Corvette Performance
C5 | Z06 | C6 | ZR1 | C7

435whp/435wtq bolt-on C5Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2012 | 06:01 PM
  #1  
SleepyLSX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default 435whp/435wtq bolt-on C5Z

03' Anniversary Z06, 93 octane, nothing ported, longtubes, vararam w/ powerduct, MSD wires, TR-55 plugs, TB bypass, 26 degrees of timing on a dynojet, 40k mi.

Smoothing: 4

Last edited by SleepyLSX; 04-06-2012 at 06:07 PM.
Old 04-06-2012 | 09:05 PM
  #2  
vetteboy2k's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: Central, NJ
Default

Some strong numbers.
Ours made 396rwhp with a small cam and bolt ons.
Old 04-06-2012 | 09:07 PM
  #3  
3.8redbird's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi Texas
Default

That is rather strong...

Has it been to the track?
Old 04-06-2012 | 09:42 PM
  #4  
skeeters65's Avatar
Launching!

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Default

Rather generous dyno..
Old 04-07-2012 | 10:31 AM
  #5  
wooddaniel's Avatar
12 Second Club

iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Alachua, FL
Default

Something's not right. Usually bolt on Zs are around 380-390. Possible it has a cam?
Old 04-08-2012 | 12:37 AM
  #6  
SleepyLSX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

Sorry I haven't posted, but no, the car doesn't have a cam, I have the dyno vid which I can upload.. But I'm still on the Eagle F1's so I'll have to either borrow a set of radials or buy a set to make a track run. I've beaten a couple h/c/i f-bodies without much trouble, all making around 450+whp.

Here's the sheet, the tuners name is what is blacked out. The video I took of the dyno was actually pretty horrible, it's narrow and doesn't show the entire results screen. I can post a video of the car idling I guess to show that it doesn't have a cam. I dunno.


Last edited by SleepyLSX; 04-08-2012 at 01:27 AM.
Old 04-08-2012 | 03:52 AM
  #7  
Blk98Vert's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 1
Default

Theres just no way, the highest bolt ons Z s are right at 400, and they have better intake and exhaust setups than you do
Old 04-08-2012 | 04:14 AM
  #8  
wooddaniel's Avatar
12 Second Club

iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Alachua, FL
Default

Originally Posted by SleepyLSX
Sorry I haven't posted, but no, the car doesn't have a cam, I have the dyno vid which I can upload.. But I'm still on the Eagle F1's so I'll have to either borrow a set of radials or buy a set to make a track run. I've beaten a couple h/c/i f-bodies without much trouble, all making around 450+whp.

Here's the sheet, the tuners name is what is blacked out. The video I took of the dyno was actually pretty horrible, it's narrow and doesn't show the entire results screen. I can post a video of the car idling I guess to show that it doesn't have a cam. I dunno.

Yeah, something is wrong with the dyno then if you are sure you dont have a cam. You are probably right around 400, the reason you beat the Fbodies is you are around 500lbs lighter
Old 04-08-2012 | 11:16 AM
  #9  
poorhousenext's Avatar
11 Second Club

 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: TN
Default

First thing first.

Was the run done on a Dyno Jet Dyno?

I don't think so.

The OP's dyno sheet doesn't look like any thing I've ever seen produce by Dynojet's Win7 software package. Anytime I dyno a vehicle on a Dynojet, I always ask for a copy of of all the Run files so I can study them by viewing them at home using Dynojet latest Software.

To validate my observation since none of my vehicles have been dyno'ed in a few years, I went to Dynojet's website and downloaded their latest version of WinPep software to my home computer just to see if they had changed it in such a way as to produce a Graph sheet like the OP's.

DynoJet Software want produce a sheet like OP's on either the run viewing software I downloaded or the run/view software used by Shops.

I tend to look things over, an both the OP and others here might want to take note of the correction factor for the run, 1.06, no mention of SAE, STD and with the 1.06 correction factor. It must have been one hell of a bad day to dyno, or one hell of a day for the Operator who I believe used a ctrl X on another brand of Dyno to produce that correction factor by overriding the Dyno's weather station atmospheric observed conditions/readings.

Below is link to Dynojet's web site that will allow you to download their WinPep7 software for viewing your dyno runs. It has every feature shop's software has and you can view run data in many different ways.

http://www.dynojet.com/downloads/software.aspx

Just scroll down the page and click on "Trying to View Your run" and you can download WinPep7 viewing and displaying software.

