Patriot stage 2 LQ9 and 226/226
#1
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kingwood, tx
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
2001 camaro ss. Stage2 Lq9 Heads. 226/226 .585/.585 on a 112.
Slp longtubes, Slp y-pipe, Gutted Random cats, Loudmouth, Pulley, Mti air lid, 12bolt with 4.10's, Mti tune, Mti polished throttle body.
The hp seems a bit low to me. What do you guys think? Seems like i could have made this much power with just a cam. I'm thinking of throwing out the Slp junk and replacing it with kooks. Hopefully you can see this dyno chart.
Slp longtubes, Slp y-pipe, Gutted Random cats, Loudmouth, Pulley, Mti air lid, 12bolt with 4.10's, Mti tune, Mti polished throttle body.
The hp seems a bit low to me. What do you guys think? Seems like i could have made this much power with just a cam. I'm thinking of throwing out the Slp junk and replacing it with kooks. Hopefully you can see this dyno chart.
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Your numbers aren't great, but they aren't terrible either. Keep in mind your 12 bolt is eating up some power, so pretend they're 420 if you're comparing to the usual 10 bolt dynos you see. I'd expect that cam to do 385-395 by itself, so a gain of 25-35 rwhp through heads is not bad. I've seen dyno sheets that showed a 10-15rwhp diff by getting rid of SLP headers btw.
#3
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kingwood, tx
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
While I agree the numbers arent horrible, they are just a bit low. I'm just looking for suggestions on how to improve it by about 20 rwhp. If i can be in the 420rwhp range with a 12bolt, i wont complain. I'm going to try kooks headers for one... Any other suggestions? I know its hard to see but does the afr seem ok?
#4
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
retune, your leaning out alot on the top end. like blake said, your gears and 12 bolt are sucking up power as well. your tq curve looks great, if im reading it right you havee 350rwtq @ 2500! also, from what i've seen of PP heads they really need a bigger cam due to the large port volumes and top end flow. mid lifts suffer a bit. what chamber size did you go with and whats your compression.
Last edited by jrp; 01-28-2005 at 10:23 AM.
Trending Topics
#9
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the 2.055" valves are killing you especially with a cam that small.I have lost all hope in patriot since the last set i got looked like it was ported with jagged rocks..the cnc tooling is insane..but yeah try a bigger cam..but with the 2.05 valves your gunna need to flycut for anything worth while.
Carter
Carter
#10
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by leeluther252
any suggestions on a better cam? dont want to fly cut.
#12
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You have a Pulley, A loudmouth..which is almost as good as a cutout, a ported TB, longtube headers with no cats, LS6 intake, and tuning. I did a before and after with my 12 bolt and lost around 10rwhp. Pretty much the only difference between your 409rwhp combo and my 450rwhp combo is the choice in heads.
#13
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by gomer
You have a Pulley, A loudmouth..which is almost as good as a cutout, a ported TB, longtube headers with no cats, LS6 intake, and tuning. I did a before and after with my 12 bolt and lost around 10rwhp. Pretty much the only difference between your 409rwhp combo and my 450rwhp combo is the choice in heads.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
#14
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kingwood, tx
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Im not arguing that I should make 450 rwhp. I did buy budget heads...Not disputing that. They are better than stock though, and i see cam only cars make what i make with close to the same cam specs..
#15
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by leeluther252
Im not arguing that I should make 450 rwhp. I did buy budget heads...Not disputing that. They are better than stock though, and i see cam only cars make what i make with close to the same cam specs..
#20
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mission, TX
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by leeluther252
It was tuned with the tps falling off, and with 1 wire problem.. (THANKS MTI)
And you should fix that TPS....could cost you a little hp if its not getting the right reading...of course Im sure MTI checked to see if it was getting close to a 100% open reading....didnt they?