2011 5.0 Mustang Dyno
03-28-2010, 09:06 PM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2011 5.0 Mustang Dyno http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...ang-gt-50.html
If the car isn’t a ringer the new 5.0 could be pretty fast. Looks like it took 7 dyno pulls before it got to that number but with estimates in 3600Ibs range it could be a mover.
For some reason they don;t want to use the 1:1 gear (5th) for the dynos.
http://wot.motortrend.com/6659607/au...v-6/index.html
If the car isn’t a ringer the new 5.0 could be pretty fast. Looks like it took 7 dyno pulls before it got to that number but with estimates in 3600Ibs range it could be a mover.
For some reason they don;t want to use the 1:1 gear (5th) for the dynos.
http://wot.motortrend.com/6659607/au...v-6/index.html
Last edited by easy_rider; 03-28-2010 at 10:10 PM. Reason: Added Motor Trend Dyno.
03-28-2010, 09:16 PM
#2
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (34)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I call bs on the power numbers the new stangs are only rated at 415ish. with those numbers it would make more like 450ish to the flywheel. I don't doubt its a stout motor but for it to put down more then a more powerful 2010 camaro's motor i think not.
Last edited by headed-ws6; 03-29-2010 at 12:10 AM.
03-29-2010, 06:50 AM
#5
11 Second Club
Motor trend got a 12.8 @110.8, so I believe the power numbers are probably right. Looks like the ponycar war is back on. My guess is that now mustang will again outsell the camaro. I'm sure a whole lot of folks have been waiting for the new stang to come out.
03-29-2010, 07:03 AM
#6
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tomball,TX
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those numbers can't be accurate. The mustang barely loses any power from the flywheel to the real wheels. Also Motor trend only ran the car a tenth faster than the camaro with supposedly more HP and 250 less in weight.
Trending Topics
03-29-2010, 09:19 AM
#8
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^Agreed, has to be seriously underrated at the flywheel, or those numbers are just way too high. However, I'm excited to see Ford step it up finally. Its awesome to see the days of the muscle cars wars being revived with current technology 
03-29-2010, 11:32 AM
#11
No offense to all you loyal GM owners, but in case you forgot, the 98-02 LS1 F-bodies were rated at 305hp from the factory. The funny thing is, they regularly would dyno 300-310rwhp on a chassis dyno. Was the driveline really efficient? No. Was the factory hp rating conservative to keep from competing with the Corvette? Yes.
Give props to Ford for finally making a naturally aspirated engine that makes some killer power. The factory hp rating is obviously conservative (just like the old LS1 F-bodies were). Let the horsepower wars continue!
Give props to Ford for finally making a naturally aspirated engine that makes some killer power. The factory hp rating is obviously conservative (just like the old LS1 F-bodies were). Let the horsepower wars continue!
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
03-29-2010, 04:17 PM
#14
No offense to all you loyal GM owners, but in case you forgot, the 98-02 LS1 F-bodies were rated at 305hp from the factory. The funny thing is, they regularly would dyno 300-310rwhp on a chassis dyno. Was the driveline really efficient? No. Was the factory hp rating conservative to keep from competing with the Corvette? Yes.
Give props to Ford for finally making a naturally aspirated engine that makes some killer power. The factory hp rating is obviously conservative (just like the old LS1 F-bodies were). Let the horsepower wars continue!
Give props to Ford for finally making a naturally aspirated engine that makes some killer power. The factory hp rating is obviously conservative (just like the old LS1 F-bodies were). Let the horsepower wars continue!
Last edited by ScreaminRedZ; 03-29-2010 at 08:20 PM.
03-29-2010, 08:52 PM
#16
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think its pretty tapped, it has mid length headers, and a electric power steering pump stock. So long tube headers and a under drive pulley won't get as much.
I imagine this engine can't be cheap to produce either, but it looks like they designed in the ability to drop a DI system in the next rev. So that should be an easy 20HP in a few years when they need to bump it.
I still prefer the cheap, easy mod gains of the 5.7-6.0-6.2 of the LS series but its cool to see Ford stop pulling punches and bring a gun to a gun fight for once.
I imagine this engine can't be cheap to produce either, but it looks like they designed in the ability to drop a DI system in the next rev. So that should be an easy 20HP in a few years when they need to bump it.
I still prefer the cheap, easy mod gains of the 5.7-6.0-6.2 of the LS series but its cool to see Ford stop pulling punches and bring a gun to a gun fight for once.
03-29-2010, 09:05 PM
#17
03-29-2010, 10:05 PM
#19
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Manhattan NYC
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Motortrend video dyno 400+hp 400+tq and 12.80 1/4 mile on YouTube..throw a tune drag radials and cold air..low mid 12 solid..without breakin due to solid rear axle..not that's going to be a drag car!!