PS: If the Dyno's operator want give you a copy of your run files, find another dyno. You may even have to tell him about being able to view your run files at home...
Old 04-08-2012 | 12:10 PM
  #10  
wooddaniel's Avatar
12 Second Club

iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Alachua, FL
Default

Originally Posted by poorhousenext
First thing first.

Was the run done on a Dyno Jet Dyno?

I don't think so.

The OP's dyno sheet doesn't look like any thing I've ever seen produce by Dynojet's Win7 software package. Anytime I dyno a vehicle on a Dynojet, I always ask for a copy of of all the Run files so I can study them by viewing them at home using Dynojet latest Software.

To validate my observation since none of my vehicles have been dyno'ed in a few years, I went to Dynojet's website and downloaded their latest version of WinPep software to my home computer just to see if they had changed it in such a way as to produce a Graph sheet like the OP's.

DynoJet Software want produce a sheet like OP's on either the run viewing software I downloaded or the run/view software used by Shops.

I tend to look things over, an both the OP and others here might want to take note of the correction factor for the run, 1.06, no mention of SAE, STD and with the 1.06 correction factor. It must have been one hell of a bad day to dyno, or one hell of a day for the Operator who I believe used a ctrl X on another brand of Dyno to produce that correction factor by overriding the Dyno's weather station atmospheric observed conditions/readings.

Below is link to Dynojet's web site that will allow you to download their WinPep7 software for viewing your dyno runs. It has every feature shop's software has and you can view run data in many different ways.

http://www.dynojet.com/downloads/software.aspx

Just scroll down the page and click on "Trying to View Your run" and you can download WinPep7 viewing and displaying software.

PS: If the Dyno's operator want give you a copy of your run files, find another dyno. You may even have to tell him about being able to view your run files at home...
That is outstanding info, thank you for posting this.
Old 04-08-2012 | 09:00 PM
  #11  
breze84's Avatar
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 815
Likes: 2
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Lol, Sorry to say man but you were just on a generous dyno... I bet if my Z06 was on that dyno I would put numbers pretty close to that... On a dyno that is has been actually calibrated correctly your more in the 385whp range SAE....
Old 04-09-2012 | 08:43 AM
  #12  
pittman's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: Orange Park Fl
Default

Here is a typical post for a C5z...just for reference

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/perf...-398-rwhp.html
Old 04-15-2012 | 11:23 AM
  #13  
Jimbo'sZO6's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Sorry Bro, NFW a bolt-on LS6 is making that much power. Get it to another dyno for some real results. Preferably a Dynojet with an operator who knows his machine. That dynosheet you posted is NOT from any Dynojet that any of us here has ever seen. Not trying to be a hater or anything, but someone is blowing smoke up your ***!

Jimbo
Old 04-15-2012 | 11:05 PM
  #14  
2000ssowner's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: San Jose,Ca
Default

woah that is some high numbers for a bolt-on z.
Old 04-16-2012 | 04:28 PM
  #15  
ysb02's Avatar
Launching!

 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Default

heh funny. Finally found another dyno that gives higher readings than a dynojet (known to be high).
Old 04-17-2012 | 06:01 AM
  #16  
MikeG's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default

That sheet is from a dynocom dyno. Known to produce very high numbers.
Old 04-17-2012 | 06:45 AM
  #17  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,976
Likes: 482
From: Winchester, VA
Default

Sounds a bit high even to me with those bolt-ons. My ls6 has every bolt-on in a fbody and didn't get there. But at 426whp and 405 wtq (dynojet #'s) it did pretty well. Take it to the track op and see if it can back up those numbers.
Old 04-22-2012 | 03:19 PM
  #18  
indirocz28's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
From: College Station,TX/Indy,IN
Default

My Z28 in my sig was done on a Dynocom Dyno... I can attest to them reading "QUITE" high.. The numbers were 431/408...

Last edited by indirocz28; 04-22-2012 at 03:31 PM.
Old 04-22-2012 | 03:28 PM
  #19  
desertLS1's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,277
Likes: 1
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha^^^^^
Old 04-23-2012 | 01:54 AM
  #20  
TransAmcoupe98's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 1
From: Winchester, TN
Default

Not possible...with boltons....no way.


Quick Reply: 435whp/435wtq bolt-on C5Z



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM.