount to any kind of trolling.

For what its worth, I've seen 5.0's the smoke LT1's and I've seen LT1's that have smoke 5.0's. I saw a 4.6v GT get smoked by an Ls1 z28. And I got smoked in my 01 Camaro SS convertible by some guy driving an 02 Cobra. What's it matter?
Old 12-19-2010, 10:40 PM
  #42  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
ColeGraham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Helendale
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ja1son
except technology.
to a point, yes...but running an N/A to N/A app, you WILL make more power with more cubes...F/I to F/I its the SAME, the bigger the engine the bigger the power.

For example...

TT Viper, 500 cu in (8.4L) making 1500 whp
TT Z06, 427 (7.0L) cu in make 1200 whp

most these i am seen are on pump gas, with fairly low boost setting. when the TT viper gets dial up to race boost i have seen 2000 whp.

my LS2 with more bolt ons, and top end work can make 500 on a moderate tune. with other LS2 platform getting to the 600 and up all motor. with a just an F/I system and a proper blower cam, 525 to 550 is easy. there are some guys that are running damn near 900 rwhp and tq, but they have a 402 LSx with a procharger. my car right now with mild bolts and beat Corba's and GTs. GTs (with bolt ons) by buses, and corbas (minor upgrades) a little closer. newer GTs is a little closer, but the 5.0 Coyote is a strong motor and the Stangs weigh about 300 pounds less then me.


bottom line...there is still no replacement for displacement. and if you cant really see that, then you a deluded "fanboi" that is ignorant to cars...IMO.
Old 12-19-2010, 10:42 PM
  #43  
Staging Lane
 
snake95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nghisus
I've owned both Camaros and Mustangs and competition only helps the customers. The LS engines in any form walk all over the 4.6's. I think that should be the comparison. The LT1 should definitely be compared to the 5.0's. The new Coyote V8's in the Mustang GT's are pretty awesome and should be compared to the SS LS3. In terms of which car I would rather have? That's a toss up, they're both really nice cars with the Mustang being the lighter of the two. We could have this debate all day long but in the end, its nice to see Camaro vs. Mustang again.

Let's all try to maintain a tone of civility and have a discussion. Just because thesource likes Mustangs doesn't mean he's not welcome in an LS1 forum. I haven't seen any of his posts on this thread amount to any kind of trolling.

For what its worth, I've seen 5.0's the smoke LT1's and I've seen LT1's that have smoke 5.0's. I saw a 4.6v GT get smoked by an Ls1 z28. And I got smoked in my 01 Camaro SS convertible by some guy driving an 02 Cobra. What's it matter?
I agree with you, but you didn't see someone in an 02 Cobra smoke someone, because there was no Cobra in 2002, unless you saw one of the 100 special order ones sent to Australia.
Old 12-19-2010, 11:02 PM
  #44  
Staging Lane
 
nghisus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^hahaa^ It was an 00-01, you're right, I forgot they had issues with the T5 exploding and had to wait for the TERMINATOR I'm going to go change the oil in my 83' vette now, peace!
Old 12-19-2010, 11:19 PM
  #45  
Staging Lane
 
snake95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nghisus
^hahaa^ It was an 00-01, you're right, I forgot they had issues with the T5 exploding and had to wait for the TERMINATOR I'm going to go change the oil in my 83' vette now, peace!
Unless it was a Cobra R, it wasn't a 2000 either I promise I'm not trying to be an ***, lol
Old 12-19-2010, 11:23 PM
  #46  
Banned
 
NoTractionZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South Lake Texas (DFW)
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 12-19-2010, 11:41 PM
  #47  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Jake_the_Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well, for what its worth, the only time i've ever lost to a mustang was to an 03ish mach 1, but as it turns out, my car dynod 220/270, at 17:1afr and the fuel pump died later that week. that was in the first 2 weeks i owned the car. since then, i've raced a few 00+ gt's, older 5.0s, and two newer gt's including a shelby gt. have yet to lose, although i ahve yet to come across a termi or a new 5.0. this was all bone stock cept for an intake, muffler, and my fancy *** ls1 style wiper blades
Old 12-20-2010, 12:00 AM
  #48  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
ColeGraham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Helendale
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NoTractionZ06
i think a Mustang girl made that...because was the first year back 2010? haha. so maybe it should be 2003-2009 (even though you could buy the 2010 Camaro at the end or 09...)
Old 12-20-2010, 12:16 AM
  #49  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
5w20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston , Tx
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ColeGraham
i think a Mustang girl made that...because was the first year back 2010? haha. so maybe it should be 2003-2009 (even though you could buy the 2010 Camaro at the end or 09...)
Or you should say 2001, because when the 03 cobra which hit the streets somehwere around apr-may 2002 it was knocking doors down.

