Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Torquer 2, cam only, speed density #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2006, 01:03 PM
  #61  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Billiumss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 2,975
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

It's all about marketing. Infate the numbers a tad and you sell more parts and tuning.

We post on here to share info. So basically if I put my stock heads back on, buy all the same parts that WS6 Kid has and have you SD tune my car, I will make the same power within 5hp and 5tq? I really don't think so. If you didn't live so far from me, I'd have you SD tune my car so I could gain at least 20 more HP and torque.

I worked on and tune a bunch of LS1 cars and see patterns. So a MAF on a cam only car is a big air restriction or did you find some magical table in the PCM?

Yes, some cars are freaks and make more power than others but not 20 more.

If the numbers were like 410HP & 400TQ, I could believe it.
Billiumss is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:05 PM
  #62  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Ryne @ CMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: murrieta
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i know one the car runs, on the street my gto can barely stay at his rear bumper, because of my extra heft, and stereo equipment.
Ryne @ CMS is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:21 PM
  #63  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
954RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Billiumss
It's all about marketing. Infate the numbers a tad and you sell more parts and tuning.
Couldn't have said it better myself. I made 20+ pulls with my car with that same cam but with PRC LS6 heads milled down to give me a ~ 11.2-1 comp ratio. Through the cutout (see sig) my car made a best of 415/387. Yes I did a leakdown and it was perfect.

Tested it back to back with MAF tune and SD tune and the SD tune without the MAF in place yeilded ~5 hp. Same day, within the same hour dyno. I think I have eliminated ALL variables with the MAF vs. SD tune and I do believe MAFless can't be worth any more than 5.

I do belive the shape of his graph because the torque & hp curve is identical to mine but his are just 20 hp & 20 torque higher. Since he has full exhaust and I was running thorough cutouts the numbers would have been even more extreme ~ 30hp& 30 torque higher. So it says one of two things either TSP's heads suck and detuned my car or that dyno or the dyno that I was on are off alot.
954RR is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:24 PM
  #64  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
TroubledWine3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL at people calling bullshit after the dyno graph was posted, tuner confirmed results, and witnesses as well.

We all know there are some 01-02 cars that are stronger than others. For instance, my friend Jeff has a 02 SS, 6 speed, lts, ORY, GMMG catback, lid, ported stock TB, LS6 intake, stock 10 bolt, runs 12.4@115 with a 1.9 60ft, 368rwhp.

The fact is, WS6kid's car was strong before the cam and it's strong after the cam. What the **** are you gonna say after he backs it up with good track numbers? "OH THEN YOU OBVIOUSLY HAVE A STROKER, NO WAY IT'S A 346"...gimme a break.
TroubledWine3 is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:28 PM
  #65  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
WS6 Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Billiumss
It's all about marketing. Infate the numbers a tad and you sell more parts and tuning.
No, its more like: Give the real numbers and people without such great results will look for any way to discredit you.

I didnt even mention who tuned my car until someone asked because I wasnt trying to advertise, just seeing what everyone thought of my results. They are obviously extraordinary.

My car is a freak and I love that bitch Track times coming soon.

Last edited by WS6 Kid; 03-29-2006 at 01:34 PM.
WS6 Kid is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:33 PM
  #66  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
954RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TroubledWine3
The fact is, WS6kid's car was strong before the cam and it's strong after the cam.
What were his numbers before that cam again I think I missed that.
Originally Posted by TroubledWine3
What the **** are you gonna say after he backs it up with good track numbers?
Track numbers are dependant upon driver, again tons of variables, track conditions, weather etc.

I would just say the car is a freak.
954RR is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:36 PM
  #67  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
WS6 Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 954RR
What were his numbers before that cam again I think I missed that.


Track numbers are dependant upon driver, again tons of variables, track conditions, weather etc.

I would just say the car is a freak.
The car made 336/350 with a lid/catback and made 414/385 with the same setup with a **** mailorder tune from jeff creech.
WS6 Kid is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:37 PM
  #68  
Kleeborp the Moderator™
iTrader: (11)
 
MeentSS02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 10,316
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I don't think people are calling BS on the results as much as the dyno's calibration...the track times will clear this all up in a hurry though.
MeentSS02 is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:38 PM
  #69  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Billiumss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 2,975
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Read this:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/416207-my-dyno-et215-heads-wow.html
Billiumss is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:39 PM
  #70  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
954RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So the cam was worth ~90hp & 50+ torque after all tuning? Was underdive installed with the cam?
954RR is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:40 PM
  #71  
TECH Apprentice
 
C_Williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Billiumss
It's all about marketing. Infate the numbers a tad and you sell more parts and tuning.

We post on here to share info. So basically if I put my stock heads back on, buy all the same parts that WS6 Kid has and have you SD tune my car, I will make the same power within 5hp and 5tq? I really don't think so. If you didn't live so far from me, I'd have you SD tune my car so I could gain at least 20 more HP and torque.

