Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Are $$$ heads worth it for a heavy truck, low RPM's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2012, 05:58 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
RezinTexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default Are $$$ heads worth it for a heavy truck, low RPM's?

I tried a search, no answers.

Motor is a iron 383 (3.9" bore). No boost or nitrous planned.

Are expensive aftermarket heads (PRC 227, etc.) overkill for a heavy truck motor that will not see over 6000 rpm?

I want low end power, but would still like good peak power at 6k.

I'm not worried about spending the money if the gains are solid. If not, what is a good alternative?

Thanks!
Old 04-04-2012, 06:15 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I would think you'd want something smaller like a 210-215, and mill the heads a bit to get the compression up.
Old 04-04-2012, 06:34 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

It's never overkill, with the right compression ratio, tune and cam you should see a good bump of low end torque.

Though you can achieve most of that by a cheaper head with some work, the real benefits of those will be more up top.
Old 04-04-2012, 07:29 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
 
99 2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

You bet, I have AFR 210's on my 2500 4x4 and constantly haul payloads around 3000 pounds and not only do I have way better of throttle response but get at least 1.5 mpg better to the gallon.
Old 04-04-2012, 08:14 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
Rlncoalctd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Shreveport LA.
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wow fuel economy gains...that oughta be nice in a 2500 series truck!

Have you considered building a diesel for that truck of yours? Fuel economy, cheap horsepower, and gobs of torque. Cummins 12v swap FTW
Old 04-04-2012, 09:48 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
 
99 2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rlncoalctd
Wow fuel economy gains...that oughta be nice in a 2500 series truck!

Have you considered building a diesel for that truck of yours? Fuel economy, cheap horsepower, and gobs of torque. Cummins 12v swap FTW
No, I like the power to engine weight ratio that this 6.0L has. There is a curvy road that I travel a lot where faster diesel pickups can't keep up with me b/c of their heavy front end not wanting to stay on the road.
Old 04-04-2012, 09:54 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
gectek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you want aftermarket heads, Trick Flow is what I would look at. They will provide everything you want. Set them up with a good cam and you will get some KILLER torque.

Otherwise, a good set of 243s will get you all you would need honestly.
Old 04-04-2012, 10:05 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

I would consider ported stock castings if budget was a concern.
Old 04-05-2012, 12:02 AM
  #9  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (-1)
 
chopperman69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: OKC
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would say AFR 205's (now 210's) on a 383...

I'm doing a similar build for my truck only it will be a 408 with Mamofied AFR 215's.
Old 04-05-2012, 04:19 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

What's the original head? I know on my 5.3 it came with 243's from the factory.
Old 04-05-2012, 05:00 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
RezinTexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Thanks for the replies.

I'm planning a cam and tune by Pat G after I get it running. CR will be 11.3ish.

haha, don't want to mess with diesel. this engine will not be in this truck forever. Maybe a '69 camaro in a few years...

Original heads on the LM7 were 706's. Heads on the LQ4 currently in the truck are 317's.

Not worried about gas mileage.

Budget is not the main concern, however I don't want to spend money needlessly. If a good set of ported 243's (half the price of 227's) will result in only a 5-10hp difference, the 243's are probably the way to go. If the 227's will get me 20+ over the 243's, I'd go with the 227.
Old 04-05-2012, 06:03 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

Look into A.I.s stuff for stock castings. They have some pretty impressive stuff going on over there. Here are some 243s I sent to them.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...-cnc-work.html




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.