This thread is full of funnies with many people having their blinders on.
Old 12-20-2010, 12:25 AM
  #50  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
ColeGraham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Helendale
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

blinder make life a lot easier...haha
Old 12-20-2010, 12:51 AM
  #51  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
kennyxg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

(caps lock is broken) but are ls1 owners that upset over the new 5.0 spanking that fat camaro ***? the car is in the 9's already with a tranny swap with some spray. the new z28 is gonna be 60 thousand ******* dollars and in the 12ves. guess it's mission accomplished for ford, grab a tissue!
Old 12-20-2010, 12:58 AM
  #52  
Teching In
 
Ja1son's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jake_the_Snake
well, for what its worth, the only time i've ever lost to a mustang was to an 03ish mach 1, but as it turns out, my car dynod 220/270, at 17:1afr and the fuel pump died later that week. that was in the first 2 weeks i owned the car. since then, i've raced a few 00+ gt's, older 5.0s, and two newer gt's including a shelby gt. have yet to lose, although i ahve yet to come across a termi or a new 5.0. this was all bone stock cept for an intake, muffler, and my fancy *** ls1 style wiper blades
Old 12-20-2010, 01:04 AM
  #53  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
02sleeperz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: homeless
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Lol....
Old 12-20-2010, 01:07 AM
  #54  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
ColeGraham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Helendale
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

(caps lock is broken) but are ls1 owners that upset over the new 5.0 spanking that fat camaro ***? the car is in the 9's already with a tranny swap with some spray. the new z28 is gonna be 60 thousand ******* dollars and in the 12ves. guess it's mission accomplished for ford, grab a tissue!

FYI...talk no is the new Z28 will cost about 8-10 k more the the 2SS (35k). i think the price will be around 45k, because GM wants to keep in about of the price range the of the Vette.

few specs to be expected LSA, 556hp and 551 tq. 0-60 sime of around 3.7, 1/4 in the low 12s. this is an estimate based of the CTS-V times of 3.9 and 12.5, but the Camaro weigh 300ish pounds less the the V.

there is talks of some having a "Yanko" option. this will get you, for a few extra grand, get you to around 600. this Yanko option will be dealer installed, basically will be a LS9 minus the 9.1 compression and dry sump oil are the big things missing.
Old 12-20-2010, 01:10 AM
  #55  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
d98gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Liberty/Dayton
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ColeGraham
there is talks of some having a "Yanko" option. this will get you, for a few extra grand, get you to around 600. this Yanko option will be dealer installed, basically will be a LS9 minus the 9.1 compression and dry sump oil are the big things missing.
Oh really now? I'd prefer the Yenko version myself
Old 12-20-2010, 01:14 AM
  #56  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
ColeGraham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Helendale
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its just a rumor right now, but so dealer have sold HEAVILY modified SS. but it will be great to see.
Old 12-20-2010, 01:18 AM
  #57  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
kennyxg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by d98gt
Oh really now? I'd prefer the Yenko version myself
bwaahaa! oop's my bad! spell check is your friend.
Old 12-20-2010, 06:56 AM
  #58  
In-Zane Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thesource
The turbo 3.8L stuff was cool and I use to enjoy the Buick vs. Mustang shoot outs but the C4 Vette was far from being fast. A factory 5.0 Mustang with 5 speed would spank its ***. I remember guys running mid 11's back in the early 90's with a very, very limited amount of bolts on available for the 5.0 back then. I don't recall any 3rd gens being that fast in the same era of time. You guys can joke about Mustangs all you want. I get it, its a GM based tech board. Just remember the next time you get beat by a Mustang, a girls car just drug your ***.

Just remember, there were ******** like me that were yanking off the bullshit TPI and installing a carb and intake and smashing stangs. Otherwise, the stangs are light, but i still have not had any give my 89 a run for the money on motor heads up with traction. Seen them dip into the HIGH 11s all motor with more than just external bolt ons.
Old 12-20-2010, 08:29 AM
  #59  
Banned
iTrader: (60)
 
thesource's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adkins - Tx
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nghisus
^hahaa^ It was an 00-01, you're right, I forgot they had issues with the T5 exploding and had to wait for the TERMINATOR I'm going to go change the oil in my 83' vette now, peace!
The T5 was not used behind the V8 since 1995. The 96-early 01 used a T45 and then they switched over to a TR3650. The 03-04 Cobra went to a T56.

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
Just remember, there were ******** like me that were yanking off the bullshit TPI and installing a carb and intake and smashing stangs. Otherwise, the stangs are light, but i still have not had any give my 89 a run for the money on motor heads up with traction. Seen them dip into the HIGH 11s all motor with more than just external bolt ons.
I don't know about smashing a stang with your carbed out f bomb but maybe so. I know here locally, back in the late 90's up to the mid 00's our local track use to run a F body vs. Mustang shoot out and there really was no comparison. You might have a handful of fast F bodys show up and there would be 5 times the amount of fast Mustangs show up. Us Mustang guys would have to run each other to thin out the pack so that there would be an equal number of Mustangs vs. the F boats in the eliminations part of the race. These were street cars not tube chassis or back halved drag cars.

There is a blue Lt1 powered Camaro down here that runs in the mid 10's and its pretty quick. Probably the fastest one I can think of actually. We do have several quick Ls based GM's down here though and most of them are Vettes. The C6 Z06 is a beast even in stock form.

Last edited by thesource; 12-20-2010 at 08:36 AM.
Old 12-20-2010, 08:52 AM
  #60  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
-Ross-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston/Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,828
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Car is faster and has all around better performance than my car did when it was stock...must make fun...must draw up pie chart questioning owner's sexuality...must draw attention away from real world facts.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 AM.