Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

SOLID roller vs HYDROLIC come inside !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2011, 08:38 PM
  #1  
I write checks with my mouth that my ass can't cash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
00blacka4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default SOLID roller vs HYDROLIC come inside !

I have been doing alot of reading about solid roller vs. hydrolic and was wondering the pros cons of solid....it seems like solid makes more power consistantly i read an article where they swapped to a solid setup with similar car and went from 574 horse to 608 on a 408 stroker...

are there really any major downfalls...and do u have to check and adjust often ?

would it be worth the gained power ?
Old 11-11-2011, 07:06 AM
  #2  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Shawn @ VA Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia Beach,Virginia
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

cost is the only downside.

don't let people tell you they have to adjust them all the time. they are either lying, don't actually have a solid roller or have a bunch of junk parts.
Old 11-11-2011, 07:31 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
 
mgonzo82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very good question. I would like to know too.
Old 11-11-2011, 07:40 AM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (129)
 
fergymoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 2,810
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

After having a solid, I couldn't go back to hydraulic. It is good to check the valves every so often so in case there is a problem developing, you can catch it and prevent it (such as roller bearings in a lifter wearing out). They will not need adjusted any drastic amount unless there is a problem.
Old 11-11-2011, 08:06 AM
  #5  
I write checks with my mouth that my ass can't cash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
00blacka4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

shawn ill be givin you a call...the thing is i dont understand why hydrolic is even an option for people maxing out setups...i mean **** we spend 2k on fast intakes that give us 20 horse...why not spend a little more on good lifters and stuff to go solid and get 20 or 25 ? i mean cost vs. power i think it would be just as good or better than a fast intake...
Old 11-11-2011, 08:29 AM
  #6  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
ATVracr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: GB
Posts: 5,297
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Shawn @ VA Speed
cost is the only downside.

don't let people tell you they have to adjust them all the time. they are either lying, don't actually have a solid roller or have a bunch of junk parts.
this !!
Old 11-11-2011, 04:49 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
zracer323's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

http://www.lsxtv.com/tech-stories/en...raulic-roller/
Here's an interesting read on hydraulic vs solid
Old 11-11-2011, 05:59 PM
  #8  
I write checks with my mouth that my ass can't cash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
00blacka4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

man they only gained 8 horsepower in that article...so what would some of you guys say the gains would be on an agressive max effort 347 build?
Old 11-11-2011, 06:18 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,049
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

All I know is when I am done with my 346 and build a stroker it will be solid roller. Solid roller all the way.
Old 11-11-2011, 09:15 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
BOLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mundelein,Illinois
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I run a solid roller in my stock bottom end LT1 believe it or not. And what a improvement it made. I went the best of 11.61@116 from the old h/c set up, sporting a hyd. cam in the 236/236 duration, to an 11.04@122 with a mild solid roller cam. That's whopping 6/10th quicker and a 6 mph faster. No other changes except of course higher pressure valve springs,pushrods and solid roller lifters. I check lash every now and then. I would never go back to hydraulic. When I build my stroker, it will definitely be a solid roller. Check out the vid in my sig.
Old 11-12-2011, 09:40 AM
  #11  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Solid roller once the parts have broken in won't really change a whole lot at all.. the valve springs are something you want to check alot more often just to make sure they stay up to spec, but as long as you put a good enough spring on they should be fine for a while. This is mainly due to the ability, and 99% of the solid roller camshafts being a good bit more agressive (because they can be compared to your street hydraulic stuff)

You get what you pay for with these parts though... don't skimp and try to do it the cheap way, spend the money on good parts the first time and you won't have alot of issues from them.
Old 11-12-2011, 08:25 PM
  #12  
I write checks with my mouth that my ass can't cash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
00blacka4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

would a solid roller really be worth the power gains for the hassle ?
Old 11-13-2011, 06:02 AM
  #13  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (91)
 
MUSTANGBRKR02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Well you said max effort 346, so yes it will be worth the gains.



Quick Reply: SOLID roller vs HYDROLIC come inside !



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 AM.