Fuddle converter
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Marlboro, NJ
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fuddle converter
was thinking about getting the fuddle performance series converter with a 36000 for $450. does anyone kno anything about these and would that match well with my mods?
#2
TECH Fanatic
I have a fuddle, [see sig] and while it has been great for me I have been hearing that as a business fuddle has been somewhat unstable recently.
For that reason alone you may be better off with yank, vigilante or maybe tci.
Your choice of a 3600 stall sound's about right.
What kind of teeth do ya have in the ol' pumpkin? 2.73's or 3.23's?
For that reason alone you may be better off with yank, vigilante or maybe tci.
Your choice of a 3600 stall sound's about right.
What kind of teeth do ya have in the ol' pumpkin? 2.73's or 3.23's?
#4
TECH Fanatic
Originally Posted by 99 Predator
3.23's. i was really looking into yanks but 450 compared to 675 is a big difference
Be carefull.
#5
Tech Resident
Originally Posted by 99 Predator
3.23's. i was really looking into yanks but 450 compared to 675 is a big difference
Trending Topics
#8
I was thinking about getting the $600 dollar Fuddle Racing converter with a 3500 stall on my car, with 4.10's. I want a good quality converter, but I'm not sure which company to go with now as Fuddle was dropped from the sponsors list.
I've seen some people acknowledging they've found out who sells the converters to John at Fuddle, and bought from him directly with better customer service.
I've seen some people acknowledging they've found out who sells the converters to John at Fuddle, and bought from him directly with better customer service.
#9
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,604
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
the quality difference between yank and fuddle is also a big difference. yank's are vastly more efficient so they'll perform much better up top and put down more power to the wheels, they're tighter so they won't feel as soggy around town, their lockup clutches are a helluva lot stronger, their customer service is probably #1 and you know they'll be there tomorrow unlike fuddle. it's a totally different converter. one is quality and performance, the other is budget.
in there for "vast", Bunkie.
"Vast" would be yer love of hyperbole.
#10
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The beautiful Kingdom of Bahrain
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
the quality difference between yank and fuddle is also a big difference. yank's are vastly more efficient so they'll perform much better up top and put down more power to the wheels, they're tighter so they won't feel as soggy around town, their lockup clutches are a helluva lot stronger, their customer service is probably #1 and you know they'll be there tomorrow unlike fuddle. it's a totally different converter. one is quality and performance, the other is budget.
#11
Tech Resident
take it with a grain of salt, it's mostly my fanboy-ness to yank's great track record against my disgust with fuddle's, so maybe it's an exaggeration, but yank is definitely superior to fuddle in all areas, be it efficiency, lock-up, build quality, power to the ground, etc...
#14
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
take it with a grain of salt, it's mostly my fanboy-ness to yank's great track record against my disgust with fuddle's, so maybe it's an exaggeration, but yank is definitely superior to fuddle in all areas, be it efficiency, lock-up, build quality, power to the ground, etc...
#15
11 Second Club
Yank > Fuddle
BUT
I have been hearing about TCI's new Maxeffort converters. They are supposed to have a better effiency then the older TCI converters. And they are still around $500.
Since your concerned about price this may just be what you are looking for:
http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=672&catid=60
or
http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=673&catid=60
I like the 3700
But the 3200 is probably a little more street friendly.
But I still like the 3700
BUT
I have been hearing about TCI's new Maxeffort converters. They are supposed to have a better effiency then the older TCI converters. And they are still around $500.
Since your concerned about price this may just be what you are looking for:
http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=672&catid=60
or
http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=673&catid=60
I like the 3700
But the 3200 is probably a little more street friendly.
But I still like the 3700
#18
Tech Resident
Originally Posted by Azrael
So in otherwords your basically admitting to being "full of the stuff coming out the south end of a northbound bull" because you run a Yank...
#19
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Camaroholic
I cannot believe folks are still considering Fuddle converters.
#20
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
i run a stock torque converter. i've been around long enough to know the track records of both. yank and vigilante, specifically, have impeccible track records, and on this board, yank provides excellent service so i imagine their CS is good if problems ever occur. i never hear bad things about either company. i hear tons of bad about fuddle. i've seen comparison dyno charts of power and yank nets more than fuddle. i've heard people complain repeatedly of fuddle's lockup clutch slipping. you don't get that with yank and vig. i'm speaking the truth, maybe a little exaggerated, but still the truth.