holschen

iTrader: (1)

yes it seems to be like 500$ and out in october seems like a good pan but no? trans support bolts in the pan

facebook link : http://www.facebook.com/MastMotorspo...d=311272949521

speedtigger

iTrader: (16)

The mast pan is the one I am waiting for.

01ssreda4

iTrader: (96)

Yes, this appears to be the case.

LT1 chevelle

Will a 2004 GTO oil pan fit in my 68 firebird

FrankZ

Time to admit I'm a complete 'tard. I'm in need of a shallower pan than the truck pan I'm currently using (03 Tahoe 5.3L) I found plenty of info in this thread but when i try to use www.car-part.com to locate the correct pan (f-body) the olny options I'm seeing are for a 5.7l or 3.8l motor.

So what year Camaro/firefird am I looking for in order to get the correct pan, tray, dipstick?

Told ya I'm a 'tard.

Beau@SDPC

iTrader: (14)

All the F bodies use the same pan/etc. So any of them with the 5.7 engine. LS1 of course.

FrankZ

And I've been able to find at the local bone yards are LT1 pans.

garys 68

iTrader: (1)

Is that the same as the LH8/H3 oil pan?

EspaceF1Fan

Has anyone used the oil pan from www.retrolsx.com ?

speedtigger

iTrader: (16)

There are 2 posts in this thread about this pan with large pictures and discussion as well as several other threads discussing it if you search. It is the pan made by JZ Motorworks. The knocks on that pan are that the baffling is poor and it is not as low of a profile in the front as the AutoKraft pan and does not clear the tie rods on many a-body conversions. Other than that, I have heard nothing else bad.

firehawk68mcleod

iTrader: (2)

which factor and cheaper after market pans will work in my 68 camaro

scatillac

iTrader: (12)

Attached are pics of the CTS-V pans, the pan on the left is for the 04-07 and the pan on the right is the LSA pan.

The LSA pan has cast-in mounts for the oil cooler, a different the boss for the oil level sender, and the larger thread size for the oil filer. Everything else (dimensions, internal baffling, windage tray, ect.) is the same.

scatillac

iTrader: (12)

It's a good looking pan but I would like to see some dimensions.

Also, the windage tray is abbreviated and correspondingly, the front of the pan looks awfully shallow. I wonder if it would clear a 4" arm with an aftermarket h-beam type rod (Callies/Manley/Carrillo) ?

rsz288

Looks similar to an F Body pan. But.......it appears to have a re-profiled floor at the front. The F Body pan has a rod bolt clearance notch cast in. Looks like the MAST pan has this clearance taken one step further. Though yes it would be nice to hear what MAST has to say about this area.

speedtigger

iTrader: (16)

This is the precise thing that makes it attractive to us a-body guys. It helps with the tie rod clearance issues that so many are reporting.

scatillac

iTrader: (12)

I understand that as I have the same issue with my swap, but for those of us with a longer stroke motor, it would be a moot point if it clears the suspension but won't work on their motor.

rallystyle

iTrader: (1)

got a email from mastmotorsports saying there pan will be $420 and avalable mid nov. alli can say is the sooner the better. they did not have any dimentions for me yet. ii think we need to bug them so they get moving on it fast. or we can get them to post on here some info.

chuckd71

iTrader: (23)

Does anyone know if there is an aftermarket dipstick that will work with the cts-v pan? I don't want to blow $25 on the rigid gm part and run into header clearance issues. Would prefer to go with something flexible if possible.

speedtigger

iTrader: (16)

I have been doing my fair share. Make sure you let them know you are waiting on their facebook page too.

Beau@SDPC

iTrader: (14)

You are wrong on that one.
That is another pic of the hummer pan it appears.
Here is a teaser of it....

and here is the album it is in
http://s637.photobucket.com/albums/u...0CAMARO%20PAN/