Smoothed Truck Intakes
#241
I am struggling with how much to shave on mine (wire harness guides are already gone). Part of me wants to shave everything/relocate ports to the rear...but then I have to do something with the ugly fuel rails and crossover. Yours looks like how the factory SHOULD have done it.
#243
It is welded. but not sanded smooth. I need to take it over to dad's house for that.
IMG_7129 by Flipper_1938, on Flickr
What did you do about the EGR hole and the purge solenoid hole? Did you weld those up too?
IMG_7129 by Flipper_1938, on Flickr
What did you do about the EGR hole and the purge solenoid hole? Did you weld those up too?
#244
Staging Lane
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I haven't seen any nnbs/tbss intakes done up so I thought I'd do mine and share the progress
left some of the ribs for structure
3m panel bond
roughed it out and decided to remove pcv and relocate map ports
used the evap port for the map, throttle body bracket will hold it in place
another coat of panel bond
That's all for now until more progress.
left some of the ribs for structure
3m panel bond
roughed it out and decided to remove pcv and relocate map ports
used the evap port for the map, throttle body bracket will hold it in place
another coat of panel bond
That's all for now until more progress.
#245
I haven't seen any nnbs/tbss intakes done up so I thought I'd do mine and share the progress
left some of the ribs for structure
3m panel bond
roughed it out and decided to remove pcv and relocate map ports
used the evap port for the map, throttle body bracket will hold it in place
another coat of panel bond
That's all for now until more progress.
left some of the ribs for structure
3m panel bond
roughed it out and decided to remove pcv and relocate map ports
used the evap port for the map, throttle body bracket will hold it in place
another coat of panel bond
That's all for now until more progress.
#246
Staging Lane
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#254
Here are some videos of some of the abuse that I put it through.
Big burnout video:
Big Smokey Burnout '87 Chevy Truck 5.3 Power - YouTube
Lots of WOT pulls:
5.3 Swap '87 Chevy Truck WOT Pulls + Locker Rear - LS1 LSx C10 R10 - YouTube
Big burnout video:
Big Smokey Burnout '87 Chevy Truck 5.3 Power - YouTube
Lots of WOT pulls:
5.3 Swap '87 Chevy Truck WOT Pulls + Locker Rear - LS1 LSx C10 R10 - YouTube
What exhaust are you running??
#257
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Huntsville, Alabama - SA, TX is home
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
They say that their is. I'm not sure that I'm convinced yet.
I see that their could be potential for more air flow with it's larger TB but if the air flow isn't needed for the particular engine, then their'd be no power gains.
People have made plenty of power with a 78mm TB. Guess it all depends on your engines power goals.
I see that their could be potential for more air flow with it's larger TB but if the air flow isn't needed for the particular engine, then their'd be no power gains.
People have made plenty of power with a 78mm TB. Guess it all depends on your engines power goals.
#258
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not sure this would actually be testable. Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't gen3's cathedral port heads and gen4's rectangular port? So the two intakes wouldn't even be matched up correctly to the head if you wanted to do a back to back test.
#260
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Huntsville, Alabama - SA, TX is home
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I just realized that I've never looked at a truck intake that came with 6.2L L92 heads square port heads yet.