Highest NA dyno???
01-30-2006, 05:47 PM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Highest NA dyno??? Just curious what the highest Dynojet numbers are these days.
What are the highest LS1/LS6 NA?? What CID and cam?
Graphs would be awesome.
-JJ
What are the highest LS1/LS6 NA?? What CID and cam?
Graphs would be awesome.
-JJ
Last edited by Onyx LS1; 01-30-2006 at 06:00 PM.
01-31-2006, 12:51 PM
#3
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
750ish rwhp by SAM on a 427 inch ls6 headed all out (still wet sump, still ls6 heads though) race motor on race gas. Was through an efficient jericho manual transmission.
01-31-2006, 04:24 PM
#4
8 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: detroit, Mi
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DAPSUPRSLO
750ish rwhp by SAM on a 427 inch ls6 headed all out (still wet sump, still ls6 heads though) race motor on race gas. Was through an efficient jericho manual transmission.
They better check there dyno for accuracy. The #'s they ran at the weight they were at would say they were not that high. Not bashing anyone just telling the truth.
Matt
01-31-2006, 04:37 PM
#5
7 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Grove City Ohio/Port Washington L.I sometimes
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My old 402 nitrous motor with marginal quality C5R heads and a less than spectacular custom intake made 751 flywheel.ARE did the heads and most of the intake.
01-31-2006, 05:15 PM
#6
8 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by matt346ls1
They better check there dyno for accuracy. The #'s they ran at the weight they were at would say they were not that high. Not bashing anyone just telling the truth.
Matt
Matt
02-01-2006, 07:02 AM
#7
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by matt346ls1
They better check there dyno for accuracy. The #'s they ran at the weight they were at would say they were not that high. Not bashing anyone just telling the truth.
Matt
Matt
Vehicle Weight (in pounds): 3300
Vehicle Horsepower: 850
RPM through lights (finish line): 8800 (guess)
Tire Diameter (Hght.) in Inches: 29.5
1/4 Mile ET: 9.08
1/4 Mile Top End Speed: 148.95
Ideal 1/4 Mile Gear Ratio: 5.19
1/8 Mile ET: 5.78
P.S. Dropping the weight to 3200 makes a difference of two mph and less then 1 tenth, just checked it.
http://www.richmondgear.com/112901.html
Trending Topics
02-01-2006, 10:27 AM
#8
8 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: detroit, Mi
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DAPSUPRSLO
Quite possibly, but this is just a sample of some numbers I entered in the calculator Richmond Gears has and it's pretty much right there. RPM doesn't really effect this calculators prediction of et's, only gear selection. I have no idea to the accuracy of this calculator though, nor do I know 100% that that is the actual raceweight of the car, but I know it was over 3000 by a good bit.
Vehicle Weight (in pounds): 3300
Vehicle Horsepower: 850
RPM through lights (finish line): 8800 (guess)
Tire Diameter (Hght.) in Inches: 29.5
1/4 Mile ET: 9.08
1/4 Mile Top End Speed: 148.95
Ideal 1/4 Mile Gear Ratio: 5.19
1/8 Mile ET: 5.78
P.S. Dropping the weight to 3200 makes a difference of two mph and less then 1 tenth, just checked it.
http://www.richmondgear.com/112901.html
Vehicle Weight (in pounds): 3300
Vehicle Horsepower: 850
RPM through lights (finish line): 8800 (guess)
Tire Diameter (Hght.) in Inches: 29.5
1/4 Mile ET: 9.08
1/4 Mile Top End Speed: 148.95
Ideal 1/4 Mile Gear Ratio: 5.19
1/8 Mile ET: 5.78
P.S. Dropping the weight to 3200 makes a difference of two mph and less then 1 tenth, just checked it.
http://www.richmondgear.com/112901.html
Matt
02-01-2006, 10:43 AM
#9
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by matt346ls1
They better check there dyno for accuracy. The #'s they ran at the weight they were at would say they were not that high. Not bashing anyone just telling the truth.
Matt
Matt
02-01-2006, 12:17 PM
#10
8 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: detroit, Mi
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ben R
The dyno is correct. The ET wasn't as low as the MPH showed it should be due to the clutch setup. It was their first time out with all of the new power and the clutch setup was a little off.
02-01-2006, 12:27 PM
#11
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by matt346ls1
A 5.19 gear is a bit steep and I went 9.27 @ 148 with a 4.56 gear at 8000 rpm's with 570 rwhp. Cool little deal though.
Matt
Matt
Matt, how much does your car weight?
02-02-2006, 12:21 PM
#14
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by matt346ls1
When it ran 154 or the next week when it only went 146?
02-02-2006, 03:58 PM
#15
8 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: detroit, Mi
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ben R
If you're trying to say that the school has lied about something, you should just come out and say it. I don't like dancing. Nobody can dispute the car ran 154 MPH. There were a handfull of people out there to witness it, me being one of them.
Matt
