Wheels & Tires Forged | Billet | Cast | Radials | Slicks

(Updated pics 9/9/16) *17/15 Weld rts* LOW PAD!-Stock brakes- 01 Firehawk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2016 | 01:14 AM
  #21  
badfbodyz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 447
Likes: 3
From: tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by BOLO
You're right, it looks to have more lip. And it does look a lot better than the medium pad wheel.
Thanks man. I've always been curious to see how the lows would look. I couldn't be happier

Originally Posted by Ctdtim01
Where did you get them if you don't mind me asking?
Everything came from summit racing. Mounted and balanced the tires free of charge as well.
Old 06-19-2016 | 11:09 AM
  #22  
MMorgan9812's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Mars Hill, North Carolina
Default

So does this mean if a person where to order street size wheel backs like 17" or 18" in low pad they would fit and have a bigger lip also?
Old 06-19-2016 | 04:05 PM
  #23  
Captain Slow's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: FortLauderdale/Orlando
Default

Originally Posted by BMR Sales2
Fitment looks real good so far, can't wait to see them on the NBM car!

Digging the avatar as well



He is referring to the center piece you are showing being set deeper into the barrel of the wheel. Since the pad height it lower, the center can be set deeper into the barrel without changing the offset relation of the mounting pad to the wheel lip
Look at the picture. How is there not LESS "lip" on the low pad in comparison the the medium?
Old 06-19-2016 | 04:32 PM
  #24  
badfbodyz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 447
Likes: 3
From: tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by MMorgan9812
So does this mean if a person where to order street size wheel backs like 17" or 18" in low pad they would fit and have a bigger lip also?
Yes, low pad will always have more lip than medium and high pad if they are in the same width and same backspace.
Originally Posted by Captain Slow
Look at the picture. How is there not LESS "lip" on the low pad in comparison the the medium?
The picture that shows the low/medium/high pad difference isn't a very accurate determination on how much further the low pad sets the dish in. The hub thickness gets thicker and thicker the more you go up in pad height, thus making less room for "lip". The pictures I posted of what I ordered vs the all polished medium pad wheel for comparison purposes shows the difference pretty good. ALSO, notice how my lug nuts come out further, as where the medium pad wheel's lug nuts are fully recessed down into the hole. Basically, if you want to have more dish in the same backspace, go with low pad. I would LOVE to see what these wheels look like in low pad with the 3" narrowed rears that many guys are doing. It already looks deep & killer in medium pad, I could only imagine how deep with low pad. IMO, I think low pad is a must do if you have a stock length rear end if you want any kind of dish. The medium pad in a 7.5" backspace almost makes the face of the wheel look "flat" to me....
Old 06-20-2016 | 12:19 PM
  #25  
BMR Sales2's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,451
Likes: 17
From: Seffner, FL
Default



Yep, looks even better than I hoped for

This is a stock width rear correct? The dish on that wheel is sick. Can't wait to see what this will look like with a 4.5" BS and my narrowed rear
__________________
Glenn ***
Sales Tech
www.bmrsuspension.com
813.986.9302


Find a Quality alignment shop near you!
Old 06-20-2016 | 03:39 PM
  #26  
Photochop's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 4
From: In the garage
Default

Looks fantastic! Thanks for taking a chance and reporting your findings. Do you happen to have the weld wheel part numbers for those exact wheels and the size of the front tires? M&Hs correct?
Old 06-20-2016 | 07:17 PM
  #27  
badfbodyz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 447
Likes: 3
From: tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by BMR Sales2


Yep, looks even better than I hoped for

This is a stock width rear correct? The dish on that wheel is sick. Can't wait to see what this will look like with a 4.5" BS and my narrowed rear
Your going to absolutely love it! People think mine already looks narrowed because of the dish. But its stock width!
Originally Posted by Photochop
Looks fantastic! Thanks for taking a chance and reporting your findings. Do you happen to have the weld wheel part numbers for those exact wheels and the size of the front tires? M&Hs correct?
No problem, I wanted to take the risk, cause it was the only way I wanted these wheels. They are 17x5 with 2.9" backspace, low pad
Rears are 15x10.275 with 7.5" backspace , low pad. Hoosier 275 drag radials in and M&H 185 front drag radial tire. PM me I can find some part numbers
Old 06-20-2016 | 07:26 PM
  #28  
badfbodyz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 447
Likes: 3
From: tennessee
Default

I freakin love it... Gotta call the low pad rts people the badfbodyz mod... Lmao!

Old 06-23-2016 | 01:39 PM
  #29  
ajsSS's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Default

So this will fit a stock length rear end without grinding down the inside of the quarter panel ?! How low is the car? My goal with my ta is the same look just a little bit lower but I want to run a 15x8 not a 15x10. Also does anybody know how much wider a trans am quarter panel is compared to a Camaro ?
Old 06-23-2016 | 05:01 PM
  #30  
BOLO's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 2
From: Mundelein,Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by badfbodyz
I freakin love it... Gotta call the low pad rts people the badfbodyz mod... Lmao!

This car looks like it has a narrowed rearend and looks great!
Old 06-24-2016 | 12:43 AM
  #31  
badfbodyz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 447
Likes: 3
From: tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by ajsSS
So this will fit a stock length rear end without grinding down the inside of the quarter panel ?! How low is the car? My goal with my ta is the same look just a little bit lower but I want to run a 15x8 not a 15x10. Also does anybody know how much wider a trans am quarter panel is compared to a Camaro ?
Yes I am on a stock length rear. It is pretty low, strano springs with the hose mod. My 15x10's have plenty of room
Originally Posted by BOLO
This car looks like it has a narrowed rearend and looks great!
Thanks! That's the look I wanted
Old 07-04-2016 | 06:39 PM
  #32  
bizkit642's Avatar
On The Tree

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Topeka, KS
Default

Ever find the part numbers for the wheels?
Old 07-04-2016 | 09:45 PM
  #33  
lower90xcab's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: lafayette, IN
Default

looks great...I was wondering about the low pads also. I'm looking at running a 17/15 combo on my s10. I have ls1 calipers on the front of my truck and 96 impala ss rear brakes. I might need to rethink everything now. I was already planning low pads on the rear 15x10s, but planning high pads on the 17s for the front. Maybe I can get away with the lows or meds on my setup.
Old 07-04-2016 | 10:50 PM
  #34  
badfbodyz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 447
Likes: 3
From: tennessee
Default

For anybody interested...
Old 07-06-2016 | 10:34 AM
  #35  
bizkit642's Avatar
On The Tree

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Topeka, KS
Default

Thanks, is that a 26 or 28 inch tire?
Old 07-06-2016 | 10:47 PM
  #36  
badfbodyz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 447
Likes: 3
From: tennessee
Default

28" rears
Old 07-09-2016 | 09:40 AM
  #37  
BlkHwk's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 444
Likes: 2
From: MO
Default

I've been looking at welds on their site. Seems often times their options are restricted on what you can get as far as pad height. Prettty frustrating. Firehawk looks amazing!
Old 07-25-2016 | 11:56 PM
  #38  
AW794's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Default

I just tried to build this wheel (rear) on welds website, and I could not. They don't even have a 10.275 option. They have a 10.333 with a low pad but only with the 5x120 bolt pattern
Old 07-26-2016 | 06:24 AM
  #39  
yotaman96's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 277
Likes: 2
From: Portland, TN
Default

Originally Posted by AW794
I just tried to build this wheel (rear) on welds website, and I could not. They don't even have a 10.275 option. They have a 10.333 with a low pad but only with the 5x120 bolt pattern
Googling the part number posted worked.

https://m.summitracing.com/parts/wld-71lb-510b75a
Old 09-08-2016 | 11:16 PM
  #40  
AW794's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Default

Bumping this. I just received my wheels. That part number DOES NOT FIT stock unmodified brakes. I'm going to assume that someone ground down badfbodyz rear calipers before he took ownership of the car. There is absolutely no way these wheels fit stock unmodified calipers in a low pad setup.


Quick Reply: (Updated pics 9/9/16) *17/15 Weld rts* LOW PAD!-Stock brakes- 01 Firehawk



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.