no front license plate law
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Houston/ Kingsville,Tx
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no front license plate law
so what ever happen to it! someone had a post a while back saying they overlooked it and after janurary 1st we wouldnt need to have a front license plate... soooo i got pulled over last night and 1 week ago .. what happen ??
#6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Corpus Christi Texas
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/traffic/...ate-law-011112
that is the story. It wont be written in any traffic code as there is no longer a written law about ANY license plate.
that is the story. It wont be written in any traffic code as there is no longer a written law about ANY license plate.
Trending Topics
#12
Banned
iTrader: (60)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adkins - Tx
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The plate is still suppose to be there but the determined penalty for not having it was not established. Basically it's illegal but nothing will happen to you for not having it on your vehicle.
#13
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
this was discussed on ccstreetscene, supposedly they got it so that u dont need any plates?
http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/traffic/...ate-law-011112
You will get pulled over by a cop regardless, it will give them the ability to pull you over for suspicion as they see fit. Then after you plead your case they will nail you for something else like.. no cats.. or tint to dark.. or expired stickers.. or suspicion of DUI. My advice is to not give them any more reason to pull you over, don't go through what I went through, sometimes its not worth it to try and prove your innocence if you could just prevent it all-together.
I tried that whole no front LP thing, i got pulled over anyways, showed cop it was on front windshield, car was sold without the LP bracket, pleaded the LP law was vague, got a ticket anyways they didn't care. Went to court 3 times to plead my case and it just wasn't worth the time or hassel.. believe me. Yes I would've won, but all the lost wages, gasoline money, attorney fee's just didn't justify the outcome. OH and btw they wanted $300, and in my case it was not a fix it ticket, so even tho I fixed the issue they still wanetd a maximum penalty on me.
http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/traffic/...ate-law-011112
You will get pulled over by a cop regardless, it will give them the ability to pull you over for suspicion as they see fit. Then after you plead your case they will nail you for something else like.. no cats.. or tint to dark.. or expired stickers.. or suspicion of DUI. My advice is to not give them any more reason to pull you over, don't go through what I went through, sometimes its not worth it to try and prove your innocence if you could just prevent it all-together.
I tried that whole no front LP thing, i got pulled over anyways, showed cop it was on front windshield, car was sold without the LP bracket, pleaded the LP law was vague, got a ticket anyways they didn't care. Went to court 3 times to plead my case and it just wasn't worth the time or hassel.. believe me. Yes I would've won, but all the lost wages, gasoline money, attorney fee's just didn't justify the outcome. OH and btw they wanted $300, and in my case it was not a fix it ticket, so even tho I fixed the issue they still wanetd a maximum penalty on me.
#15
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes there is still a penalty. They deleted it from that particular section, but there is still a "catch-all" section that still enables them to fine you for it:
The new bill reads: Sec. 502.471 [502.401]. GENERAL PENALTY. (a) A person commits an offense if the person violates a provision of this chapter and no other penalty is prescribed for the violation.
(b) This section does not apply to a violation of Section 502.003, 502.042, 502.197, or 502.431 [502.282].
(c) Unless otherwise specified, an [An] offense under this section is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $200.
They just moved the section to a different section. And since the section we are talking about is 504.943 this means these penalties may still be assessed for the violation and doesn't change a thing.
The new bill reads: Sec. 502.471 [502.401]. GENERAL PENALTY. (a) A person commits an offense if the person violates a provision of this chapter and no other penalty is prescribed for the violation.
(b) This section does not apply to a violation of Section 502.003, 502.042, 502.197, or 502.431 [502.282].
(c) Unless otherwise specified, an [An] offense under this section is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $200.
They just moved the section to a different section. And since the section we are talking about is 504.943 this means these penalties may still be assessed for the violation and doesn't change a thing.
#16
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to the news article......
"The issue is not whether it is a fine. The issue is whether or not it’s a crime."
"The issue is they’ve taken out that it’s an offense. It’s not an offense. They can’t use it to pull somebody over, which they use it every day all day long."
So if it's not an offense anymore they can not use it as a reason to pull you over and fine you for it.
But as the news story says....
"Officers will likely continue to issue tickets based on the original law and let the courts worry about it."
"The issue is not whether it is a fine. The issue is whether or not it’s a crime."
"The issue is they’ve taken out that it’s an offense. It’s not an offense. They can’t use it to pull somebody over, which they use it every day all day long."
So if it's not an offense anymore they can not use it as a reason to pull you over and fine you for it.
But as the news story says....
"Officers will likely continue to issue tickets based on the original law and let the courts worry about it."
#17
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sec.A504.943.AAOPERATION OF VEHICLE WITHOUT LICENSE PLATE.
(a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a person commits an
offense if the person operates on a public highway, during a
registration period, a motor vehicle that does not display two
license plates that:
(1)AAhave been assigned by the department for the
period; and
(2)AAcomply with department rules regarding the
placement of license plates.
(b)AAA person commits an offense if the person operates on a
public highway during a registration period a road tractor,
motorcycle, trailer, or semitrailer that does not display a license
plate that:
(1)AAhas been assigned by the department for the
period; and
(2)AAcomplies with department rules regarding the
placement of license plates.
(c)AAThis section does not apply to a dealer operating a
vehicle as provided by law.
(d)AAA court may dismiss a charge brought under Subsection
(a)(1) if the defendant:
(1)AAremedies the defect before the defendant ’s first
court appearance; and
(2)AApays an administrative fee not to exceed $10.
Yes it is an offense. Since there is not a punishment assigned in this section it falls under the previous section's penalties. And please not the court "MAY" dismiss. Not has to.
(a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a person commits an
offense if the person operates on a public highway, during a
registration period, a motor vehicle that does not display two
license plates that:
(1)AAhave been assigned by the department for the
period; and
(2)AAcomply with department rules regarding the
placement of license plates.
(b)AAA person commits an offense if the person operates on a
public highway during a registration period a road tractor,
motorcycle, trailer, or semitrailer that does not display a license
plate that:
(1)AAhas been assigned by the department for the
period; and
(2)AAcomplies with department rules regarding the
placement of license plates.
(c)AAThis section does not apply to a dealer operating a
vehicle as provided by law.
(d)AAA court may dismiss a charge brought under Subsection
(a)(1) if the defendant:
(1)AAremedies the defect before the defendant ’s first
court appearance; and
(2)AApays an administrative fee not to exceed $10.
Yes it is an offense. Since there is not a punishment assigned in this section it falls under the previous section's penalties. And please not the court "MAY" dismiss. Not has to.