CTS-V oil pan 76-96 b body?????
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Pg, Maryland
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i just ordered a ctsv oil pan for my 94 impala... I already have a S&P modifed f body oil pan dont like it does have baffles and 4qt oil pan... I heard i might have to raise my motor up some to clear the center link idk yet... Oh yea, Im running s&p mounts... im taking my LS1 out i think i spun a bearing or broke a rod bolt not knock one time... droping in a fresh lq9 0 miles
#2
TECH Fanatic
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The CTS-v pan works quite well on my Chevelle and the frames should be quite similar. I did have to raise my my engine some but only for the power steering pulley not pan clearance.
#5
TECH Fanatic
#6
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The A-Body crossmember isn't as wide from front to rear as the B-Body one, that with the slope of the pan may cause issues. Did you ever check for tie rod end distance/interference like I said Harry?
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You be bs-in man. I told you that 3 months ago.....
Well 2 weeks ago lol. There is a 3/4" difference between the depth at the front of the pans, that may cause an issue. That also may be why the BRP mounts are so high.
Well 2 weeks ago lol. There is a 3/4" difference between the depth at the front of the pans, that may cause an issue. That also may be why the BRP mounts are so high.