Could this mean a Victor Jr. VS. Performer RPM track test?
#7
The spacer test is up first. Then, perhaps when it cools down we can do the intake. I don't know about back to back swap at the track. I am not fond of wrenching on a hot motor. However, my car is crazy consistent. It runs mid to high 7.40s every trip so far at about 92 to 92.5 MPH. So, the differences in intake manifold performance will be pretty obvious.
Trending Topics
#14
#16
I am gonna install the intake, jet it til' it runs the fastest and compare it to my old times and D/A. After that, I will decide if I leave the Victor on or put the Performer back on.
I know it will 60' slower and probably MPH better. How much of each remains to be seen.
#17
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sparta, Mo. in southwest Missouri
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I think you are confusing me with a scientist or an Edelbrock employee.
I am gonna install the intake, jet it til' it runs the fastest and compare it to my old times and D/A. After that, I will decide if I leave the Victor on or put the Performer back on.
I know it will 60' slower and probably MPH better. How much of each remains to be seen.
I am gonna install the intake, jet it til' it runs the fastest and compare it to my old times and D/A. After that, I will decide if I leave the Victor on or put the Performer back on.
I know it will 60' slower and probably MPH better. How much of each remains to be seen.
Ron
#18
If you can get hold of one...would very much like to see a 1" open spacer on the RPM intake. Old Hot Rod magazine dyno tests showed very good results on this intake. Don't know what RPM you are crossing the line at?...guessing 4600-4800RPM. At 3700 LBS race weight...I predict quicker and faster with the Edelbrock RPM.
Ron
Ron
#19
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sparta, Mo. in southwest Missouri
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Ron