Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Do K&N filters really produce anything?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2004, 02:34 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
big dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silver Spring, Md.
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Do K&N filters really produce anything?

After finding that the paper filters can be found for $7, is it actually worth spending $60 for the K&N? Has anyone actually picked up power from one of them?
Old 04-03-2004, 04:37 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Scalpel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 7,000
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have heard that the Fram air filters flow just as much as the K&N.
Old 04-03-2004, 05:11 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
big dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silver Spring, Md.
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CANNIBAL
I have heard that the Fram air filters flow just as much as the K&N.
Good, it just so happens that I'm running a fram now.
Old 04-03-2004, 05:28 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
 
Tranzor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The only reason to go with a filter like a K&N is for the reusability... there is no performance gain from them. Even then, you're better off going with a Fram because you can replace one 10 times over before the K&N filter shows any savings money-wise... and by then the K&N is looking pretty haggard.

Bottom line, not worth it.
Old 04-05-2004, 10:40 AM
  #5  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,604
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

They produce an oily crust on your MAF sense elements
if you over-oil it a little. Bonus there.

When I tested paper elements the Purolator was slightly
lower restriction than Fram, but both of these were better
than the OEM paper filter.
Old 04-05-2004, 11:14 AM
  #6  
iTrader: (3)
 
sawedoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am also using the Fram air filter, and I like it. I replaced the OEM unit with the Fram unit, and I did notice a difference in the car. As far as the K&N unit goes, save your money. They are way over priced for an air filter element. You have to buy their cleaner, and then you have to buy their special oil, plus your out the initial dive-in price for the K&N element. By then you could have already bought at least a few years supply of Fram air elements. The philosophy behind them is about what Gillette goes by for replaceable blades for your razor.
Old 04-06-2004, 01:23 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
kickassT/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the difference i noticed was more in my gas mileage than power. that makes it worth it to me.
Old 04-06-2004, 04:06 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
 
niphilli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,695
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Yep, there have been some independent tests that show the FRAM paper filter makes as much power and flows just as well as the K&N. GM has also said in some corvette applications that the oiled filters have caused problems (De-screened applications I think). When I de-screened my MAF I went with a paper filter.
Old 04-09-2004, 09:04 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
 
jruss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kickassT/A
the difference i noticed was more in my gas mileage than power. that makes it worth it to me.
lol it was probably your driving habits many things contribute to gas milage air pressure etc




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 AM.