LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

500 rwhp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2008, 03:59 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ElkySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts

Default 500 rwhp

Could this be attainable with a 383 w/ LE3 package and a bump in compression to 11.5? i also want to run nitrous but i want to make it all motor
ElkySS is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 04:09 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (76)
 
94'BLKBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

no,maybe a solid roller 383
94'BLKBRD is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 04:56 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
chavez885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

why???
chavez885 is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 04:58 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ElkySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

do you think it would get me close? the le3 is supposed to net 410 to 430 rwhp with the stock compression and cubic inches
ElkySS is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 05:24 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Guys have attained the number you seek but to my knowledge nobody has come close with the parts you are considering.

A built motor will make more power than a stock shortblock IF it is done well, but displacement is NOT how it happens. You seem to be under the impression that adding 33cubic inches will have some big impact on output, it wont.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 06:02 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
1SLO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Covina
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

good answer 96... it is all in the package.. it is a little harder to get amazing numbers with an Lt1 because of the head and intake.... now i know it is possible but look at spending at least 10K... or go with a 18 degree head.... sheet metal fab'd inatke and good cam.... and u will be there...
1SLO6 is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 06:12 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

I can think of a couple making this kind of power with stock castings heads and intake, no welding, just not the ones the OP was asking about. Couple of the cars I am thinking of even made 480-520 through automatics with non-lockup converters both 383s, another one is a little 355 M6.

All three of these are using Advanced Induction's 200cc ported stock casting and ported stock intakes. Two of them run 10.8 one runs 9.8, one of the 10.8 cars is a 3855lbs Impala. The engine that runs 9.8 runs well on 93 octane but found pump gas to be too inconsistent for bracket racing at that level. The 10.8 355 is pump gas and I am not sure what the Impala runs for fuel, awesome sight to see it wheels up, as in BOTH over a foot off the ground.

Easiest way to try and get your goal will be to copy those who have done it before you.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 07:02 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ElkySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

i just want to try to make 500rwhp N/A and streetable, meaning on pump gas. anyone think this is do-able
ElkySS is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 07:24 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
CamaroRacing12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Haverhill, Mass
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

doable? yes extremley difficult? hell yes! i wouldnt worry so much on dyno numbers but more on track times
CamaroRacing12 is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 07:25 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Yes it is BUT it is not a small task.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/lt1-lt4-modifications/862777-10-s-w-ai-355-pump-gas-video.html

In post number 35 he links to the dyno charts.
499.52rwhp SAE 513rwhp STD Different correction factors.

This is revving to near the limits of the stock computer, I think going to say a 383 would allow you to make this same power at a little lower rpm. If you look it is 330tq SAE at 2500rpms so it makes really nice lowend too.

A good tuner is what it takes to make serious power drive well.

Spend a couple bucks on a lighter crank, maybe some shaft mounts and the numbers will only go up, maybe not a huge amount but by the time you do a girdle on stud mounts shafts are little more cost.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 07:42 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

$$$$

You're talking 383+ cid, 12/1 compression, AFR220's or larger, solid roller cam 250++ duration and .650+ lift, single plane intake conversion, 1 3/4" headers, etc. . . And even still will take alot of care and tuning to get there. 500 rwhp NA is no easy feat.

Mike
engineermike is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 08:07 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
$$$$

You're talking 383+ cid, 12/1 compression, AFR220's or larger, solid roller cam 250++ duration and .650+ lift, single plane intake conversion, 1 3/4" headers, etc. . . And even still will take alot of care and tuning to get there. 500 rwhp NA is no easy feat.

Mike
My last post is proof you are wrong on the heads, manifold duration, maybe even lift.

IMO the recipe you propose is the exact mistake guys make and why this is achieved so rarely. Guys assume they need huge wild parts and blindly throw money at the goal when finesse is the key.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 08:25 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
My last post is proof you are wrong on the heads, manifold duration, maybe even lift.

IMO the recipe you propose is the exact mistake guys make and why this is achieved so rarely. Guys assume they need huge wild parts and blindly throw money at the goal when finesse is the key.
You have to admit that there are dozens of folks out there with very similar combinations to "that guy" but are making ~440 rwhp, which is about what I would expect. Also, it's interesting when you calculate his hp from the weight and mph, it only comes up to about 513 fwhp, which should be around 440 rwhp assuming 15% drivetrain loss.

Aaaanywaaaay. . . for comparison:

Mike H had Thunder build him a stout LT1. Going from memory, it was 396 cid, AFR 220 Competition ported (300 cfm), 12/1, solid roller 256 .660", and a single plane intake. It made 485 rwhp at 6800 rpm.

Craig M had a local dirt-track shop built him an SBC for a 3rd gen. It was 441 cid, Dart 230 cc heads ported to ~320 cfm, 12.5/1, solid roller around 270, and a single plane intake. It made ~540 rwhp.

Mike
engineermike is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 08:34 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

What did the LT1 run???

The OP asked about hitting a dyno goal, dyno goals are NOT the same as track goals which is a point that should be made. Lots of high dynoing cars out there that do not run and it is NOT just chassis, chassis certainly is a piece of ET but less so MPH.

If that is only 440rwhp then why are we seeing the ET/MPH results he has. Afterall there are a lot of cars out there in the 400-440rwhp range and they don't run like that??
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 08:42 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
If that is only 440rwhp then why are we seeing the ET/MPH results he has. Afterall there are a lot of cars out there in the 400-440rwhp range and they don't run like that??
Weight.
engineermike is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 09:04 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
indirocz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: College Station,TX/Indy,IN
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Talk to the guys at www.tpis.com or ask for Ron at www.prodynotech.com Pry dyno Tech the number for PDT is 765-225-1718, Back in the day Ron Bilyeu and TPIS built a hell of a bad *** vette ( found in the TPIS tips & hits book - the red & silver C4 vette).. Call and a lady will answer, she is pretty knowlegable too.. His current project is his C5 with an LS7 making 550rwhp...

Tell them Jeff with the maroon camaro told you to call.. It doesnt hurt to call and ask questions...
indirocz28 is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 09:33 PM
  #17  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ElkySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

ok lets say i wanted the same setup but wans to stay with the stock or slightly lower compresstion and run a procharger later.
ElkySS is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 09:50 PM
  #18  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

It will be a lot easier to reach your goal if you switch over to an LSx based setup.
speed_demon24 is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 10:25 PM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (129)
 
fergymoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 2,810
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

LSX is always the answer
fergymoto is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 10:32 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
 
SS Aleks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
IMO the recipe you propose is the exact mistake guys make and why this is achieved so rarely. Guys assume they need huge wild parts and blindly throw money at the goal when finesse is the key.
...and that's the game.

Originally Posted by speed_demon24
It will be a lot easier to reach your goal if you switch over to an LSx based setup.
Deamon, that was probably the perfect post.

I made 500 RWHP with ported stock castings. Check out this very short video of one of my dyno pulls.

The best advise I have for you is to buy an engine from a company that has documented results that match your expectations.
SS Aleks is offline  


Quick Reply: 500 rwhp



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.