TrammelZ28

iTrader: (1)

which one would be better?

96capricemgr

iTrader: (1)

Tunercat IF YOU KNOW HOW TO USE IT or are willing to learn.

infinitebird

iTrader: (11)

well it's not really one or the other. A dynotune would still need to use something like lt1edit or tunercat to actually do the tune.

TrammelZ28

iTrader: (1)

ya i am talking about what would be better in the long run price wise

Rowdy94

iTrader: (13)

It depends if you can learn to properly use a wideband O2 to tune your car. There is a large learning curve associated with tuning your own ****. If you get it dynotuned, it should be a pretty damn good tune, and cheaper that way if you never plan on doing anymore mods.

96capricemgr

iTrader: (1)

Depends on who does the dyno tune, some tuners know what actually works on the track and others shoot for max on dyno numbers, not the same thing. A good tuner can use the dyno to his advantage, but understands the rollers are not the end goal.

jasonisdn

iTrader: (1)

perfectly stated. also a dyno jet and most mustang dynos , are used to tune WOT only. I don't see you riding around at 100% throttle all day long. A wise man told me to look for either a Dyna pack dyno or a mustang dyno with a eddy brake. Makes tuning faster and easier. i would go with tuner cat and a dual wideband setup. good luck to ya

BlackScreaminMachine

iTrader: (17)

Exp of the user is a key ingrediant here which seems to me you do not have, and unless you pay someone to do ti for your, your not really saving. In my case I bought Tuner CATS which btw is really cheap compared to EDIT and I paid the normal per hour of dyno time, you need a dyno (with apprioriate sensors such as FP, and A/F) to verify results