SSHAWK

iTrader: (14)

http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...2012&time=3:53 PM

Density Altitude: 1296 feet
Relative Density: 96.26 %


It's worse for you..

When getting your DA you got the time from 2:53... You can't get the DA from 30 mins before if the DA's getting worse. You have to go to the time closes to your time but after your time not before.

The DA you picked..

http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...2012&time=2:53 PM

5w20

iTrader: (21)

1.8 60' with a stalled auto on basically slicks is really crappy.

Your power band is not the same as when it was bolt ons only. You need a converter that flashes higher, as that's where you power band has moved to.

edub80

iTrader: (2)

hey mike and Robert..... how is it possible to run better time with say 75% throttle than at WOT?

jgarza54

iTrader: (4)

Data log your car when you go to the track man.. If there is anything going on, in your driving, shifting, converter locking up, etc. it will let you know, and you can correct anything that seems wrong..

SSHAWK

iTrader: (14)

I told him to do that on post#12 .. It will tell him everything..

It helped me a ton when getting my car dialed in.

edub80

iTrader: (2)

Ok I didn't think one Hr on the da would make that big of a difference .... I'm sure that's why my car is a turd lol... maybe in the winter it will run an 11.8 ... well that's if the da is at 0.... oh well... thanks for yall input... been a lot of help... thanks for the tune and all the help gforce...

SSHAWK

iTrader: (14)

He said he would redyno the car ... See when the next time they're going to the track and have them Data log it... If something was wrong it will tell you.
I'm pretty sure they would do this for any customer.

No reason to get shitty about.. I understand it’s your car and you spent a lot of money… But when someone is giving you some idea in which you asked for” if anyone of yall might have an idea” don’t just dismiss them because it’s not what you wanted to hear.

FlashWS6

iTrader: (18)

Winner winner chicken dinner!! Should do a 1.6 at least

G-force is top notch, I was randomly at a track in Dallas one day and Mike happened to be there. He was willing to data log and tune my car on the fly even tho they didnt do the work or owe me anything!

jgarza54

iTrader: (4)

X2 took the words right outta my mouth..

edub80

iTrader: (2)

Oh no I'm not getting shitty lol... I know my converter is not big enough... and I would data log it if I had the software to do it.... like I said... I was just curious of some things I needed to look at... it was just shocking to me to bust off a 12.0 corrected 11.8... just thought I would atleast pick up a tenth instead of running the same et... especially after having a bad TB and a stock fuel pump( now a walbro 255)... but I'm gona address the converter issue soon

SSHAWK

iTrader: (14)

I will put it this way I know with your mods it should be a lot better.. Bigger stall would help a lot.. But with what you have it still should run better… Do you know the weight of your car?? I know you said full weight but would still like to know what yours weighed in at. Also was it full tank of gas half tank …¼ when you ran the car??

When I’m trying to get every bit out of my car I run my car under a ¼ tank lol But that’s just me being OCD lol

As for the Data logging see if G-Force will do this for you.

BT03mach-1

why do you use a corrected time?

edub80

iTrader: (2)

3800ish and a half of tank.... also I used corrected times because everybody asks what ur DA is? I just used it for that purpose...

iI mean.3800 with me in it

SSHAWK

iTrader: (14)

Any reason you still haven’t changed your stock suspension?? Are you trying to see what it will do as is or just haven’t got around to doing it?
That will help you a lot!

Damn that ****’s heavy 3800lbs

Just something to look at..

My car weighs 3340 with me in it... I haven't cut anything out of my car.. Just took stuff off that wasn't needed I still have my seats in the car.

http://www.karlsnet.com/mopar/datatables.shtml

The old adage is that if you remove 100 lbs from your car, you will run the 1/4 mile about 0.1 seconds faster, which corresponds to about 10 hp (100 lbs=10hp=0.1s). This is an okay rule of thumb, but it is not that accurate, so the above data table is the exact calculations for removing weight from a 2850 lbs vehicle (the weight of my Shadow with a 200 lbs person in it). The numbers work within 2% if you go all the way up to 3500 lbs or down to 2200 lbs, so this table is pretty accurate for determining horsepower and 1/4 mile time changes when removing weight.
Please note, I used the 'Approximate 1/4 mile equations' posted in the Formulas section, but I altered the ET equation. I used 6.357 instead of the 5.5 as the weighted constant in the ET formula because I felt it reflects a more conservative scale for weight loss and 1/4 mile times.

edub80

iTrader: (2)

Ive never weighed the car... stock car weight is 3600 and I weigh 230 and I haven't took any weight out of it... its just a guess of 3800ish

1990LSx

iTrader: (9)

needs more vtec.



/thread

SSHAWK

iTrader: (14)

Ok..

Well let us know what you find out from G-force.

lol HAHA!! We don't need anymore of them!! lol

edub80

iTrader: (2)

Lmfao

Midnightnova

iTrader: (1)

FYI i lost two tenths on motor friday night cause of the heat. Started to push the car in the stagging lanes from then on it help out some, but then had traction issues.

gs462

iTrader: (4)

I also dont believe you're that far off, at 117 mph you should be going around 11.50s and thats with a good 1.6 60 ft time. so you're not that far off base.