Nitto NT05
I looked through tire sizes on different tire sites..and a 9.0" can be used with a 11.1" sectional width and a 8.0" with a 10.2" sectional width. All on 17s.
I don't want to gain 20lbs of rotational weight by going to some DD 17x9.5s or bigger, I won't do 18's either because I want to have a 1.80 60' on street tires.
Last edited by camz28arro; Apr 26, 2010 at 12:32 AM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

and one of them launching at the track .....

Best ever!! is what I think , alot cheaper and soft as mtdrs
well i think thats what i got on there now any how.correction they are 335/35r17's
Last edited by LILWS6; Apr 26, 2010 at 09:06 PM.
Other tires I've run on my car (all 275/40R17s): GS-D3s, KDWs, NT555RIIs, Ecsta MXs, NT555s.
Best overall traction (from a handling perspective, I'm not a drag racer, though I do occasionally hit the strip) is a toss up between the GS-D3s and NT05s. The 555RIIs had the best initial traction by far, but after a few months of daily driving, the repeated heat cycling just killed the tire and the traction faded substantially.
Best wet weather traction goes to the GS-D3s closely followed by the NT05s. None of the other tires come close in wet weather traction, and the 555RIIs could get downright scary in anything worse than a damp road. I became very familiar with the telltale feel of hydroplaning the year I drove on those tires.
Treadwear (this is by no means meant to server as a comparison, just the mileage I obtained with all these tires, which occurred under a variety of circumstances and conditions).
RIIs: 8,000 miles (and that's pushing them to almost bare tread)
Ecsta MXs: 12,000 miles.
555s: 12,000 miles.
NT05s: 10,000 miles (some of the hardest driven miles of all the tires I've used though, many early am rips down the Kancamagus Highway)
KDWs: 13,000 miles.
GS-D3s: 16,000 miles (pushing them to almost bare tread as well)
Price: This is what kills the GS-D3s in this comparison. Being some 60-70 bucks more than the NT05s, any slight edge it has in performance is killed by the bang for the buck factor, being roughly 40% more expensive than the NT05s.
To sum it all up, the NT05 will be the first tire I've purchased more than once.
Other tires I've run on my car (all 275/40R17s): GS-D3s, KDWs, NT555RIIs, Ecsta MXs, NT555s.
Best overall traction (from a handling perspective, I'm not a drag racer, though I do occasionally hit the strip) is a toss up between the GS-D3s and NT05s. The 555RIIs had the best initial traction by far, but after a few months of daily driving, the repeated heat cycling just killed the tire and the traction faded substantially.
Best wet weather traction goes to the GS-D3s closely followed by the NT05s. None of the other tires come close in wet weather traction, and the 555RIIs could get downright scary in anything worse than a damp road. I became very familiar with the telltale feel of hydroplaning the year I drove on those tires.
Treadwear (this is by no means meant to server as a comparison, just the mileage I obtained with all these tires, which occurred under a variety of circumstances and conditions).
RIIs: 8,000 miles (and that's pushing them to almost bare tread)
Ecsta MXs: 12,000 miles.
555s: 12,000 miles.
NT05s: 10,000 miles (some of the hardest driven miles of all the tires I've used though, many early am rips down the Kancamagus Highway)
KDWs: 13,000 miles.
GS-D3s: 16,000 miles (pushing them to almost bare tread as well)
Price: This is what kills the GS-D3s in this comparison. Being some 60-70 bucks more than the NT05s, any slight edge it has in performance is killed by the bang for the buck factor, being roughly 40% more expensive than the NT05s.
To sum it all up, the NT05 will be the first tire I've purchased more than once.



