102/102 stock motor automatic + more inside results inside !!!!
#1
I write checks with my mouth that my ass can't cash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Went to tony mamo ported 102/102 from ls6
Went to ARH 1 7/8 headers from 1 3/4 hookers
Electric waterpump race version and power steering and AC belt delete
Dragbrakes in back and lightweight wheels
You guys Ready for this !!! Grantit it was 4 degreese cooler this dyno than my last!!!
I gained 7 horsepower and 3ft. lbs of torque !!!!
Went to ARH 1 7/8 headers from 1 3/4 hookers
Electric waterpump race version and power steering and AC belt delete
Dragbrakes in back and lightweight wheels
You guys Ready for this !!! Grantit it was 4 degreese cooler this dyno than my last!!!
I gained 7 horsepower and 3ft. lbs of torque !!!!
Last edited by 01ssreda4; 07-27-2011 at 11:08 PM.
#4
Banned
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Went to tony mamo ported 102/102 from ls6
Went to ARH 1 7/8 headers from 1 3/4 hookers
Electric waterpump race version and power steering and AC belt delete
Dragbrakes in back and lightweight wheels
You guys Ready for this !!! Grantit it was 4 degreese cooler this dyno than my last!!!
I gained 7 horsepower and 3ft. lbs of torque !!!!
Went to ARH 1 7/8 headers from 1 3/4 hookers
Electric waterpump race version and power steering and AC belt delete
Dragbrakes in back and lightweight wheels
You guys Ready for this !!! Grantit it was 4 degreese cooler this dyno than my last!!!
I gained 7 horsepower and 3ft. lbs of torque !!!!
A ported 102/102 and 1 7/8" LT's on a stock motor.......and no cam, heads and tune to go with it.......thats some funny ****.
.
#6
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
about what I would expect...If you gained more than 15rwhp I would have been shocked...stock heads/cam choke you out
I only gained 8-10 rwhp up top with my maxed out heads cam setup when I switched to 1 7/8 headers a better flow master mandrel bend y pipe and ewp...so I woud imagine you would gain much much less on a stock heads cam car...also know of a few people that gained nothing on a SI car swapping to a fast 92 vs ls6 intake...
I only gained 8-10 rwhp up top with my maxed out heads cam setup when I switched to 1 7/8 headers a better flow master mandrel bend y pipe and ewp...so I woud imagine you would gain much much less on a stock heads cam car...also know of a few people that gained nothing on a SI car swapping to a fast 92 vs ls6 intake...
#7
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chesterfield,Va
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The FAST 102 intakes are garbage anyway. I only gained 4rwhp with a FAST 102 on my G8 that has cam, headwork, and full bolt-ons. Granted Tony Mamo does awesome work but he cant make miracles happen. Your car was not limited by intake flow. The LS6 intake flows plenty for a stock motor.
Trending Topics
#8
I write checks with my mouth that my ass can't cash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yeah i was told 14-18 RWHP thru my auto i could expect...then i bought it and that number was changed to 10 RWHP i was told to expect...well i got 7 horsepower with the EWP and other things lmfao...dont listen to salesmen is the moral of this story
#13
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The FAST 102 intakes are garbage anyway. I only gained 4rwhp with a FAST 102 on my G8 that has cam, headwork, and full bolt-ons. Granted Tony Mamo does awesome work but he cant make miracles happen. Your car was not limited by intake flow. The LS6 intake flows plenty for a stock motor.
#14
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
^ The're a re-worked 92. It's basically an ITB intake with a common plenum. Not worth the $$$ on a stock engine. I gained 12hp over my LS6 intake and ~25lb/ft tq. I know my SLP LT's must be choking back around 20hp too. It depends on the setup, the port-match, weather, the TUNER, and a LOT of other variables.
Do your research on the 102 and you will see why they put so much R&D into it. It is a performer, but again, not worth the expense on a stock engine.
And ****, get that damn thing tuned right. I gained ~12/18 just from LT.s/
Do your research on the 102 and you will see why they put so much R&D into it. It is a performer, but again, not worth the expense on a stock engine.
And ****, get that damn thing tuned right. I gained ~12/18 just from LT.s/
#17
I write checks with my mouth that my ass can't cash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
^^what he said, all you guys suck it lol...its alright the car still feels like a frekin rocket ship after the last set of mods/weight reduction and suspension...ask my ten bolt it has to be taken apart and re-setup with a solid spacer because i did a few digs and 20 punches and smashed the crush sleve
#19
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Since when did dyno numbers mean so much. You could do 3 back to back pulls and see that fluctuation. If it's the car I'm thinking it is. It should run pretty well, I'd assume well into the 11s at this point.