I worked on and tune a bunch of LS1 cars and see patterns. So a MAF on a cam only car is a big air restriction or did you find some magical table in the PCM?

Yes, some cars are freaks and make more power than others but not 20 more.

If the numbers were like 410HP & 400TQ, I could believe it.

Nothing inflated on our dyno numbers...if anything it's a conservative dyno.

I'm glad you work on LS1's and have your opinions. But that's all they are.
C_Williams is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:41 PM
  #72  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,245
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WS6 Kid
The car made 336/350 with a lid/catback and made 414/385 with the same setup with a **** mailorder tune from jeff creech.
Those pre-tune numbers sound very believable for the mods you have (especially the torque). Were those numbers (pre-tune) off of Andy's dyno too? Again, I believe the 430 rwhp, I'm just trying to get a grasp on how Charlie was able to find 25 lb ft of additional torque. Don't get me wrong, he's a badass tuner...it's just that Jeff Creech isn't a hack either. 25 lb ft of PEAK torque is VERY hard to gain when you're already at 385 cam-only.

FWIW, you will be flying with your setup, regardless of what others are saying. Major props.
Patrick G is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:42 PM
  #73  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Red 01SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: StL
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Who cares about dyno numbers anyway? What does it run at the track?
Red 01SS is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 01:54 PM
  #74  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
HumpinSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I see no correction or correction factor on that graph? WS6-Kid do you have the dyno file?
HumpinSS is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 02:02 PM
  #75  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HumpinSS
I see no correction or correction factor on that graph? WS6-Kid do you have the dyno file?
Larry...

Top right corner of the dyno sheet.

SAE with smoothing 5.....typical stuff.

I am too baffled a little by the results but can vouch that the numbers from A&A's dyno are very legit....and if they skew any direction would be on the conservative side as Charlie mentioned.

Good stuff....

Looking foward to some track times (especially MPH) to potentially be the final nail in the coffin to end all the questions and disbelief (or get them cooking again if the reesults come in "light"....LOL)

Tony M.
Tony Mamo @ AFR is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 02:03 PM
  #76  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
WS6 Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HumpinSS
I see no correction or correction factor on that graph? WS6-Kid do you have the dyno file?
In the top right corner it says CF: SAE I dont have the run file, i just got the graph.
WS6 Kid is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 02:04 PM
  #77  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
HumpinSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
Larry...

Top right corner of the dyno sheet.

SAE with smoothing 5.....typical stuff.

I am too baffled a little by the results but can vouch that the numbers from A&A's dyno are very legit....and if they skew any direction would be on the conservative side as Charlie mentioned.

Good stuff....

Looking foward to some track times (especially MPH) to potentially be the final nail in the coffin to end all the questions and disbelief (or get them cooking again if the reesults come in "light"....LOL)

Tony M.

Thanks Tony I overlooked it. LOL going back to my corner now...
HumpinSS is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 02:28 PM
  #78  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
ThirdGenLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

theres always been a few freak cars, could be many possiable reasons why, but why dont we just congratulate him for nice numbers instead of trying to call bullshit. There is no reason why anyone would lie about the numbers, and if it was you who got the numbers would you want to be beaten to death that your numbers are bull ****.
ThirdGenLS1 is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 02:40 PM
  #79  
On The Tree
 
MELISSA05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Florida
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Billiumss
You are so full of ****
Well in regards to your "You are so full of ****..." I have been to many dyno tunes as my father is one of the engine builders for #2 Rusty Wallace now Kurt Busch NASCAR team. When you can have the pleasure of going to wind tunnels and dyno tunes with "THE BIG BOYS" then maybe you would be justified in calling "BULLSHIT"!!! Why can't you just swallow these numbers like a real man? ...maybe your just pissed that you don't have the knowledge or money to get your car to make that power! WS6 Kid is proud of what his car rmade and you should let him bask in his glory...

Opinions are like ********: Everybody has one

Last edited by MELISSA05; 03-29-2006 at 02:58 PM.
MELISSA05 is offline  
Old 03-29-2006, 03:59 PM
  #80  
TECH Fanatic
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by MELISSA05
Well in regards to your "You are so full of ****..." I have been to many dyno tunes as my father is one of the engine builders for #2 Rusty Wallace now Kurt Busch NASCAR team. When you can have the pleasure of going to wind tunnels and dyno tunes with "THE BIG BOYS" then maybe you would be justified in calling "BULLSHIT"!!! Why can't you just swallow these numbers like a real man? ...maybe your just pissed that you don't have the knowledge or money to get your car to make that power! WS6 Kid is proud of what his car rmade and you should let him bask in his glory...

Opinions are like ********: Everybody has one

What a .... Oh Oh Oh my daddy is meaner then your daddy...
SideStep is offline  


Quick Reply: Torquer 2, cam only, speed density #'s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM.